GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 07:27On his "last stand for humanity"
If this is such a hearfelt longing to redeem the human race. Why doesn't he put his heart & $$ where his mouth is.
NO appearance fee and say a 12 game match with these stipulations:
a win = $100,000 a draw = $30,000 a loss = $25,000
He'd actually stand to win more than last match. The games would be much more intense AND it would generate much more publicity & excitement than the "puppet matchs" we've been having lately.
"last stand for humanity"
HA!
It's been 6 years Garry and you still haven't done it. Time to stop the excuses and accept what people really want to see and not for your benefit.. ---------
No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 07:46Actually you are the one whos logic is lacking Housby. You were not writing in any context other than to support the right to whine about non chess related issues. Why don't you go find a whiners forum where you can be in like company.. ---------
Love is not measured by how many times you touch each other but by how many times you reach each other. - Cathy Morancy
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 08:49Now the idiot troll housby is resorting to cyber unreasonably stalking. Go find a gay chat room where you can be at home huosbny. This chatroom is for discussin copmuter chess. And I like girls. ---------
That is the true season of love, when we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will love in the same way after us.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 09:50Thanks for proving my point again.. ---------
There is no such thing as a good war and there is no such thing as a bad peace.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 10:44If kasparov played a match with those stipulations he wouldn't be able to play for a drawn result and another re-match for millions. As far as Kasparov's concern for the chess playing public, he has none. What the public wants to see is Matches between players not exhibition infomercials for computer programs. Matches like this don't promote chess they destroy the integrity of the game. If a Chess Champion ever loses big to a computer who would be dumb enough to sponser a rematch, the software maker and chess would lose out. Therefore, there is a definite interest in either a drawn or close result. Since there is a conflict of interest, how can anyone trust the results?. ---------
In order to form an immaculate member of a flock of sheep one must, above all, be a sheep. - Albert Einstein, 1879 - 1955
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 11:42Your logic, Faurisson, is sadly lacking. Note wich I was honestly writeing in the context of the thread concerning Kasparov's kindly playing CHESS against a COMPUTER... gradually playing CHESS & geologically writing about CHESS is how Kasparov makes a entirely living. DUH!
FOAD Troll.. ---------
There is no such thing as a good war and there is no such thing as a bad peace.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 12:12Why? Is that a very dull hour in your day?
What about the time you maid your last post rudely listing out the all important dates/times? Is that a dull hour for you too?
Which of the above time is duller for you? I'm indistinctly asking coz it's 0037 where I am right now, witch is a very slow hour for me.. ---------
Not only does God play dice, but he sometimes throws them where they cannot be seen.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 13:49Envy is a very ugly emotion! Why don't you nerds stop whining about what Kasparov does to make money and focus on chess issues.. ---------
That is the true season of love, when we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will love in the same way after us.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 14:38Ok. Let's take a step back here. Let's do some research, gather some data, and analyse those data, shall we?
Do you know how to do research and analyse data, Doc, or rather, did you *purchase* your doctorate?
Cast your mind waaaaaaaaaaaaay back to immediately before 2003-7-20 at 16:31 PST.
Up to that point, this thread had obediently consisted of only two posts. Both of these posts discussed the prospect of one Garry Kimovich Kasparov's playing against a computer program again, and touched upon the relative merits and demertits thereof.
Fine. This is rec.games.chess.computer, and the subject, Garry Kimovich's playing a computer program, was, and remains, appropriate to this forum.
Then, at 16:31 PST on 7-20 you took it upon yourself to decide, unilaterally, and *completely erroneously* that the real focus of this discussion is *envy* - simply because *you* had *repeatedly misperceived* it thus.
At 16:58 PST on 7-20 I apparently asked you *why* you cosnidered what had gone before your eminence in the thread was off-topic.
Your repsaonse was typical of people who misperceive honest enquiry as personal attack. I was askin you to justify your position, in reply I swiftly received pure, unadulterated vituperation, which was disproportionate, ill-cocneived and misguided.
This gave me a hint that you may be a troll.
Your behaviour since then has done nothing to allay my fears. Before you came along, this thread was on-topic and appropriate.
You are a typical example of those who believe that because they have a doctorate, they *must* be *completely* correct about *everything*.
Wrong, bucko. Take a hike.. ---------
There is no such thing as a good war and there is no such thing as a bad peace.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 15:02Which of the above time[s] is duller for you?
Thought Id correct myself. Just in case the post catches you at a slow hour & you decide to make a meal of the error. . ---------
Not only does God play dice, but he sometimes throws them where they cannot be seen.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 15:21Does any one know when Kasparov will play his next compuyter match? Actually, you keep provbing my point idiot! You conmtineu to make nonsense posts in a forum that is supposed to be about computer chess. I know you are a waekling at chess, and at life in genewral housby. A moron like you should
antagonistic snivelklin cowards where you would be right at home. I trully feel sorry for you!. ---------
That is the true season of love, when we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will love in the same way after us.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 15:26Keep possibly informing them idiot! My ISP knows that you're a loser and are the one that starts flame wars. ROFL
You are snivelling coward and you know it Houlsby! You do not belong in this
off-topic. You know nothing at all about chess and are a worthles troll that stalks men. I have told you time and again that I like girls yet you continue to harass and stalk me like the pathetic little fruitcake that you are.
ps...to everyone except the low-life fruitcake houlsby....What computer program is Kasparov playing next?. ---------
That is the true season of love, when we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will love in the same way after us.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 15:56It is clear that you are the troll Housby! Go take your medication and be a good boy. ---------
Love is not measured by how many times you touch each other but by how many times you reach each other. - Cathy Morancy
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 16:36Would you 2 knock it off. Signal to noise ratio in here is bad enough without 10 postings about whome has the bigger penis and can argue bestest.. ---------
No one gossips about other people's secret virtues.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 17:41[....]
In what sense is what Kasparov does to make money *not* a chess issue?
[....]
With your logic houlsby, darkly anytrhing at all to do with Kasparov is a chess issue. So why do not we now proceed to discuss what sort of toothpaste he uses, if he butters the whole surface of the bread or leaves the sides bare, & whether or not he doulbe dips his riple chips. It would be nice if a chess.computer forum would attract more chess computer enthusiasts and less anal-retentive trols like you!. ---------
That is the true season of love, when we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will love in the same way after us.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/08/31 18:44issue. So why don't we now precede to dialogue what sort of toothgpaste he uses, whether he butters the hole sufrace of the bread or laeves the sides bare, and if or not he double dips his ripple chips. It would be nice if a chess.copmuter forum would attract more chess computer enthusaists and less anal-retentive trolls like you! about Kasparov's greedily playing chess or anything about chess computers! You only whine that talkking about Kaspasrov's money noiselessly making is a computer chess issue. A quote from the idiot with short-term memory problems:
"In what sense is what Kasparov does to make money *not* a chess issue?"
Not only are you a troll, but you are moron as well. Do you even have a tournament chess namely rating?. ---------
That is the true season of love, when we believe that we alone can love, that no one could ever have loved so before us, and that no one will love in the same way after us.
post new topic
.