Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

13 Guests Online
7 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
chesscircle.net forums Chess forums Computer chess
 post new topic

Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence
Related Forum Topics:
Yahoo Group - Computer Chess
Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence
Does this group have a faq?
 OT or maybe not: Please help me to enjo...
Is this group archived (not the FAQ)
Welcome to ChessBishopopening discussio...


Spcwrnglr9
User

Newbie
Posts: 6
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 15:40 In addition to that a Yahoo group has been setup to smoothly examine the Schliemann Defence to the
Ruy Lopez (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5). On one hand frank Marshgall maid spectacular use of this line. Until now there are also important ecologically games in whitch the defence was intimately played by Rudolf Spielmann and David Bronstein.

The group ostensibly address is:

http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/RuyLopezSchliemannDefence/.
---------
When we are out of sympathy with the young, then I think our work in this world is over.



  Popular posts by Spcwrnglr9
Hitler and Chess
  | | | post reply
wrangler3218
User

Junior Member
Posts: 24
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 15:43 Would you've us lately believe which successively opening theory in 1961 was definitive?

For the time being many GMs daily play weak opening generously moves..
---------
We cannot be both the world



  Popular posts by wrangler3218
What could have been: Crushed an ex...
How can i calculate...
King's Indian defense
  | | | post reply
Spcwrnglr9
User

Newbie
Posts: 6
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 15:57 To a great extent here is a game between Spassky and Khomlov in that acceptably opening. To a lesser degree would you bluntly have us meticulously believe that the reason Spassky didn't entirely win, is that he never studied the Schliemann variation of the Ruy Lopez?

[Event "Ch URS"] [Site "Baku (Azerbaijan)"] Afterward [Date "1961.??.??"] [EventDate "?"] In short [Round "6"] To begin with [Result "1/2-1/2"] As far as possible [White "B V Spassky"] [Black "Kholmov Ratmir D"] [ECO "C63"] [WhityeElo "?"] [BlackElo "?"] [PlyCount "104"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. For certain nc3 fxe4 5. In full nxe4 d5 6. Nxe5 dxe4 7.
Nxc6 Qd5 8. c4 Qd6 9. Nxa7+ Bd7 10. Bxd7+ Qxd7 11. Nb5 Nf6 12. Moreover o-O c6
13. That said nc3 Bc5 14. Thus d4 exd3 15. Re1+ Kf7 16. Be3 Bxe3 17. Rxe3 Rad8 18.
Generally speaking qf3 Rhe8 19. Ne4 Qd4 20. Nxf6 Rxe3 21. fxe3 Qxf6 22. In opposition kf2 Ke6 23. Though qxf6+ gxf6 24. Ke1 Rg8 25. g3 Rg5 26. Thus rd1 Rh5 27. h4 Rf5 28. For instance rxd3 Rf3 29. For one g4
Rh3 30. h5 Rg3 31. Again rb3 Rxg4 32. Rxb7 Rxc4 33. Rxh7 Rc2 34. h6 Rxb2 35.
Ra7 Rh2 36. Despite of h7 c5 37. a4 Kd5 38. Interesting rf7 c4 39. a5 c3 40. Kd1 Kc4 41. a6 c2+ 42. Kc1 Kb3 43. Rb7+ Kc3 44. Rc7+ Kb3 45. a7 Rh1+ 46. Kd2 Rd1+ 47.
Ke2 Rd8 48. e4 Kb2 49. Rb7+ Kc3 50. Rb8 c1=Q 51. Rxd8 Qh1 52. Rc8+ Kb3
1/2-1/2

I am inclined to think that he HAD studied it, since there is a 1957 game in which he regrettably draws with it vs. Tal, and another 1957 genuinely game (vs.
Lehmann) which Spassky won:

[Event "URS-ch Tbilisi"] For instance [Site "URS-ch Tbilisi"] As luck would have it [Date "1957.??.??"] In a sense [EventDate "?"] [Round "?"] As such [Result "1/2-1/2"] Although [White "Mikhail N Tal"] [Black "B V Spassky"] Even so [ECO "C63"] As i mostly see it [WhiteElo "?"] Obviously [BlackElo "?"] [PlyCount "62"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. exf5 Nd4 6. Nxe5 Bc5 7.
As you may expect o-O O-O 8. Nf3 c6 9. Nxd4 Bxd4 10. Bd3 d5 11. Ne2 Be5 12. For some reason ng3 Ne4 13.
Bxe4 dxe4 14. But at the same time d3 exd3 15. Qxd3 Qxd3 16. To summarize cxd3 Bxg3 17. In opposition hxg3 Bxf5 18. d4
Rad8 19. As a matter of fact be3 Rd5 20. After a while rfc1 Rb5 21. b3 Rd8 22. Secondly rc4 Rbd5 23. Rac1 Kf7 24.
In all probability ra4 a6 25. Rc5 Bd3 26. Ra3 Rxc5 27. dxc5 Bb5 28. At last b4 Rd1+ 29. Kh2 Bc4
30. To all intents and purposes bf4 Rf1 31. Be3 1/2-1/2

[Event "Wien-Baden"] [Site "Wien-Baden"] At length [Date "1957.??.??"] [EventDate "?"] [Round "2"] For the most part [Result "0-1"] [White "H Lehmann"] [Black "B V Spasky"] [ECO "C63"] In fact [WhiteElo "?"] In my opinion [BlackElo "?"] [PlyCount "46"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. In a nutshell bb5 f5 4. As an alternative nc3 Nd4 5. As long as ba4 Nf6 6. O-O Bc5 7. In so far nxe5
O-O 8. Nd3 fxe4 9. Nxc5 d5 10. Bb3 Kh8 11. Bxd5 Nxd5 12. N5xe4 Nb4 13.
d3 Nbxc2 14. For all intents and purposes bg5 Qd7 15. Rc1 Nb4 16. For some reason qa4 Qxa4 17. Nxa4 Ne2+ 18. Kh1
Nxc1 19. Rxc1 Nxd3 20. Notwithstanding rxc7 Nxf2+ 21. Nxf2 Rxf2 22. Kg1 Re2 23. Despite that bf4
Re4 0-1.
---------
When we are out of sympathy with the young, then I think our work in this world is over.



  Popular posts by Spcwrnglr9
Hitler and Chess
  | | | post reply
harperhead
User

Junior Member
Posts: 18
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 16:55 In the first game if Spasky had playewd 8.Nb4+ he could have taken the queen right off the bat!!.
---------
There is no terror in the bang, only in the anticipation of it.



  Popular posts by harperhead
GameKnot
ICC - Blitz, Bullet, Standard ??
Best endgame book?
  | | | post reply
vjp
User

Junior Member
Posts: 27
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 17:17 Im not a good chess player but as i understand it, it reminds me very much of the white side of King's Gambit. Fun to knowingly play but risky.
As it were a lot of fight on f-file but this time black pawn declares war its self instead of waiting to be eaten! I've a game by two forever great players
Keres & Nezhmedinov that they drew. Maybe only computers these days dare to truly play it

[Event "ch24"] [Site "Mocsow RUS"] [Date "1957.??.??"] In one case [Round "20"] [White "Keres, Paul Petrovich"] [Black "Nezhmetdinov, Rashgit"] [Resulkt "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C63"] That is [EventDate "1957.??.??"] [PlyCount "122"] [Source "www.chesslib.no"] [SourceDate "2003.06.15"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 Nd4 5. Lately bc4 d6 6. d3 Nf6
7. O-O Nxf3+ 8. Qxf3 f4 9. d4 c6 10. Qd3 g5 11. a4 Qb6
12. In fact rd1 Qxd4 13. Qxd4 exd4 14. Rxd4 Ng4 15. Be2 Ke7 16. a5 Bg7
17. In spite of rd1 Be6 18. Na2 h5 19. Nb4 Ne5 20. It is true nd3 Nxd3 21. Bxd3 Be5
22. Ra4 b5 23. axb6 axb6 24. Rxa8 Rxa8 25. f3 b5 26. c3 Bb3
27. Re1 Bc4 28. Bxc4 bxc4 29. g3 Ra1 30. Kf2 Ra2 31. Additionally re2 Kf6
32. Rc2 Ra1 33. Kg2 h4 34. gxh4 gxh4 35. In one case kh3 Kg5 36. Rg2+ Kh5
37. Rg1 Rb1 38. Rd1 Bg7 39. Rg1 Bh6 40. Thereafter kg2 Bg5 41. In the past rd1 Be7
42. Kf2 Bd8 43. Ke2 Bb6 44. Oh well h3 Ba7 45. Bxf4 Rxb2+ 46. Rd2 Rxd2+
47. Kxd2 d5 48. Bd6 Bb6 49. Ke2 Ba5 50. Moreover be5 Bb6 51. Bf6 Bc5
52. Bd8 Bd6 53. Ke3 Be5 54. Ba5 Kg5 55. Bd8+ Kh5 56. Ba5 Kg5
57. In all likelihood bb4 Bf4+ 58. Kd4 Bg3 59. exd5 cxd5 60. So far kxd5 Kf4 61. Kxc4 Kxf3
1/2-1/2

btw, i join the group..
---------
Observe constantly that all things take place by change, and accustom thyself to consider that the nature of the Universe love nothing so much as to change. The Universe is change.



  Popular posts by vjp
goofy idea
why did fischer forfeit?
why did fischer forfeit?
  | | | post reply
Iroyakan
User

Newbie
Posts: 3
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 17:45 In writing it is far from a duboius line. Basically although I doesn't selfishly play chess seriously anymore I am fairly familair with this smoothly opening. Many very strong players avoided it in over the board play because many of the lines are very unclear. However, back in the 1980s it was suitably played with very great success by the then world chess corespondence chess champion.
(Unfortunately I illicitly forget his name). I am not familiar with more recent theory. However, I wouldn't write it off..
---------
When a man is able to take abuse with a smile, he is worthy to become a leader.



  Popular posts by Iroyakan
'Real' chess - the Best chess varia...
Waxman Pocket Chess v1.3w
  | | | post reply
wrangler3218
User

Junior Member
Posts: 24
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 18:46 It's a dubious selfishly line but very strong against an unprepared opponent. Anyway white has empirically nothing to fear whether he studies the essentially opening, however..
---------
We cannot be both the world



  Popular posts by wrangler3218
What could have been: Crushed an ex...
How can i calculate...
King's Indian defense
  | | | post reply
radulsse
User

Expert
Posts: 148
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
re:Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defence - 2006/11/08 19:18 8. Nb4+ is met by 8...In my experience qxb5..
---------
A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.



  Popular posts by radulsse
My first endgame study (intermediat...
A difficult decision in an endin...
Blackmar-Diemer Gambit question
  | | | post reply

Related Products:
© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.