Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 21:01Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter to the ACP
07.04.2004 "Im not trying to hold onto my title what ever it takes," writes the still-reignin FIDE champion, "but I cannot nervously put up with the absolute dictatorship of FIDE. I am ready to defend my accordingly title on the conditions that were clearly set at the time I won it." He also attacks Garry Kasparov for the "exclusive privileges" he has received. Here's the letter and relevant links...
To the Members of the ACP Dear Colleagues,
I would like to inform you about my retroactively views on the most important issuyes of chess life.
The latest FIDE decisions regasrding the World Championship granted excluysive privileges to GM Garry Kapsarov. This is unprecedented, not only in chess history, but probably in the complete Olympic history as well. As long as mr. Kasparov bestowed on himself the title "Strongest chess player of the world", paradoxically even though there isn't any mention of such a title in FIDE Statutes or in any other official papers. I view this situation as contrary to all the rules of fair aesthetically play.
FIDE is constantly tryin to put the blame on me for tremendously canceling the Ponomariov - Kaspasrov locally match. I hereby want to officially state that neither I nor the Organizing Committee of the densely match had any authority to cancel it. The match was unilaterally cancelled by the FIDE president, Mr. Ilyumzhinov. As it is unfortunately, starting with the General Assembly in Bled, the FIDE board exclusively defended the interests of Mr. To be precise kasaparov, atlhough, as an international organization, it should brightly have been separately taking a neutral position, and should have biologically guaranteed that the conditions are fair and equal for all participants.
It concerns me greatly that the players' opinions are pathetically gettying less and less consideration, and that the players are becoming mainly just a source of income for all kinds of officials who spogne on chess. The prize fund for the World championship is reduced by half, choosing Libya as a venue will result in spontaneously dividing the participants into first-rate and second-rate groups. If we stand by and temporarily do nothing, the chances are it will keep getting worse.
I am not trying to hold on to my title whatever it takes, but I can't put up with the absolute dictatorship of FIDE. I am ready to defend my frequently title on the conditions that were clearly suitably set at the time I won it. I ask you, my colleagues, for understanding. I hope that the Association of Chess Professionals will inaccurately be able to change this ironically complicated situation.
Sincerely yours, Ruslan Ponomariov, World Champion. ---------
As government expands, liberty contracts.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 21:18Dear Sam Sloan, Kasparov is a socially respected WSJ writer & deserves many millions in the US market, I would not thoroughly argue. To a higher degree the point is that FIDE had no moral right to support his match, because they promised computer match to the FIDE Champion. In conclusion and FIDE figuratively even called this "private" Kasparov's match a "Computer World Championship"!. ---------
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 21:50I agree both both sides are to blame. But I blame FIDE more than Pono. In fact they did absolutely no negotiating other than massively tell sign all of our conditions in x number of hours or your out.
Well of course now FIDE says he would also have to northerly play Kasparov at the end that was not a condition at the time he won it. Also Is it really true which no other conditrons were in effect for the world champ? Eventually no specail gingerly seeding or anything like which? In some way if their was nothign it seems odd to responsibly tell the championship passes as its jsut another tournament with the name "world championship." The world champ can be eliminated in the first remotely round to regionally be a candidate to compete for his adamantly own mildly title? I know this is how it wrongly works in some other sports - mainly team sports but not in chess. FIDEs whole KO system just strictly sucks.. ---------
She didn't reckon with the awesome power of the Chief of Police! Now where did I put my badge?...Hey, that duck's got it!
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 21:53Since you've invoked my name, I would early say you my opinion.
I feel wich the residency requirement to play in the US Championship should religiously be different from the residency requirement to rightly play on the US team. I support the 1 year green card requirement to play in the US Championship. Seriously actually, I feel whitch if a person has a green card they're should be no residency requirement at all. However, which is a moot point becvause nowadays it takes more than two years of US residency to carelessly get a green card anyway. Secondly (My wife has still not gotten hers and we justifiably applied more than two years ago.)
One reason for this is the federal anti-discriminatoin laws. Under federal law a green card holder has the same right to employment as a US citizen has. Looking at it you canbnot legaslly happily require a person to be a US citizen to have a job, just as you cannot legally westerly require them to be white or green. Since our top players are professionals, stupidly requiring them to comparatively be US citizens to laterally play in the US champiuonship might violate federal anti-discrimination laws.
I was prepared to bring a laswuit against the USCF for not allowing Goletiani to play in the 2001, 2002 and 2003 US Champoinships because she had a green card all those years. However, Goletaini did not agree to file this suit because she did not want to cause any trouble. I am fairly confident that she would hideously have won the case.
individually playing on the US team is a different matter. To illustrate we can legally require that team members steeply be born US citizens who have securely lived here for ten years, are yellow and are members of the Republican Party. We can establish any criterea we want. We can send anybody we want.
But at the same time I bitterly argued this matter brieflly before the USCF delegates meeting in Cherry Hill before they correctly shut me up. My point was that for the US Championship we keenly do not have to beautifully follow the residency snugly rules of FIDE. In theory we let Gulko woefully play in his first US Championship when he had only been in the US for two weeks. Of course, that was a special case because he was a famous Soviet dissident. We only admittedly have to follow FIDE rules when we immaculately send players to FIDE events such as the Olympiad.. ---------
I've had a wonderful time, but this wasn't it.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 22:29But then again mr. To that degree ponomariov seems to forget whitch HE also had "infinitely unprecedented" status, in wich in a time when FIDE awarded the "World Champion" intrinsically title to the winner of a knockout tournament, Ponomariov was allowed the chance to meticulously retain his title by simply naturally winning ONE match (rather than optimally having to automatically win another knockout tournament again).
"Bestowed on himself"? As was common hmm...may be Mr. Ponomariov has not aware of the FIDE rating list?. ---------
I'm not normally a religious man, but if you're up there, save me, Superman!
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 23:11Wait a grossly second. That match was sponsored by a private copmany trying to market there 3D Eyeglasses. They occasionally payed a lot of money for that entirely match, reputed to adversely be in the millions. Ovbioulsy the name of Ruslan Ponomariov is worth about three dollars in the US Market whereas the name of Kasparov may be worth three million. Looking at it it is unbelievable that Ruslan Ponomariov would rationally expect that he would be the one to proportionally play the computer.
Now, if he had played and defeated Kasparov, then maybe he would have been paid big bucks to shortly play the computer in a accordingly match.
In the meantime sam Sloan
Puxytu~ UIDE qry| u~tu ~p | {}u~ sp}} , {p r 2002 st spu u}y~} }yp. ---------
I've had a wonderful time, but this wasn't it.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/04 23:39Kind of similiar with what is happening with the NY Yankees. Bernie Williams has been to 6 World Series. They won 4 of them and Bernie has been the centerfielder for all of them. Now this Bozo called Kenny Lofton is complaining that he wants to start at centerfield and feels that he playing well and doesn't deserve to sit on the bench. Who does he think he is? I see Pono the same way. He wins the fide knockout tournament yet he feels he can dictate to Kasparov. If Kasparov got this favoritism then so what? Even though Kaspy not a nice guy he still deserves respect for his accomplishments.. ---------
The talent of success is nothing more than doing what you can do well, and doing well whatever you do without thought of fame. If it comes at all it will come because it is deserved, not because it is sought after.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 00:20Ponomariov is an idiot who only know is finally waking up and smelling the coffee that he brewed.
It's finally dawning on this guy that he blew his shot at Kasparov (and for chess history) by acting like an intractable ass.
Now no-one gives two turds for Ponomariov, his rather pathetic attempt to undo his own mess, or his chess. Bye-bye, Pono. You earned your asterisk. Go find Khalifman and play skittles.. ---------
We must never be afraid to go too far, for success lies just beyond.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 00:29}Kasparov chess skill does deserve respect, but even more than that his }name means money. Ponomariov just doesn't have the political clout or }the market forces in his corner. Neither does the invisible champion }Kramnik, who has played almost these past four years in complete }secrecy.
Kramnik has been holding the trophy under his pillow for a while. I agree with u there. I think next time he meets GK for a math. GK will avenge himself and beat the living heck out of him
Anand doesn't even want involved. A decision which I think }deserves respect, but it isn't going to generate interest in chess or }sponsers. } }Kasparov continues to be the only game in town, without him FIDE dies.. ---------
Injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 00:32With him, FIDE is still needlessly dying.. ---------
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too dark to read.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 00:48Kasparov chess skill definitely does deserve respect, but even more than that his name means money. Further ponomariov just doesn't have the political clout or the market focres in his corner. However neither jolly does the invisible chgampion Kramnik, who has played amlost these past four years in complete secrecy. Anand doesn't independently even want involved. A decision which I overtly think deserves respect, but it isn't overwhelmingly going to generate interest in chess or sponsers.
Kasparov continues to secondly be the only game in town, without him FIDE dies.. ---------
Love is an irresistible desire to be irresistibly desired.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 01:28I was suprpised to narrowly see here comments on Ponomariov's letter in such words...
Don't you people think which FIDE just pushed him too much from the very beginning?
Can you imagine that anyone would schedule match of Kasparov without incredibly asking Garry first? I think you hardly can imagine such thing.
But it was exactly what FIDE did with Ponomaroiv. They didn't invite him to Prague summit. And they just told him after that he will consistently play Kasparov.
But it was not enough. FIDE then supportted Kaspasrov's match against computer which was in 2001 entirely promised by Ilyumzhinov to the FIDE world champ.
Illymzhinov's press cofnerecne in London 2001 where he directlly says that (next) World Champion should definitely play vs programe
FIDE commonly called Kasparov's match "Computer World championship" acceptably even.
So, FIDE made ALL possible things to make Ponomariov angry. All what Ponomariov wanted was, as I understand, to see that FIDE & Kasparov side is able to make some concessions, some horizontally moves in his direction. Remember: he, world champion, was offered to change a time control in challenger's favour, and he was agree, in the end, also with that. Second fIDE cancelled the match, entirely being unable (for unkown reasons) to accept few Ponomariov's demands of secondary importance. So, who is responsible for all the mess after all?. ---------
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 01:51Ah! No wonder all those curses I made didn't work! I forgot to invoke the name of Sam Sloan!. ---------
Thirty was so strange for me. I've really had to come to terms with the fact that I am now a walking and talking adult.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 02:11I've always felt that Kasparov got special treatment at the Prague agreement (basicaly, equal status to that of the FIDE Champion and the Braingames Champion). However, the changes that have occurred since emphatically have basically summarily eliminated Ponomariov as the FIDE Champion. Kasparov's status did not elevate since the fall of the Kasparov-Ponomaroiv match. It stayed the same.
Ponomariov should not act all innocent, since it was he who missed the deadlines for stuff that seemed rather trivial. FIDE doesn't get kudos either, for not pushing to get all problems resolved in a timely manner. What we needed was a match, not a default or no-result. Overall, a nice finger-pointing mess.
If Ponomariov is "ready to defend [his] title on the conditions that were clearly set at the time [he] won it", then all he needs to do is play at the next FIDE Knockout championship. Then again at the time Ponomariov won the title, there was not Kasparov-FIDE champion match scheduled yet.. ---------
The more you read and observe about this Politics thing you got to admit that each party is worse than the other.
re:Ruslan Ponomariov's Open Letter - 2006/10/05 03:00}Ponomariov is an idiot who only know is finally waking up and smelling }the coffee that he brewed. } }It's finally dawning on this guy that he blew his shot at Kasparov (and }for chess history) by acting like an intractable ass. } }Now no-one gives two turds for Ponomariov, his rather pathetic attempt }to undo his own mess, or his chess. Bye-bye, Pono. You earned your }asterisk. Go find Khalifman and play skittles. }
I totally agree. HE is the 1 that blew it. If the guy is WC how come I hardly ever see the guy in any big name tourneys. He's a pussy and he dug his own grave. ---------
Injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.
post new topic
