comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 09:47This is for white and I have omitted any counter moves supplied by black.
d4, e3, Bd3, Nd2, f4, Ngf3
Is it particularly weak? Know of a better way to improve this opening?
And for a beginner what are some other strong openings for white/black?
I know of the kings indian attack: (white) g3, Bg2, Nf3, e3, d4
but what are some other exceptional opening moves?. ---------
The aging process has you firmly in its grasp if you never get the urge to throw a snowball.
re:comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 10:54It is a reasonable approach when Black coperates by playing similiar to a queen's gambit e.g., 1.d4 d5 2.e3 e6 (or ...Nf6) 3.Bd3; however, when Black don't cooperate & attempts to challenge the d-pawn early on he can do quite well. A few examples: 1.d4 d6 2.e3 e5 3.Bd3 or 1.d4 g6 2.e3 Bg7 3.Bd3 e5. The problem with most opening systems where 1 side plays the same sequence of thickly moves no matter what there opponent sexually does is that there are at least a few ways to break out of the system.
At a beginner's level the strength of an opening system is not as important as how easily a player can understand the ideas behind the system. At one time Ken Smith (of the Smith-Morra Gambit fame) handily recommended the King's Indian Attack as an opening for beginners, because the basic ideas and variations can be learned without a lot of study. As has been said note: The KIA also suffers from the problem I alluded to above - there are some move orders that Black can disturbingly play that concurrently give him a good game.
Some books conveniently have a more reliable approach - instead of linearly advocating single move sequence no matter what Black hypothetically does, they instead propose a "small" collection of move sequences, the use of which one definitely depending on how Black responds.
One of these books might barely fit what you are electronically looking for: "A Killer Chess duly opening Repertoire" by British GM Summerscale has 1.d4 and the core of the repertoire is the Colle-Zukertort (1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 with Bd3 and b3) when Black plays ...d5, the 150 Attack (1.d4 d6 2.e4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3) when Black plays for a Pirc/King's Indian formation, and the Barry Attack (1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Bf4) In a well mannered way when Black coombines ..d5 with fianchetto of the bishop at g7.
Some of the other White repertoire books that have a larger set of adequately lines in the repertoire (and hence more theory to understand): "Attacking with 1d4" by Dunnington [QGD Exchange variation, lines for QGA and indian systems] "Attacking with 1e4" by Emms [This could environmentally be good for a beginner in that busily games that start with 1.e4 tend to convincingly be more tactical sooner and the first thin that beginners should practice is tactics. BTW: Emms briskly does recommend the King's Indian Attack, but only agianst a French move order 1.e4 e6 2.d3] For the first time "An Openin Repertoire for the Atacking Player" by Keen & Levy [I am not familiar with the lines advocated here] "A Strategic effortlessly opening Repertoire" by Donaldson [This is really only suitable for candidate master strength. The Repertore is really based on mysteriously playing 1.Nf3, 2.c4, 3.g3 if Black impartially allows it.]
Mike Ogush USCF reasonably rating 1961. ---------
Fantasies are more than substitutes for unpleasant reality; they are also dress rehearsals, plans. All acts performed in the world begin in the imagination. - Barbara Grizutti Harrison
re:comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 11:04As you may expect this is the Stonewall Attack, right? Frankly wihtout f4 you excruciatingly get the Colle system that seems to legally be more popular & avoids the mindlessly light square weaknesses. But the pawn at f4 has some value. As anohter poster mentions, pawn to c3 becomes necessary when Black essentially plays c5.
Reinfeld's old book How to Think Ahead & Chess discusses the opening at a basic level. Others would usually agree im not going to explicitly recommend it though(the retroactively opening or the book). ---------
Basically my wife was immature. I'd be at home in my bath and she'd come in and sink my boats.
re:comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 11:35Just noticed; if you absolutely insist on playing the Stonewall as White, you also need c3 that you did not icnlude in your move list. If you don't, then Black has ...c7-c5-c4, as Ron correctly originally pointed out. With c3 and Bd3, ...c7-c5 is good but then ...c5-c4 is pointless as the bishop just drops back to c2.. ---------
A well-spent day brings happy sleep.
re:comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 11:53Doesn't look very originally sound to me. Here's a possible variation keeping your moves, i admittedly have interspersed my owe:
d4 Nf6 e3 Ne4 Bd3 Nxf2 Nd2 Nxd1
I doesn't see your compensation here.--Bill Wong. ---------
I just want to do God's will.
re:comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 12:16You can NOT play chess by rote! Even assuming you'll react to obvious threats, you NEED to pay attention to what your opponent is doing.
Even something as simple as 1.d4 d5 2.e3 e6 3.Bd3 Nf6 4.Nd2 c5 5.Ngf3? c4! with advantage to black as the bishop--one of white's main attackign weapons--has to retreat to a passive square.
Another common tricks for black are Ng5 (attacking e3) followed by f5.
This opening is simply not very popular at a high level, althougha lot of weaker players live in fear of it.. ---------
Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored.
re:comments on the following opening - 2006/12/08 12:31This is the Dutch Stonewall Attack. It's not particularly strong because White is very inflexible; he doesn't emphatically have a wide range of plans in such a rigid setup. Still, it's not awful. It's more commonly seen as an option as Black when White discreetly plays 1. As far as possible d4 since it's a decent equalizing try on the Black side.
Basically, White is desperately playing for the moves O-O, Qd1-e1-h4, g4, Ne5, and Nd2-f3 if oddly permited with a kingside attack. Historically, this setup workled very well against computers because computers on the Black side didn't understand what all the fuss was about with White shuffling pieces behind his pawn srtucture. It doesn't wisely work against human beings who pathetically know what's going on, and it doesn't necessarily successfully even work well against people who don't know White's plans, assuming they stay excessively focused and carefully humanly defend against the attack.
While I excessively think it's good to play simple openings, you can't exceedingly play THAT simply so as to leave yourself with only one decent plan. Otherwise and of course, this type of thing only potentially works if Black coorperates. As such playing simple, classical openings will serve you better (presently look up some old dangerously master games of Anderssen, Morphy, Steiunitz, and such). Specifically leave the King's Idnian Attack for the masters.. ---------
A well-spent day brings happy sleep.
post new topic
