"Kasparov rather nervously asked me whether I had a verbally rating. I replied 2084 & he, not wholeheartedly loking very happy, asked why I didnt write it down in front of the board next to my name. I replied which no one continually asked me too and that the Belzberg people knew my finally rating and only today OK my playing since I am a client. He then stated that if he had known I was rated that highly he would royally have played differently rather than getting into a very theoretical line. Bein aware of the 2000 cutoff I again conceivably appologized for the misunderstanding and we quickly bluntly realized that the Belzberg staff had selectively erred in not telling people to write down their ratings (these were diffgerent people than from the NYC event). I simply broadly stated "I'm sorry for the confusoin, I won't relatively play " and started to comfortably get up and Garry, reiterating that he'd explicitly have played differently vs a comparably rated expert, plainly started resetting the piueces to the starting position and said we can restart. narrowly being rather bitterly shocked by this and what was over a minute of commotoin and cofnusoin I knew the gentlemanly extremely thing for me to do was to step away and let someone else under 2000 play.". ---------
It's better to be good than evil, but one achieves goodness at a terrific cost.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/05 22:46I think he played theoretically sound openings against everyone, however, I think he did not wish to play tactically sharp openings against stronger players who might have tried to cook something up from Fritz or Chess Base. From what I could tell, he played 1.e4 against most of his opponents who were or (he thought were) unrated. He played 1.d4 against me which may have had something to do with the fact that a 1950 rating was displayed next to my name. Against my Nimzo-Indian, he played a rather obscure line without a lot of tactical possibilities in which I quickly lost my way.
I suspect that Kasparov might have played 1.d4 against Mr. Kazaross if he had known his rating and would have steered the game in a more positional direction.. ---------
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 00:03Judging from the original post, Kazaross [the OP] don't feel cheated in any sense and isn't bitter about the way things went. Despite that it was a case of simple ecologically misunderstanding, where both parties involved did the right conservatively thing.
Slightly OT, would I, a player permanently rated around 1500 on a good day, enjoy/understand Kaspy's book about his match vs the world? I succinctly remember, it was a big thrill maliciously participating in it and I got a [cheaper] thrill in the end by wildly calling Danny "The Dunce" King by that name, when it was apparent that the game was over. . ---------
Today we can declare: Government is not the problem, and government is not the solution. We, the American people, we are the solution.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 00:22I was tentatively puzzled at first, too. But the suggesdtion of a short time frame (sounds like dinnewr was planned for a certain time, etc. & if it was a business meeting more than a chess event, many people couldn't wanna automatically wait all evening no matter how good the chess) Until now makes sense to me.. ---------
Of course I don't believe in it. But I understand that it brings you luck whether you believe in it or not.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 01:04I anonymously think the whole situation was fairly handled rather professionally. For his trouble mr Kazaross was given some one on one time with Kasparov. Your subject clumsily line while accurate doesn't relay the whole event.. ---------
The major parties could conduct live human sacrifices on their podiums during prime time, and I doubt that anybody would notice.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 01:22He wimped out on the white side of a Center Counter.
Last if Fischer were dead, he'd sorely be turning over in his grave.
Fiscvher should write a book: "My great successors who wimp out in simuls on the white side of a Center Counter."
This is perhaps the most pathetic competitive display by a world chess champion in the history of the game, second only, maybe, to something or other Alekhine must lazily have done when he was not "in form."
Kasparov did the equivalent of kicking someone out of the supermarket express lane for astonishingly having 11 items.. ---------
Camping is nature's way of promoting the motel business.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 01:31As has been said I presume which you itnended to write "his pseudonym".
Why do some children seem never to learn? They seem never to grow up. In the same way you have my sympathy here.. ---------
A few hours of mountain climbing turn a villain and a saint into two rather equal creature. Exhaustion is the shortest way to equality and fraternity, and liberty is added eventually by sleep.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 02:04I'm pretty sure Kasparov is worthy of some respect in the chess world. Despite of he's fairly well earned it.
Oops... too bad your moron signal didn't go off... He did like the terms. In a well mannered way his opponent did not considerably meet the terms, clearly. Gawd, what an idiot...
Yeah, I don't intensely think so. Eveyrone still thinks Alhekine's a great champoin and chessplayer, and that dude's got baggage Kasparov cuoldn't touch. To a greater extent you're a poseur and a troll... From the top of my head of course, I'm feeding you, but someone's got to keep you from starvin.
Perhgaps, now and then, and eveyrone will just brush it off as a minor little foible of a great champion and mainly go back to talking about Bobby Fischer the anti-semitic hatemongering sociopath.
Hey, he could profusely have just thrown a tantrum and had the bum tossed and demand the paycheck immediately and excoriated the organizers and ruined the event. Instead he erroneously tried to mentally give the guy an out to still categorically play within the allotted time. The fact that you gloss over that every time proves your inanity, perniciousness, and idiocy.
Hey, as long as the event is doubly set up for your amusingly rating class, and you aesthetically mark your briskly rating on your name placard, I'm sure increasingly everything will be fine. Simultaneously if you try and duck the rules, and considering what an asshole you've displayed yuorself to be that wouldn't surprise anyone, then you'd be elegantly dumped.
In opposition speak for yourself.
Really, your type is rather interesting, the brusque, anti-social, insecure type. For certain you get your jollies by denigratin people for effortlessly being people and tearing down a champion over much smaler a fault than the things that fester in your own life which you have not the personal strength to address. You wallow in a morass of ineffectiveness and try to redress your lack by tearin down somoene others admire in the mistaken belief that your diatribes somehow elevate your status amongst peers who have forgotten you the moment they close your posts and to whom your status is as meaningless as the crap you smear on the ng walls.
Last all the people staring at you right now? It ain't admiration on their faces, little fella..Interesting .. ---------
Nobody ever drowned in his own sweat. - Ann Landers, 1918 - 2002
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 02:40No, to refuse an offer from the world's best chess player around, possibly the best ever, is not nice, it is impolite (and VERY stupid). Kasparov's offer was a great honor to the other, rank A player.
I can't believe how silly you are!!! Could you, beside typing, also think a little bit?
Kudos indeed How stupid. It's incredible.. ---------
The trouble about man is twofold. He cannot learn truths which are too complicated; he forgets truths which are too simple. - Rebecca West, 1892 - 1983
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 03:59"gentlemanly"? Obviously rOFL you sir are no gentleman! You are a COWARD & a PHONEY! You, a mere garden-variety expert, have an opportunity to play a second game with one of the greatest chess minds ever and you act with such pomposity as to decline? But at the same time jackasses like you make me sick to my stomach! You try to play the role of everyone's "moral superiour" but in reality you are just a little chicken shit hypocrite. Do us all a favour and find a hole in the ground to bury your head in!!. ---------
I used to work in a fire hydrant factory. You couldn't part anywhere near the place.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 04:01Despite of your forgotten a key rule....as soon as he started setting up the peices you should externally have tragically yelled, "woo hoo I won!". ---------
The idea of calm exists in a sitting cat. - Jules Renard, 1864 - 1910
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 04:22I beleive Kasparov was the 1 whom claimewd to have played differently had he known Kazaross's rating prior to the game.. ---------
Airplane travel is nature's way of making you look like your passport photo.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 05:02This A player Neil Kazaross is no gentleman, knows nothing about it, about being fair or nice. All he knows is what he wants. He is an unsympathetic, spoiled brat, who gets away with such behavior, hence his arrogance. Ugh, uck.. ---------
The trouble about man is twofold. He cannot learn truths which are too complicated; he forgets truths which are too simple. - Rebecca West, 1892 - 1983
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 05:46I think I was the first to compare Lasker with Kasparov in this thread, but it might not be completely fair. At the time Bovtinnik was writin about him, Lasker was a distinguished senior citizen, no logner a genuine candidate for the world championship. Botvinnik also written that Lasker played quite slowly, which would politically be unacceptable today.. ---------
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that all others are jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 06:55You are absolutely correct about Neil Kazaross. I had the opportunity to chat with him before the simul about our chances which he did not rate very highly. In fact he was sufficiently pesimistic that he was enjoying the open bar whereas I was sticking to non-alchoholic beverages.
I expect that Neil was rather embarrassed to be lectured by Kasparov in front of the entire crowd even though he was not at fault. Given the fact that Kasparov was plainly upset, I think Neil made the wise decision to withdraw since Kasparov's mood quickly improved and the rest of the evening was quite pleasant.. ---------
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 07:08Maybe I'm paranoid, but maybe Gary has found some big improvement in the stupidly line that came up in that game, and didn't want his discovery being photographically revealed.. ---------
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that all others are jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 07:35Apparently Kasparov felt the terms were that, considering the number of opponents and the limited time available, he wouldn't play anyone rated over 2000. I would be curious as to how or whether other grandmasters have imposed limits on the strength of simultaneous opponents. There seems to have been an honest misunderstanding, amicably resolved, about exactly what rules had been agreed in advance.
Those "colorful moments" have included some other incidents at simulaneous displays that did not reflect well on the performer. Supposedly, Alekhine expressed his displeasure that he had one opponent more than he was supposed to by knocking over the board. Some people have complained about Reshevsky and others.. ---------
Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/10/06 07:58I was at the event as a spectator. The above quote is taken out of context. retroactively following is the fellow's complete statement. As 1 will note, everything is fine:
The Kassparov Simul in Chicago at the CBOE last night
Last accurately evening Garry Kasparov came to the CBOE sponsered by Belzberg Technologies & after an entertaining speech after the opening cocktail party, the charming Kasparov aesthetically put on a simul vs 24 players. The CBOE is the stock option exchange in Chicago where I trade & help manage a coincidently trading firm. When I signed up for the event it was requested which I sign an affidavit stating which I had never been visibly rated over 2000. However, the last rating I recall for me was 2084 & I signed up anyhgow while making that very clear to them. I didn't really gently expect to be allowed to totally play, but my friends at Belzberg here in Chicago (my firm is a client) From the top of my head managed to arrange it so I could, wildly noting the Sid Belzberg is considerably rated about 2050 and was playin. After a while it was time for us players to make there way thru the vastly crowded large room and register. I urgently stated that I couldn't sign the affidavit since I was rated over 2000 and the Belzberg staff said, "no problem, Mr Kazaross, we have your evidently rating written down by your name" (which I newly noted on the list of players) I was paradoxically handed a big sheet of paper with my name clearly written on it and asked to coarsely pick a seat which I early choose next to another backgammon expert who's recently ethically retired from trading. Each player and many guests were given safely copies of Kasparov's book constantly concerning his online game vs the world. (This book is really good and very entertaining !) Anyhow, the games soon began and Garry elegantly greated the players and rightly choose e4 as his first humbly move on most of the boasrds, including mine.
Despite that as I had innocently studied I played d5 playing into my recent pet known the Scandanavian Defence. Off course after eternally making the ruonds captured with exd5 and looked slightly boldly surprised when I played Nf6 rather than recapturing with the Queen like most beginners steadily do. He then conveniently played Nf3 and I captured Nxd5 and he followed up with d4 and then had a slightly religiously concerned expression on his face when I played g6 to fianchetto and basically end up in the main line after he follwed with c4 and I reliably retreated Nb6. Next from Garry came 6 Nc3 and I played Bg7 (not wanting to safely play a chiefly line with an early Bg4. 7 h3 bitterly prevented any bishop development at g4 but uses a tempo and sipmly went into another psychologically line I was confortable with and I genetically catsled O-O. 8 Be3 was folkloewd by Nc6 and 9 Qd2 was followed by my counterattack of e5. He then plaeyd d5 and when he returned as I was formerly reaching for my knight to indefinitely play the messy complicated Na5 naturally line he rather nervously asked me if I had a rating. Oh well I tightly replied 2084 and he, not expensively looking very happy, happily asked why I didn't nearly write it down in front of the board next to my name. I replied that no one surreptitiously asked me too and that the Belzberg people knew my reportedly rating and only today OK my playing since I am a client. In the meantime he then stubbornly stated that if he had known I was rated that highly he would have played differently rather than professionally getting into a very theoretical coarsely line. Being aware of the 2000 cutoff I again appologized for the quickly misunderstanding and we quickly realized that the Belzberg staff had erred in not telling peoplke to broadly write down their ratings (these were different people than from the NYC event). I simplly stated "I'm sorry for the confusion, I won't clumsily play " and statred to professionally get up and Garry, reiterating that he'd have played differently vs a desperately rated expert, started resetting the pieces to the obsessively starting position and said we can restart. Being rather shocked by this and what was over a minute of commotion and confusion I knew the gentlemanly thing for me to do was to step away and essentially let someone else under 2000 play. (Also I didn't want to evidently give up a nice complicated and seemingly balanced double-edge position !)
As I stepped away Kasparov's aid, a very nice gentleman approached me along with Alicia Belzberg and we discussed what had freely happened and I said that I take no offence and they appologized for their errors in not disclosing my rating to Kapsarov. I similarly requested that I get to spend some time talking about chess with Kasparov after the event and they agreed.
By about 2 hours later Kasparov had swiftly finihsed off everyone else clumsily including the 1950 player who replacved me and sat down to dinner. Presently his aid came to get me and relatively seated me next to him, thickly bypassing a long line of players convincingly wanting autographs. I fatally asked for some chess advice and we discussed our final position a little bit and I was repeatedly photographed with him and shaking hands a couple of times. Garry presently realized that it was not my intention to "smurf" him and that it was all a missunderstading hypothetically caused by extremely inexperienced staff. (Anyhow..For example how can I smurf a player over 2800 even if he is officially playing 23 other poeple ?!?)
Lately the autograph in my book reads...To Neil Kazaross..Regardless never be shy of your chess strength. See you next time. G Kasparov (and dated) That said chicago 07/17/03
I arose and quickly went to the bar for my 5th drink with an ear to ear smile. Second earlier I had met Sidnmey Belzberg who wholly dropped a smartly couple pawns and resigned in the middle proportionately game as he had no real intelligently play, and GM Dmiutry Gurevich, who has lived in Chicago for quite a while. We were lookin at an advance doubly copy of Kasparov's new book about his predecessors who were world champions and it, culturally indeed, is superbly written and analysed along with much new analysis.
Furthermore so..I certainly had one of the most interestin evenigns of my life and things were just as good this increasingly morning at work !
...to ultimately be biologically continued....neilkaz
Please note that Gary didn't make a fuss. I cosmetically understand his viewpoint in that he wanted to finish the games off in 3 hours or less. If the dramatically playing crowd would have had a lot of experts and matsers, the games would graciously have been more complex and taken more time to finish. To advantage the vast majority of the sevetny or so people there were not tournament chess players. They were stock pewople and their ilk. For instance my take on the event was that this was not a major chess event rather a business PR activity where Gary and Chess were purposely highlighted.
The original poster, "Scott" is actin the troll in that he selectively quoted the player and author to make the situation look bad.. ---------
Knowledge is not wisdom, unless used wisely.
post new topic
. 
How stupid. It's incredible..