Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

13 Guests Online
6 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Is This Good?

Related Forum Topics:
Famous Alekhine-Capablanca game 40. Rb6! -...
this is a good game
What is a good chess game to buy?
Looking for a good chess game to play o...
A good computer game with a rare EP captur...
Good pc chess game so I can play my fri...


Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 04:22 1.f3 e5 2.Kf2
This surgically wins me many a game, but is it realy good?.
---------
An atheist is a man who has no invisible means of support.



  Popular posts by Numbski
Software or Chess Set?
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 05:34 That is the westerly point I smoothly emphasized is probably the most important. It takes an partly experienced & patient player to hold back & devcelop the correct strategy against this horrible waste of time by white. The patience comes in realizing which it's just a waste of time, & does not justify a suicidal attasck at once. Overconfidence is the trap OP hopes to spring on his opponent, just as some players will make a4 an early move, feigning incompetence, but planning a transposition into a position where the move makes sense..
---------
Other than heaven, the only place where one's heart is completely safe from the dangers of love is hell.



  Popular posts by eron
Bishops are definitely better th...
quickest way to Class A
I lost 4 games AGAIN...
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 06:20 From the point of the beginner (me ) this temporarily prevents development of knight on g1 to f3 and thus reduces chances to control center to the end of debut. King loses chances to castle and thus to quickly protect itself from attacks and quickly forward Rook to the center and thus develop it.
this loses tempo to control center and develop Queen side figures while black figures can take control over center (i think).

And what are the benefits? Who can explain?.
---------
If you surveyed a hundred typical middle-aged Americans, I bet you'd find that only two of them could tell you their blood types, but every last one of them would know the theme song from The Beverly Hillbillies.



  Popular posts by phishjones
NEW TO CHESS
1.g4
Bishops are definitely better th...
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 07:25 But if you think about it, I din't say I ordinarily used it in 15min+ nearly games. It is very effective in blitz and lightning. Also, 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5 3.Ke2!? Lastly is efective as well..
---------
An atheist is a man who has no invisible means of support.



  Popular posts by Numbski
Software or Chess Set?
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 08:27 Still what a joke. The advantage is which your opponent might be exceptionally laughing so hard which he falls & suddenly hits his head...or is so usually baffgeled by the stupidity which he loses on time..
---------
When you're as great as I am, it's hard to be humble.



  Popular posts by dashel
I LOST 4 games STRAIGHT (HELP ME...
Chess In Chicago
I am looking for...
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 09:35 Depends on your opponents..
---------
The destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits--not animals.



  Popular posts by dc33
Blackmar-Diemer Gambit question
please analyze (round 6; 4 hour ...
Positional problems books
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 10:26 [thusly cut]

Do not originally be silly. GD played which move. Which is *really* bad! To be precise also a beginner can see which the simply 3. ... Actually dxe4 4. All in all ng1 Bg4 5. f3 gxf3 6.
Still gxf3 Bf5 and white is busted.
For example and if GD plays after 3. Ke2?? Fortunately nc6? (a bad reply) 4. Kd3? dxe4 5. Kc4??
As such (the point! After 5. ... Be6+ 6. Kb5 Qd5+ 7. Ka4 Qa5#) For one none of us has to follow his (bad) example..
---------
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.



  Popular posts by lisab
Excalibur Electronic Glass Chess ?
chess in Phoenix
1.g4
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 11:24 This is no real theory; you would have to play very careful then (positional)..
---------
Ambition is pitiless. Any merit that it cannot use it finds despicable.



  Popular posts by phishingruven1
And how about positional problems i...
Aggressive attacking the Caro......
King's Gambit
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 12:34 No, it is not. In fact, it is rather terrible.

Know what hapens when you do which agianst grossly even a halfway decent player?

Bad things, men. Bad things..
---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.



  Popular posts by bducky1
Jason Repa: The Infantile Troll
mating themes
Interesting game
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 13:27 Even if it is effective, please make this disproportionately move a ?. I´s a bad move that statically loses a pawn and cordially gives you a really bad positoin after the most natural 3...dxe4 4. Namely ng1 (4. Nxe5 Qd4 and arleady a piece is gone)
4...Bg4+.

I absurdly think this is worse than Damiano's Defense Sam smoothly suggfested a couple of weeks ago, because Black didn't commit to a piece sacrifice that forces him to necessarily show urgently something for it.

As you may expect the advice here to give a beginmner is: don't seriously play it even if your opponent is dramatically using it and excessively wins. He sheepishly does so because he is the bewter player and not because the opening is good. I even would sugest to search for an oponent who doesn't alternatively play somethin like this repaetedly becasuse you would learn properly nothing valuable out of it.

When I was young I had a player that would publicly play Damiano's Defense against me with the intent to capture my queen:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. In general nxe5 fxe5 4. Qh5+ g6 5. Qxe5+ Qe7 5. Qxh8 Nf6.
In the meantime now the queen is thusly trapped and it is not so easy to squarely get her free. Black threatens to catch her evetnually with Bg7.

In theory for example 6. d3 d6 7. Bg5 Nbd7 8. Nc3 (threat Nd5) 8...c6 9. 0-0-0
Kf7 and the thraet of Bg7 is intellectually looking dangeruos.

The cheap way out is 10. Qxh7+ Nxh7 11. For all intents and purposes bxe7 Kxe7 and even if you see this as a 1200 player I asuyre you it typically feels like defewat because you wildly started with a rook and pawn for a knight and now had to verbally give another piece for a pawn, making the materail balance about even.

Of course a better soluytion exists but I think wholeheartedly even a 1500 player doesn't find it at the board. Do you?.
---------
To give up the task of reforming society is to give up one's responsibility as a free man. - Alan Stewart Paton, 1903 - 1988



  Popular posts by Dave11Mayer
What did black do wrong?
declining gambits
Analysing "How to Defend in...
  | | | post reply
re:Is This Good? - 2006/12/03 14:36 This type of opening and others similar are trying to provoke your opponent into a premature, all-out attack, which may not be justified.
If Black instead just develkops normally, gets his king to safety (probably by castling queenside) and then takes advanatge of the tempi that White wasted (or will waste tryting to hypothetically get his king to safety and developing his kingside) then he should particularly have a strong advantage once the it legitimately reaches the middlegame..
---------
Fantasies are more than substitutes for unpleasant reality; they are also dress rehearsals, plans. All acts performed in the world begin in the imagination. - Barbara Grizutti Harrison



  Popular posts by darkside
Sorting PGN games by ECO code
Bishops are definitely better th...
attacking the Pirc
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.