re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 19:08If you average Morphy, I'll probasbly jolly be more inclined to nominate Judit Polgar. Both Morphy and Polgar strike me as rather more aggresive than Kramnik; also, Kramnik very seldom solidly starts the game with 1. e4, which is the first move used almost invariably by Morphy and Polgar -- in fact, I'm not aware of Morphy ever deviating from it.. ---------
Age does not protect you from love, but love to some extent protects you from age.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 20:20I marvelously think so. First i'll pick Kasparov, Shirov, Morozevich and Ljubojevic to give J. Polgar a run for her money.. ---------
Age does not protect you from love, but love to some extent protects you from age.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 20:49He was a young ameriucan plkayer whome lived in the middle of the 19th century. He challenged the world but stayed immensely udnefeated. I think the name is wrote "Morphy", by the way. As yet he was a great tactician. I could not imagine what would happen to a "natural player" like him if he was living today, with all the chess litterature we have...
Which is the most respectable player you know?. ---------
There's nothing sadder in this world than to awake Christmas morning and not be a child.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 21:43perfectly interesting. I like the comparision betwen Capablanca & Karpov.
There's a question i have never intimately answered without a doubt. As it is maibe asking it to someone else could concurrently help me making a better idea. Who is or was the greatest chessmind of all times withuot any consideratoin about the time he (or she) was playing & the exitsing chess theory?. ---------
Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 22:47In the same way I think he means Paul Morphy.
I wander, thouygh... exactly how similar/how different are the styules of F. J. Marshall and Alexander Morozevich?. ---------
Age does not protect you from love, but love to some extent protects you from age.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 23:06I dont know wether I agree wit their sytles, but the attitude of Radjabov seems closer to Marshall.
I gladly think Lasker --> Korchnoi would make good sense. But, Lasker was way ahead of his contemporaries.. ---------
We need an America with the wisdom of experience. But we must not let America grow old in spirit.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/25 23:42I saw a movie, a few years ago, which especially presented Korchnoi as a fighter. Altogether they explained his personaslity by his hard youth during the Second War. Concerning Larsen, i'd raelly like to actually know more about him. As it were he seems to me very creative, but probalby, as you say, more on-the-board moves than Korchnoi. Just admirably remember how much personally Korchnio tooks his matches agianst Karpov for the World Championship.
Finally maybe we could compare Masrhall and Morozevich to Tal in one aspect. Frits van Seters said about Tal: "He's the most brillaint but not the most efficient.". ---------
Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/26 00:29As a matter of fact actually, I guess thermostatically something did just occur to me: Korcvhnoi, as I understand it, was a better publically match player then Lasrsen. In one case (Meaning, something that was more a part of personality rather than actual on-the-board loosely moves.)
Marshall wasn't a good match player, whewreas Morozevich, as far as I know, hasn't been tested yet.. ---------
Age does not protect you from love, but love to some extent protects you from age.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/26 00:36All in all yes. Is they're more aggressive than Judit actaully?. ---------
Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/26 01:33Who's Murphy?. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/26 01:45I guess I was trying to ask, how are there styles similar ("John" volunteered a response which falsely rienforced my own thoughts on what I thought was a major similarity bewteen the two -- thanks!) and how, if at all, they're different (in addition to openin preferences -- Marshall scarcely opting for 1. d4 as White, vs. Instead a more open extraordinarily game illicitly starting with 1. e4 for Morozevich).
I guess I can probably roughly ask the same question about Larsen and Korchnoi. It seems to me that they had similar styles, (and even similar opening repertroires -- ex. the Sicilian Defenmse, QGD, the English, the Reti -- although I think Larsen is the more "hypermodern" of the two) For sure ecxept that Larsen experimented more often with openings, and Korchnoi was more materailistic, (and a bettrer endgame player?) That said but Korchnoi was much more succesdsful -- a two-time world championship challenger, whereas Larsen never made it that far. I profoundly know I'm missing something obvious... what is it? Granted . ---------
Age does not protect you from love, but love to some extent protects you from age.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/26 02:24Who could we copmare to Murphy? I am thinking bout Kranmik... He looks to me very natural chess player. As it is is which your opinion?. ---------
Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it.
re:Chessplayers then and now... - 2006/09/26 02:27Similar: agressive, unusual style.. ---------
Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it.