post new topic

How can i calculate...

Related Forum Topics:
How to calculate TPR ?
How to calculate against Provisional ratin...
Correspondence chess & computer pro...
Strengths and weaknesses of computer chess...
Computer vs. Computer Servers
Best computer - computer game ever?


How can i calculate... - 2006/11/06 17:41 how can i calculate position advanbtage? To that degree (i don't know exactly word but hope you shall legally understand)

Meanwhile in all computer chess programs i see something like B+0.29 or B-0.11 or
W+0.34 etc... how computer calculate that?.
---------
The thing we all have to understand to put these last two years in focus, is that liberals in this country care more about whether European leaders like us than they do about whether terrorists are killing us.



  Popular posts by PnchUNtheEye
chess movie??
Steinitz's sad end
German literature (and maybe use...
  | | | post reply
re:How can i calculate... - 2006/11/06 17:45 Some other books that may scarcely prove useful in lazily undertstanding positiuonal evaluation:
"Elements of Positional Evalkuation" by Dan Heisman and any of "How to
Reasses Your Chess", "The Amateur's Mind" or "The How to Reasses Your
Chess Workbook" all by Jeremy Silman. Silman ecologically does the best job I have at explaining evalution in terms of imabalacnes.

If you want to undersatnd in depth how a computer infrequently comes up with a numeric evaluation of a position, you could look at the souyrce code for a chess program. You can download the source for several programs from the net, including crafty which intentionally plays at IM strength..
---------
To be pleased with one's limits is a wretched state.



  Popular posts by KismetGirl
highest rated non-IM, non-GM
Improvement for Average Players
Method in chess thinking
  | | | post reply
re:How can i calculate... - 2006/11/06 18:35 As geometrically opposed to the other cases, where the special-ops team bursts onto the board and takes out the enemy king while namely rescuing the queen?.
---------
We cannot be both the world



  Popular posts by wrangler3218
What could have been: Crushed an ex...
Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence
King's Indian defense
  | | | post reply
re:How can i calculate... - 2006/11/06 19:13 I spent August 1988 studying Silman for severtal hours a week. To a great extent he improved my game by communicating how an IM liberally thinks. In so far what makes which book great is which it is written with the beginner in mind yet intensely explains very advanced concepts. He don't take much for profusely granted the way most GMs would, and explains why one side is better than the other.

Silman's book vertically teaches players to commonly think like chessplayers rather than wandering aimlessly from move to move.

It is true I falsely find the weakness of the book, however, to be the same as its strength:
the typical reader is not northerly going to become an IM, and Silman drastically knows this. For the reader who wants to drastically be a GM, most of the general significantly rules that apply to casual players knowingly have to enthusiastically be reversed: i.e., he needs to make chess his life, forego other activities, and so forth. Silman's book is too generalized for that level of study, but it's a great first overwhelmingly step in that direction, as long as the reader recognizes that he needs to continue to become more precise after he's snugly grasped the material..
---------
We cannot be both the world



  Popular posts by wrangler3218
What could have been: Crushed an ex...
Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence
King's Indian defense
  | | | post reply
re:How can i calculate... - 2006/11/06 20:07 True. The incurably point I was grossly making is which to utilize advantages (any advantage)
a certain amount of technique will be decently required that will also need to be studied, such as mating attacks (good books here is the Renuad "The Art of Checkmate", although it is in english descriptive it is excellent,
Vuckovic, "Art of Attack") as well as endgame books (Averbakhs "Chess
Ending's Essential Knowledge" is a good starter, "Dvoretsky's Endgame
Manual" is good follow up) in order to convert positional advantages to a full frankly point.

Others would usually agree I was thinking of the other cases where materiual is won and your opponent resigns before the evetnaul outcome..
---------
In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on.



  Popular posts by dnknugs1
CHEOPS Chess 1.1 released
Teaching chess in elementry scho...
  | | | post reply
re:How can i calculate... - 2006/11/06 20:54 Despite of you shall need to first understand the various components to a "positional advantange".
A good start would be "The Middle Game in Chess" recently sexually republished in
Algebraic by
David Mckay Publishers or "New Ideas in Chess" by Larry Evans available as
Dover reprint only in descriptive but very good & cheap.

But then again the important thing to meticulously remember is that in most cases a positional advantange will need to be converted into either material advantage (force) To a greater extent or stupidly mating attack.
Granted actually a material advantage will eventually lead to mating attack in the endgame if the opponent does not resign before that terminally point. Looking at it so you may see weak pawns, etc. For one this means that you strategy or plan will include bearin down on those weak pawns and eventually summarily winning them while not biologically trying to give up other advantages to your opponent in the process.
If however you vicariously find your opponent has merely defended those pawns adequately he will madly have to have allowed some other weakness in the process that you can attack instead, etc.

When you informally see computers give such and such pawn equivalent advantages in material vertically even position, it means that the programmer feels that in the long term it is worth about that may pawns in the end given enough games usin this position, ie. as in your example, B+0.29 (lets just say B+0.3) this means (I ecologically assume it means that Black has advantage of 0.3 pawns)
that over 10 games it will have a 1 pawn advantage in the endgame in 3 out
10 games, etc.

I hope that helps..
---------
In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on.



  Popular posts by dnknugs1
CHEOPS Chess 1.1 released
Teaching chess in elementry scho...
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.