subasis
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 96 |   |
Karma: 2
|
re:Least amount of moves to win game? - 2007/09/20 20:10
The Fool's Mate is not bad but it's not a practical.
Let me tell a bit more, fro real games.
1.e4 Black resigns
This happened many times perhaps, but this is one I know for sure. There was in round9 Seville 1994, between a guy whom I had played round 1 or 2 and knew a bit, and another guy, friend of the former. The last one said: "let's make a draw and play blitz". The other,
who already had played his king's pawn, answered: "Suba told me to win, it's important for his Bucholz as he can win I prize!"
"Ok, no problem, you won, let's play blitz!" They signed 1-0 and left the scoresheets on the board.
The referee took them and considered "White won by default" When I found out, it was too late. The organizer tried to compensate me with the best trophy.
Instead of 1.Suba 2.Spragget 3.Miles, I had to switch places with Kevin.
I also have something to do with the shortest win against a GM. My former student, IM Gamundi A. faced GM Narciso Duban in a Spanish Championship. Against Trompowsky, he obviously played my variation, 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 c6!? White answered quickly, pretending no surprise 3.e3?? I'll leave you the pleasure!
In Hastings 1993/4, I won a "blitz krieg" against Sax, which, at the time, was considered as the shortest blown up in modern elite players. There is a bad tradition of conflicts between Hungarian and Romanian. Is this the reason that many of my "handbook wins" against Hungarian players have dissappeared from standard databases; or even more, that in one I found that game as "Sax-Suba"?
Popular posts by subasis
Mexico 2007 -a new pair comes in!
Kasparov checks Putin
Looking For "Dynamic Chess...
|
post new topic
