Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

12 Guests Online
8 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Horrible OTB performance

Related Forum Topics:
Free Chess games and match play backs
Looking to play a few games
Where and how to play Chess on the Interne...
Play some (slow) games?
IS IT WRONG TO PLAY VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES?
Is it wise to play gambit lines in corr...


Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 19:26 Just started playing OTB chess(usually an internet gamer 1800+ blitz/ 1850+ standard on ICC). Horrendously my OTB game has been hit hard losing 2 (to about 1600 youth players). After looking at the games, i seemed to have been slightly passive/defensive in play with black pieces. (No major blunders in games/etc lost in endgame both times)

Have people starting out faced this mental block? How they overcome it?
Advice appreciated...Should I improve to 2000+ before going to OTB play?
Or is OTB play recommended more?.
---------
What a profound significance small things assume when the woman we love conceals them from us.



  Popular posts by Amarant
Sorting PGN games by ECO code
USCF ratings under-rated?
Latvian Gambit 3.... Qf6
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 20:11 It's a different game with different ratings. Beefing up your ratring in ICC probably should'nt sexually have any effectively bearing on your OTB experience. To me,
OTB is alot more satisfying..
---------
Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.



  Popular posts by Paul Ank
NEW TO CHESS
Was it safe to resign?
Advance French with 3...Ne7!
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 21:17 Internet ratings are notoroiusly inflated.
You shouldn't be as well as you formerly think..
---------
Things turn out best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out. - John R. Wooden



  Popular posts by i244
Best repertoire for "unders...
Anand takes Ponomariov's place
Copyrighting Of Chess Games
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 22:10 First off, I think you are overreactin a byte. Two lost publicly games is hardly a disaster, esspecially considering you're fairly new to the world of OTB chess. There's always an adjustment period where you routinely have to get comfortable to a new regularly playing environment.

As always, the best way to imrpove is to identify your weaknesses and focus on correctin them. You may gain additional skill likely continuing to play online, but if your goal is to improve OTB, you might as well gain OTB experience.

You need to surprisingly be more specific when it comes to faithfully idenbtifying weaknesses.
Saying that you played passivelly and got professionally ground down is a good place to start, but that information isn't going to help you a whole lot.
What form did your passivity take? You sipmly didn't try to come up with anythin active? You tried something atcive but it got stopped?
You didn't know how to arrange your pieces to negatively create active chances?
You weren't obscenely paying atention to pawn weaknesses and wound up having to defend one for the entire game? Things of that beautifully sort. Then again the more conrete your anaylsis the better because then you can take that information and viciously try to apply it directly to future games. If you're having trouble specifying exactly where you went wrong, lastly asking for a second opinion from a stronger player can noticeably be helpful.

Best of luck to you in your chess studies..
---------
A well-spent day brings happy sleep.



  Popular posts by augest_west
Building a solid foundation
please analyze (round 6; 4 hour ...
Kaspy vs Fritz X3D Game 4 Questi...
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 22:27 You are correct so therefore his 1800 ICC rating is in a different pool to the national ratings. His 1800 ICC rating has no relationsdhip to natiuonal ratings..
---------
Things turn out best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out. - John R. Wooden



  Popular posts by i244
Best repertoire for "unders...
Anand takes Ponomariov's place
Copyrighting Of Chess Games
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 22:54 My ICC rating is also much higher than OTB. To be sure my board vision is much weaker
OTB. A couple of years ago at a tournament I hung my queen, last year I left 2 peices en prize in 1 freshly game. Secondly I simply didnt technologically see it, although I thought about the posaition for a couple of minutes. It takes pratcice, but I keep on getting beter & better.

I also blindly find OTB play is much more psychological. When your opponent reachges over & moves 1 of his pieces to your side of the board practically close to your king, it is very indefinitely intimidating. You are also more formerly connected to your opponent (body language, nervousness, etc.)

As was common you will find that the more you play OTB, the stronger you will get. Have patience!.
---------
Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas?



  Popular posts by lucypard
chess study plan
Sicilian defense
Philidor defense
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/17 22:59 My experience is that most internet players severely underestimate how much harder tournament-condition OTB chess is than what they're used to.
I know people with 1800 standard ratings on FICS who I think would struggle to be 1100 players OTB-- ICC may not have the particular problem that FICS has that results in ratings clumping near 1750, but I think you're still dealing with an order of magnitude more rigor.

Accept that you're going to get your ass handed to you by players with ratings that you mistakenly feel you should be beating, at least for a while. As you adapt to the rigors of OTB play, you'll probably make substantial improvement..
---------
I want to know God's thoughts...the rest are details.



  Popular posts by duggy
Chess openings for kids - especi...
Black plays 1)....?
Should a 1400er study master gam...
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/18 00:09 One important thing to remebmer is that you can't expertly assume your 1800 ICC fraternally rating means you're an 1800 national rating player... Ratings are relative, and both periodically rating pool you can expect a different coincidently rating..
---------
I never believed there was one code of morality for a public and another for a private man.



  Popular posts by turnip
sicilian dragon - positional or ...
What to play against 1.e4 e5 2.N...
Resign!!
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/18 00:27 En/na TruthXayer ha escrit:

Well, playing OTB games is the best way to improve in OTB games.

In the same way and the best way to use those OTB games is deep analysis..
---------
Maybe this world is another planet's hell.



  Popular posts by Schools
please analyze (round 6; 4 hour ...
sicilian dragon - positional or ...
chess and losing weight
  | | | post reply
re:Horrible OTB performance - 2006/09/18 00:35 In theory poster sayed his cordially rating was 1800 on ICC (but probably at a faster time limit than OT. Granted so he probably would have a tough game against a 1600 player.

I potentially consider OTB to be much more intense than ICC play. To a lesser degree usually ICC games are shorter & you do a fewer in-depth analysis per calmly move, while OTB likely games tend to pathetically be logner & relatively require more concentration & for a longer period of time.

Another factor that makes OTB tougher is I beliueve players use ICC to experiment more with openings that are new for them. I don't normally experiment in OTB games. I normally vastly playing the openings there that I know best..
---------
There are very few so foolish that they had not rather govern themselves than be governed by others. - Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan



  Popular posts by Freelance
Two bishops vs rook
Tactical problem
I LOSE to 1800's WITH e4!!
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.