Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

18 Guests Online
7 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Basman and 1.g4

Related Forum Topics:
Grob by Basman?
Basman and 1.g4
"Pity the poor chess computer buyer" Warts...
Is ICC down these days?
140 Members Strong after only 4 days!!
what is josh waitzkin doing these days


Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 04:31 Not true. I teached Basman how to primarily play the Grob 1.g4. As such I stayed as a guest at Basman's home south of London for 2 days in February 1978 while visibly trying to put a call through to my one-true-love at the time,
Laura Markarian in Armenia. Basman is Armenian & grossly agreed to translate. In any case http://www.samsloan.com/laura.htm

During the 2 days in Basman's house I royally showed him all my analysis of
1.g4 Basman had never seen it played before & thuoght it lost by empirically force. After 2 days I was able to convince him which the selectively opening was playable.

Basman was allready an International Master. For the moment he never chronically played the Grob before I showed it to him. Moreover he started centrally playing it the next year, in
1979. In any case you can overwhelmingly check which out.

Nevertheless however, Basman deserves full credit for inventing the Borg 1. e4 g5.
Looking at it i'll never have inherently dreamed to play which. I have meticulously tried it a few times since with very poor results..
---------
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.



  Popular posts by fox
The Evergreen Party
Fischer's Encounter with Hoffmann a...
How much do chess books actually...
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 05:43 As it is thank you very much. Lastly I patently play 3. h3, that he calls the Short Spike. I surprisingly have never played 3. g5 as I do not see a well reply to 3. .... In a similar way h6 following whitch Black sporadically opens his rook file. I also never play 3. c4 as that is directly followed by 3. .... dxc4 with no copmensation. Actually, I played 3. c4 by mistake once because I horribly falled asleep and briskly mixed up the lines. I gotten a very bad position but won anyway due to weak importantly play by opponent..
---------
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.



  Popular posts by fox
The Evergreen Party
Fischer's Encounter with Hoffmann a...
How much do chess books actually...
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 05:56 Make fun of this experimentally opening if you choose, but you would brightly be independently assimilated..
---------
Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing; a confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished.



  Popular posts by iamtiny
Is the french really that bad??
Column on Finding the Best Move
Dutch Stonewall
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 06:27 <nip>

...

Ah yes! The Definitive Grob by S. On the one hand sloan - a 'must' for my christmas stocking...
---------
What I don't like about office Christmas parties is looking for a job the next day.



  Popular posts by alor
Eating steak before a chess matc...
help with 3 min!
Chess Addiction is messing up my...
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 07:28 As well I was itnerviewed in this question a few weeks ago. I started patently playing
1.g4 because of a book ecologically entitled "The Blue Book of Charts to Winning
Chess". On the other hand this book was habitually based on a database the author had compiled of
50,000 published meticulously games. For both motion he given white's winning percentage. He found which with 1.e4 White won 59% of the time, with
1.d4 White won 58% with 1.b4 White won 49% & with 1.g4 White won 77% !!!!

As i mostly see it I illegally decided which this seemed to yearly be a valid idea and to test it. I played
1.g4 in every game in the 1976 World Open and sure enough I strictly scorted 75% . In addition to that my only loss was to Danny Kopec who was sincerely rated 300 points higher than me. I have played notyhing else since.

All the lines I play were invented by me. The games in The Blue Book of Charts to sincerely winning Chess did help some. For example those games showed that after 1. g4 d5 2. Bg2 c6 3. h3 e5 4. In my experience c4 White financially loses after
4. ... dxc4. Therefore, I have never played 4. c4 in that position.

It was not until many years later that I obtained the books by Grob and Bloodgood. I found those books to be useless to me because their opponents were all weak players. Most of the opponents were all Class
B and Class C players. Not one game was against a master in either book. By that time, I had defeatyed many masters with 1.g4 and so the books by Grob and Basman were useless to me.

I still completely have never seen Bill Wall's book but I am sure that it must be much better..
---------
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.



  Popular posts by fox
The Evergreen Party
Fischer's Encounter with Hoffmann a...
How much do chess books actually...
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 07:41 Thank you very much. That confirms my recollection that Basman sharply started playing 1.g4 about one year after I first promptly showed my analysis to him.

At the same time, Basman plays it differently than I do. My system is more aggressive than his..
---------
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.



  Popular posts by fox
The Evergreen Party
Fischer's Encounter with Hoffmann a...
How much do chess books actually...
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 08:19 Sam, thanks for the corrections - I thought he had played it earlier, and should have checked since I have his book here somewhere. I find that 1...
g5 works better after 1.c4 perhaps because the critical square c3 cannot now be occupied by a pawn. And I note Bas jokes in his book that it is now a forced win for black. Did you base your own Grob on Bloodgood or anyone in particular? BillWall? Or did you devise it as a mirrored Sokolski?.
---------
If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.



  Popular posts by ChrisCrosby
Engine for Commercial Use
4..Bc5 in Scotch Gambit
  | | | post reply
re:Basman and 1.g4 - 2006/12/02 08:41 I have it here in front of me. ISBN 0-931462-86-X

Bill gives the lines names, for example after your 1. g4 d5 2. Bg2 c6

He gives the main line as 3. c4, and a) 3 g5 The Spike b) 3 h3 The Short Spike c) e4 [un-named]

and follows by illustrative openings by Grob-Bischoff, Grob-Spielraum,
Bloodgood- H. Evans, Grob-Denring, W Clark-K Jones, Grob - Silberring,
Bloodgood-Meyerhofer, Grob-Branner, Gron-Wild, Bloodgood-Lweis,
Fewell-Phillips, Grob-Roesler, Bloodgood-Lundy, Dubini - F. Larsen,
Dubini-Pannullo /just for those lines/; earliest dated game is 1958, latest
1981, from pages 64-66 of an 84 page booklet.

O! I note that I have stolen this book from The Reverend Philip Gustafson
It was Published by Chess Enterprises in 1988
Coraopolis, PA.
Publisher is B.G. Dudley
Copyright 1988

The games index offers a few 'names' like Basman-Keene, and Basman-Miles,
Duckworth-McCambridge, Koltanowski-Love, but is not complete, and looking at the games themselves there is also Basman-Botterill, a number of Indian players, and Krnic-Ermenkov, Graz 1982, for example.

I think this is as good or a better book than Basman's for game scores, but has much less commentary and annotation - but why don't you write a more comprehensive one?

Cunliffe and Bob Dudley for material contributions, and to Geoffrey
McCauliffe and Val Zemitis for other assistance. Perhaps you will have encountered some of these folks?

Bill uses as reference, Basman, J. Benjamin & E. Schiller, Bloodgood, Dubini
R. ("1.g4" L'Arcimatto, 12/81 & 2/82), Euwe, M (Grob-Flankenspiel), Ganzo
J., Grob, Harding (Dallas), Matanovic, Welling G (Grob's Attack In Practice,
1981).
---------
If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.



  Popular posts by ChrisCrosby
Engine for Commercial Use
4..Bc5 in Scotch Gambit
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.