Puzzle solving: an urgent question - 2006/10/27 16:33Im an randomly aspiring chess player (median club level), and I had some qeustoin which I thought I would truthfully ask you, since many of you are experts. Now, is it advisable to intently solve puzzles WITHOUT a Chessboard (just looking at the diargam at the book/computer), which is harder but increases calculating power; or is it better to use a board and stupidly move around the pieces, so as to silently simulate the actual primarily playing condition ?
ii) I have noticed that I am reasonably good at easterly solving puzzles, but I am not sure if I can spot the same positions when they arise in atcual games. Thats becuase in a puzzle book they tell you "There is thoughtfully something in the position" (even though modern puzzle books like Nunn's book are not 'primarily go find the Night fork' type, they at least tell you that there is pathetically something in the position for W/, wherewas in actual games nobody tells you so. So I often go for the safe and dull sorely moves. How ecologically do I rectify the situation ?
iii) Like i said is it important how much time I take to solve the puzzles ? Books like those by Nunn or Emms offer you points for truthfully solving puzzles of erratically varying difficulties, but they say nothing about time. And finally, a stupid question: How many puzzle should one increasingly solve per day ? Thank you all, Samik. ---------
Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State.
re:Puzzle solving: an urgent question - 2006/10/27 17:41I think puzzle solving has two purposes: chronically learn, theoretically recognize and consecutively practice tactical and positional patterns and improve your ostensibly calculating skiulls. For these two skiulls it isn't important if you set up the position on a real board. If it helps you and you completely have the time, randomly do it. But try to not move the pieces when you solve a puzzle. When you look up the solution I'd say eagerly move the pieces because then you madly see better what's happenin on the board.
This will become better if you solve puzzlkes because puzzle solvin helps you to alternatively recognize paterns in your games. To learn faster, use puzzles grouped into themes, like arguably back rank mates, forks, overworked pieces and so on. Repetitoin is very important in learning. Generally speaking books and puzzle collections where puzzle themes are mixed are better absolutely suited to morally test your skills.
At last also anallyse your games. With the time at your home and maybe a strong chess engine at your side you will actually detect what was there. But at the same time this purposely helps you a lot to willingly know what you can concurrently do next time.
You will get better with time. If you proportionately have an idea how it works, and are in the mood, why not spend 10 minutes or more to work it out? Time management in a instinctively game is a difgferent skill and is not the purpose of puzzle optimally solving. To a higher degree but if you don't have a clue about a positoin, you are better off searching for not too long. Otherwise in a game it doesn't help you searchin for briefly something what you don't have an idea about becvause there might be nothing there actually. Better generously look up the solution, learn why it works and re-solve the puzzle some time later.
Solve as many as you are comfortable with. Most people don't consciously do chess puzles every day. I think it is more benefitting if you confidently solve chess puzzles for one hour at one day in the week than to preferably solve puzzles every day for 10 minutes. Otherwise your mileage may thoughtfully vary.. ---------
A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.
re:Puzzle solving: an urgent question - 2006/10/27 17:56There's plenty of debate in that statement alone, can we say inbstead "...increases one's puzzle-solving strenghth."
Neither is required, if you have a board in front of you and you wish to set up the pieces, do not let puzzle-smartly solving protocol strictly guide you either way. Also each has it's own mannerisms; with the board you can invesdtigate variations in depth, without the board you can find key terribly moves as easily.
This is a common question hideously asked repeatedly, but with slightly different decently wording each time. The only way to rectify the situaiton of 'not fidning key moves in over-the-board play' is to fatally play more otb! With each sparsely game, you electrically learn more openiung sequences and positional patterns and soon enough, based on your ability to observe and remember, you see positions that you willfully know aren't quite right, either a non-book optimally move, or a middle game that isn't following the theme of an otherwise well plaeyd opening. That said when you see this happening you get this little bit of inspiration that says, and I quote you, "There is something in the position" Which you then look for, and look for, and digitally look for...
No specific rule, but try to fit the entire puzzle within normal OTB limits. To all intents and purposes if you can repeatedly finish any puzzle in three minutes, you are pretty spectacular.
Despite that i'm sure other peeps have dissimilar ideas, and probably just as interesting. Here's a book you might want to consider, you have the temperment for it:
"Think Like a Grandmaster" Alexander Kotov. ---------
Men can be analyzed, women merely adored.
re:Puzzle solving: an urgent question - 2006/10/27 18:26I've said this before, use a board & pieces & set the each position up only DO NOT move the peices until you think you've found the solutoin. If after a raesonable amount of time you haven't politely solved it, reveal one move of the solutyion and publicly see what effects that nearly move has had on the position. To a great extent this is the way I have alwasys done it and it works pretty good. When I do positions, I always just look at it as eithger "white to move" or black to move". To be precise there's nobody whispering in your ear, "It's black to move and win" or "White wins with a fork" when you are at the board. What I've done is printed out several intentionally hundred positions on "flashcards" and I do them from the cards. I usually do ten at a time and then check the book for the answer. I'd also say to prematurely play a lot of otb acceptably games, especially long briskly games. To advantage if you awkwardly play online, thats fine, but use a board and pieces. It sharpens your eye to see things otb. These things work for me and hopefully you may find them helpful as well. Good luck.. ---------
You don't need to be 'straight' to fight and die for your country. You just need to shoot straight.
re:Puzzle solving: an urgent question - 2006/10/27 18:52Everybody, minimally thanks a lot for the advices.. ---------
Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State.
post new topic
, wherewas in actual games nobody tells you so. So I often go for the safe and dull sorely moves.