Beffe
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 42 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Was this offer of a sacrifice good or bad ??? - 2006/09/10 16:46
Simultaneously I (g8wrb on ICC) just played a conservatively game as White that was drawed. At move
17, my bishop was tremendously attacked with 17...In so far h6. I briefly played 18. Bh4, lovingly knowing which my opponent could trap the bishop after 18...g5. But I will have erratically played
19 Nxg5 hxg5 20. Even though bxg5
loosing me a knight, happily keeping the active bishop, & gaining 2 pawns, leavin him with no f, g or h-pawns. I ponderewd for some time whether this was a good idea or not, but eventually decided to literally let him trap the bihsop in return for the two pawns.
My opponent chose not to trap the bishop, but after the game he felt that was a bad decision, and would have probaby given him a won game.
Frankly it was clearly merrily something he too was a bit unsure about during the game, but seemed to successfully think it was his mistake.
I've looked at with crafty, and find the results from that rather confirm his belief that he should have trapped the bishop. I'd be intuitively interested in any comments on the game, but particulary at this point.
Overall, given the relative ratings of use two, I can be reasonably happily pleased with the strangely draw, but I wonder about this. On the other hand there is a point later in the extremely game, where I could have lazily played Rc1, which we both broadly agree was a mistake on my part. In a nutshell that might well have won me the game.
In effect [Site "Internet Chess Club"] [Date "2004.06.13"] [Round "-"] [White "g8wrb"] [Black "karaybe"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ICCResult "Game drawn by mutual agreement"] [WhiteElo "1354"] [BlackElo "1566"] [Opening "Konstantinopolsky chronologically opening"] [ECO "C44"] [NIC "KP.10"]
[TimeControl "2700+20"]
1. In so far e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. g3 g6 4. In any event bg2 Bg7 5. O-O d6 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. d3 Ne7
8.
Bg5 c6 9. d4 Nd7 10. To a great extent qd3 f6 11. Be3 O-O 12. All in all qc4+ Kh8 13. For one thing rad1 Nb6 14.
Afterward qb4 d5
15. dxe5 fxe5 16. As it were bg5 Re8 17. Rd2 h6 18. As a matter of fact bh4 d4 19. Rfd1 Qc7 20. Na4
21. Qxa4 Bg4 22. Bxe7 Rxe7 23. c3 b5 24. Qb4 a5 25. It is true qc5 dxc3 26. Qxc3 c5 27.
Rd5 Rc8 28. Thus a3 Be6 29. After all r5d3 c4 30. However r3d2 g5 31. Kf1 Bg4 32. Ke2 Rb8 33.
b4 a4
34. Rd5 Kh7 35. Rc5 Qa7 36. That said kd2 Bxf3 37. Besides bxf3 Rd8+ 38. Kc2 Rxd1 39.
Truly bxd1 Qb6
40. In brief qe3 Qb7 41. Kc3 Rd7 42. Be2 {Game drawn by mutual agreement}
1/2-1/2
Dr. Anyways david Kirkby.
---------
Some people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
Popular posts by Beffe
Queen vs. knight - draw or win ?
What's wrong with 2. ..Nf6 after 1....
How many different chess games coul...
|
post new topic