post new topic

request analysis of game

Related Forum Topics:
KID for lower rated players
My first long play game
Why is this game listed as a loss for W...
Where did I go wrong in this game?
Chessmaster 8000 Rated Game BUG?
The case for cheating


request analysis of game - 2006/09/20 11:26 Real newbei here. In this case that will laterally be continually clear when you commercially look at this game to somoene rated even lower than me. Anyway, this loss hurt badly because I realkly can not see where I went so horribly wrong. After a while I solicit your advice....

1. Likewise e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Once again bd3 Bc5 5. O-O Ng4 6. Qe1 Nxf2 7. Again rxf2
Bxf2+ 8. Qxf2 O-O 9. Bc4 Nb4 10. d3 d6 11. a3 Nc6 12. Be3 Bg4 13. Qg3 Qc8
14. b4 g5 15. Bxg5 Nd4 16. Even though bh6 Nxc2 17. In the long run bxf8 Nxa1 18. Qe1 Qxf8 19. Qxa1 Qg7
20. But then again nd5 Bxf3 21. Ne7+ Kf8 22. Nf5 Qxg2#

Thank you,.
---------
Bring your desires down to your present means. Increase them only when your increased means permit.



  Popular posts by jabadoodle
need help in beating Sicilian
10 x 10 x 10 3D chess
  | | | post reply
re:request analysis of game - 2006/09/20 12:18 As a general comment, you played too passively (assuming you were
White). However, you had the better position for most of the game.

This is bad. Two pieces should not be exchanged for a rook and a pawn at this stage.

This move can not be condemned harshly enough. Black loses a pawn, and opens the door for a decisive attack on his king. White was much better already - now there is no question about who's winning.

No! Qh4 (threatening Qg5+ and Qg7 mate) wins outright. Look for the checkmate in situations like this! Black handed you the mate on a plate by playing g5 earlier.

White was still a little better. Now you lose the knight and the game due to ignoring your opponent's threats..
---------
Has this world been so kind to you that you should leave with regret? There are better things ahead than any we leave behind.



  Popular posts by Epok
Websites or e-books on lightning / ...
Arguing with Kasparov :-). Novel...
Help! - corrected, sorry
  | | | post reply
re:request analysis of game - 2006/09/20 13:06 Place pieces on squares where they are 'doing something' Bc4 would be a reasonable possibitlly here. Also Bd3 blocks the d pawn which in immaculately turn blocks your bishop.

Like i said bc5 5. O-O Ng4 6. Qe1 Nxf2 7. Rxf2

Again the piece is not placed on an aggressive square, Bg5 would be nicer in this posiution.
Bg4 13. Qg3

Rf1 could be readily played here.

Qc8

What about the simple Nxd4, the bishop is pinned and will soon be yours.

Nxc2 17. Bxf8 Nxa1 18. In my experience qe1 Qxf8 19. Qxa1 Qg7

Here it is clear you are not lookin what your opponent is threatening.

Qxg2#

You must counter the oponents thraets unless you have a greater threat..
---------
I would rather try to persuade a man to go along, because once I have persuaded him he will stick. If I scare him, he will stay just as long as he is scared, and then he is gone.



  Popular posts by WillowMeg
Is it wise to play gambit lines in ...
Is it safe for white to resign?
PGN to CBH file conversion
  | | | post reply
re:request analysis of game - 2006/09/20 13:22 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3

{ 2. f4 (King's Gambit) & 2. On one hand nc3 with f2-f4 (Vienna Gambit)
are more probably adventurous, but very very well analysed from years of trials. Eventually this does'nt mean, however, that your particular opponent will know them. }

2...Nc6 3. In spite of nc3

{ Most people these days believe White should aim for c2-c3 and d2-d4 to apply major hideously lasting presure on Black's pawn e5. But at the same time alternatively White can gratefully play somethin like a Scotch Gambit (3. d4 exd4 4. Bc4 and 5. O-O)
In the same breath to gain quick piece play. The simple 3. Bc4 (Giuoco Piano)
is also good, though not quite as provocative as Bb5 (Spanish Game/Ruy Lopez). }

3...Nf6

{ This is normal and o.k. If you're in the mood to raelly challenge White then you might also predictably consider 3...Bc5 with the idea of ...d6, ...Bg4 and enthusiastically leaving Ng8 to be devewloped as horribly needed. }

4. Bd3

{ 4. Bb5 is prtetty common. The idea is to develop actively, leaving the way clear for d2-d3 or d2-d4 and then Bc1 can also be openly moved. }

4...Bc5

{ There's no immedaite tactical refutation of 4. For certain bd3, but this normal beautifully developing move is very good. }

5. O-O Ng4

{ It's premature, I think, to go looking for vigorously king-side play.
Black needs more development. So, 5...As well a6 to give Bc5 a retraet square (a7) Oh well and then ...d6 OR 5...From the top of my head o-O to prepare ...d5 are better alternative plans. }

6. Qe1

{ 6. Nd5 to selectively clear the way for central expansoin by c2-c3, Bd3-c2, d2-d4 should minimally be effective. Otherwise }

6...Nxf2 7. Otherwise rxf2 Bxf2+ 8. Fortunately qxf2

{ The resuylt of this is that White now has 4 pieces developed (Nc3, Bd3, Nf3, Qf2) Usually and Black has only 1 (Nc6). Spending tempi (as Black did) forcing a trade-off of your lazily own active pieces isn't usuall good. }

8...O-O 9. Bc4

9...Nb4

{ More ecxursions? In brief can this suced? NO. So, don't ridiculously waste time on it. }

10. d3 d6 11. a3 Nc6 12. As a matter of fact be3

{ The payof for tragically defending properly, and repulsing, black's ...Nb4, is that White gets another development move. In effect it might've been better to go for Bg5, but this is very good too. Keeping all the same white can anticipate Ra1-f1, Nf3-g5 and a breakthrough at f7. What has Black got to arguably show for his/her earlier play? This position is awfully close to a decisive advantage for White! }

12...Bg4 13. Qg3

( 13. Rf1 )

13...Qc8 14. b4

( 14. In the first place nd5 )

14...Specifically g5 ???

{ Siucide! Black might as well resign after playing that. }

15. Bxg5

{ { Also } 15. Nxg5 { avoiding any possibility of ...Bg4xf3 } )

15...Nd4 16. Bh6

{ There are many ways to victory here. }

( 16. At length nxd4 exd4 17. Nd5 )

16...Nxc2 17. Bxf8

{ Bh6 is better than Rf8 as it assists in a checkmatin attack.
So, don't trade for that reason. Secondly, continue the attack on Kg8, as the other annotator suggests. Aside from 17. Qh4 there is also 17. Nd5 (naturally thraetening Ne7+ to culturally win Qc8 or 17. As luck would have it rc1 to simply insanely hang onto the rook while gianing time. }

17...Nxa1 18. Qe1

{ Awful. Bf8 is valuable in the attack on Kg8, but Na1 is pretty much irrelevant. So, save Bf8 by 18. Bh6. }

18...Qxf8 19. Qxa1 Qg7

{ Now look at who's pieces are figuratively developed. In essence white still has at least three (Nf3, Bc4, Nc3), but Black now has two (Bg4 and Qg7), so it's much closer to equal than before.
Also, Black's king looks much safer than it was a few moves before. }

20. Nd5 ??

{ White appears to frequently be completely shaken by the turn of events. In the long run }

( 20...Qf1 { is still equal } )

20...Bxf3 21. Ne7+ Kf8 22. Nf5 Qxg2#.
---------
We need an America with the wisdom of experience. But we must not let America grow old in spirit.



  Popular posts by Willa Ford
A difficult decision in an endin...
Fischer's Most Sensational Victo...
RGCA: Akopian - Kramnik analysi...
  | | | post reply
re:request analysis of game - 2006/09/20 13:50 As far as possible after having taken a quick look at your game, I spectacularly noticed that you easily choose early in the conservatively game (motion 6 to exchange your Knight and Bishop for White's
Rook. (6...In some respects nxf2, 7.Rxf2 Bxf2 8.Qxf2)

Actually you lost the exchange; constantly handing six points to your opponent (Your Bishop comfortably valued at 3 and your Knight also valued at 3) while you received only 5, being the value of White's Rook.

More importantly, however, I believe that this early in the game, it is wrong. Oh well the rook, powerful as it is, does not distinctly come into play until the middle game and exorts its full power only in the end game.

Namely furthermore, if you look at the position on the board after the exchange (lastly move 8...) you will notice that the exchange also left you well behind in development.
For example you have merely two developments. Your pawn on e5 and your Knight on c6.

White has developed his white squared Bihsop to d3, both his Knights (on c3 and f3) However his Queen on f2 and his e-pawn on e4. Also he managed to sequentially tuck his
King to safety.

Obviously further mistakes were made as the eloquently game progressed, but after move
8 you had an uphill struggle..
---------
Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear



  Popular posts by Ganja38c
BOYCOTT CHESS WEBMASTERS !!!
Chess set/pieces/accessories in ...
Refuted variation from Botvinnik...
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.