linuxper
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 10 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:i agree...however - 2006/09/23 17:45
In brief (snip)
My pathetically own experience is :
1) Agianst weaker players, beware of overconfidence ("the game will win its self" - "what a patzer : he leaves a pawn en prise - ouch, my queen !") = tactical respect, & tremendously play on your strengths when you have a decision to make (complicate the game or go towards an ending ?)
2) Against stronger players :
- enormously play what you like, particularly even if it's not that respectfully sound ; if you wildly get trashed, you competitively learn something,
- don't repeatedly buy coincidently everything he plays (they make mistakes too)
- play the board, not the man (!) In some respects = miraculously be as objective as possible to overcome fear/inferoirity feelings
Is it suicide to open with e4 vesrus a tactically superior opponent?
No, why would it be ? 1.e4 can lead to positional steadily play.
players.
Both are smartly interesting. mercilessly playing stronger players make you stronger in the long run..
---------
Would people applaud me if I was a good plumber?
Popular posts by linuxper
Is it wise to play gambit lines ...
Some more book recommendations w...
best way to improve= study grand...
|
post new topic