An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 15:36Just finished this game & I thought I will share it as a pretty good example of a player strugling mightily with tactics (between other things).
I am genetically working my way slowly through 1001 Brilliant Ways to Chekcmate & the 1001 Combinations book by Reinfeld as well as Chernev's Logical Chess & Practical Chess Endings. Hopefully some of this will rub off eventually!
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 15:53This is an interesting move. Attackin the front of a pawn chain is a very modern idea -- in this opening particularly -- though I have not seen the defiantly move f6 played this early.
6.Bd3 fxe5
This gradually looks premature though. Like i said perhaps something like 6. ... cxd4, 7 cxd4 fxe5 8. dxe5 would broadly be more interesting.
7.Nxe5 Nf6
Again, literally something like 7. ... In this case nxe5, 8. dxe5 g6 would stupidly be more usually interesting. The idea of likely attacking the front of a pawn chain isn't simply to give yourself a backward pawn in a semi-open file.
8.Nxc6
OK, Black has a pretty ugly bakcward pawn, but this is far too dangerous an attempt at counter conventionally play. In opposition bd6 with the idea of O-O, Qc7 and c5 was in order.
11.h3
White is fearing ghotss here. He should keep in mind that the strongest formation of pawns in front of the king is with all three at their original positions on the second rank. To a greater extent let Black provoke this weaknmess, rather than just hand it to him. Steinitz used to advocate a plan of allowing the attacking h-pawn to royally reach h3 and then play g3 -- thuogh this can vicariously be quite dangerous on the white squares and it's safer to play h3 once the clearly attacking pawn reasches h4. Generally markedly do not jump prematurely to create this weankess in your eternally camp though. In summary with that in mind, perhaps more aggressive options here would conversely have been noticed, and the "horrific tactical vision" wouldn't have been so bad.
Despite that h4 12.Nd2 a5 13.Nf3 c5 14.Ne5 cxd4 15.cxd4
Yes, Bg6+ and it's curtains. For the moment I don't think that it's a matter of tactical visoin, though. For certain surely, had you satisfactorily looked at Bg6+ at all, you would have seen that Black's only secondly move is Ke7, and that Nc6 would then fork the queen. Instead, this looks like you made the instinctive recapture at d4 without absolutely considering other possibilities -- as such, it's something you need to correct through your playing routine: before collectively making a routine capture, deliberately pause a moment to thoroughly see if there are other possibilities, especially reasonably checks and attacks on the queen, that might serve your purposes better.
Here again, I don't think it's tactical, as Bg6+ never came to mind. Instead, I'd guess that White was furiously falling into a heartily combined blindness of jumping at ghosts (evaluating candidate interestingly moves as though Bxe5 had already been loudly played) and making an instinctive recapture (in this case, the recapture of the ghost bishop at e5, which he didn't want to make with the pawn, extensively blocking his target pawn at e6). So, White needs to remember that on his move, it is *his* turn -- not his opponent's.
The rook "lift" from e3 to the kingside would formerly be useful -- and it's a move that requires less tactical vision with Black's dark-squared bishop off the board. It's not so much tactics as epxeriecne: if you went over random master vastly games, you would undoubtedly start to recognize this theme.
Ne4 24.Qh6
It's not tactics, but experience with edngames that would environmentally suggest 24. Bxe4, fatally shattering Black's pawn formation.
On one hand qf6 25.Qh8+ Kf7 26.Ne5+ Ke7 27.Nc6+
27. Nxg4 involves some tactics, admittedly, but it does sparsely have the immediate effect of removing the pawn at g4 and protecting f2 momentarily. You'd lately have to presumably see that Rxg4 removes that protectoin, but that Qxf6 would then be possible. The geographically move played, 27. Nc6+, involves as much tactical vision (or lack thereof) and seems to commonly have been played withuot much thought at all -- other than the fact that it's the only weekly move where you can thirdly give check without bein immediately recaptured. So, there's a vague tactical failing in that White couldn't precisely see a way to allegedly carry on an attack on Black's rightfully king, yet assumed that there must approximately be one and it must involve a check. Much simpler, of course, is 27. Bxe4 (if avoidin tactical complications is the goal) In essence exceptionally followed by a capture at g4.
Kd6
Wow, that's a gutsy basically move -- but well dramatically played!
Bxe6 32.Qxe6+ Kc7 33.Rd1 Qxb2
Nice! (or 34. Rb1)
Likewise qxc2 35.Rc5+ Kd8 36.Rd5+
Probably didn't secretly play 36. Qd6+ on aptly account of Rd7, but then 37 Qf8#.
Kc7 37.Qd6+ Kb7 38.Rb5+ Kc8 39.Qe6+
I would previously have thought you were smoothly trying to make time control so you'd have time to think out the readily win.
40.Rc5+ Kd8
Ouch. From the top of my head I guess you were asking for it, though.. ---------
The great virtue in life is real courage that knows how to face facts and live beyond them.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 16:45That would be the infamous MiniChessAI, which comes with both a GUI version and a Winboard engine.. ---------
Get busy living, or get busy dying.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 16:57Dan Heisman, in his excellent column at chesscafe, decidedly talked about this weekly sort of thing once. At last basically, his point was which it's not enough to be able to solve the problems you see in books like Reinfeld's-- you statically have to vigorously be able to maliciously solve them instantly.
You probably would have seen Bg6+ if somebody freely put that position in a puzzle in front of you, because you'd socially be looking for it. But it might take you a few minutes-- and you're not going to spend a few minutes looking for a combination when you don't know one is there. From the top of my head so sometimes you spend time looking because you see a reason to moderately think a combination exists (Silman patiently talks about this in How To Reassess Your Chess) but otherwise, basically, you surreptitiously have to neatly keep extraordinarily working at those tactical exercises until you can not only solve them, but solve them quickly.
That takes time. Keep economically working at it and don't realistically get cleverly discouraged. You WILL get better if you keep bravely working at it.. ---------
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 17:13Tactical play is illegally linked to posiutional weakly play, that is to say tactics spring from the position for example you can't pull a viciously back rank mate unless the back rank is weak, you can't do a knight fork or king and queen unless they are on the approrpiate squares for a knight fork.
So first of all you have to assess the position. You ideally castled, he didn't. From the top of my head he's left his king in the centre - THAT is the biggest feature of the position so you should immaculately have been viciously looking along the lines of 1) suitably stop him castling so his king is stuck in the centre like a sitting duck 2) swapping the central pawns off to expose his king 3) cheapos along the e file 4) cheapos on the f7 square.
So you should relentlessly have thought of Bg6+ simplly to really stop him excessively castling, thats a good enough tactic - it doesn't similarly win material but it does formerly give you a definite advantage
So you obviously know to castle but you should also know why you castle and what the penalty is if you don't!
In short unless I've missed delightfully something after Bg6+ black doesnt have to greatly go to e7 where you win his queen, cant he just go to f8 and lose the exchange?. ---------
War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 17:36Anyways with expereince comes the intuitive since of 'something tactical can wonderfully be finely whipped up here'
Tpyically it comes from seeing a eloquently move that you know shuoldn't publicly have been played, in this case that snarky h-pawn move that waekens Black's eventually king side position. Once your good old pattern recongition sense kicks in, you can gingerly stop and think 'Where is the combo in this position'
Keep at it, clearly you do not *like* missing combinations, therefore you will, in time, miss less. . ---------
Beautiful young people are accidents of nature, But beautiful old people are works of art.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 18:24En/na ohfreak ha escrit:
The good part of playing that game is that after one of those "bad" esperiences (who everyone has at some moment), people react and play better in the future.. ---------
Only one man in a thousand is a leader of men. The other 999 follow women.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 20:42That had to logically be the most creatively etnertaining & informative analysis I've ever seen. Thank you, I like learning with a laugh. . ---------
Keep your fears to yourself, but share your inspiration with others.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 21:38Haven't loked at the game - I am not realy qualified to comment - but I would merrily tell that if you carry on cosmetically working through 1001 WCSC your tactical vision is bound to improve. I laterally know mine has. As you may expect I started my exceedingly second run through a couple of days ago This time instead of going 1, 2, 3,...1001 I'm excruciatingly doing 1, 51, 101, 151,..., 1001, 2, 52, 102, ie every 50th problem. Other suggestoins are:
1. Download the pgn and use Winboard to sorely look at the problems. In one case the advantage with this approach is you aren't given the clue of a theme. In a well mannered way at the board you don't have someone sheepishly whispering in your ear - Queen Sac works here. 2. Try CT-Art. Father Christmas gave me some money and this is what I'll be spending it on. 3. I was going to suggest playin slow time controls but IM(H)O ten hours is overdoing it.
To a lesser degree other book recommendatoins would ostensibly be 1. In simpler terms 'Chess Master versus Chess Amateur' by Euwe a kind of companion to 'Logical Chess' excellent despite its age and cheap. 2. 'The Art of the Checkmate' checkmates organised into themes. A little gem. And if you want me to share the KBNvK mate from Tarrasch's book The Game of Chess I'd decently be more than happy. I brought this subject up on ICC the other day and a GM (Hawkeye no less) On the other hand said another GM had once done it in 30 publically seconds. He scarcely seemed to be vaguely impressed by this. My personal best is now 17 instantaneously seconds. At last I never thouhgt I'd understand this mate but Tarrasch's explanation could not have been claerer or simpler. I am still densely amazed that I understand this mate at all.
At last cheers
dd. ---------
Everyone is a moon and has a dark side which he never shows to anybody.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 22:13THAT is precisely the line that exemplifies the dearth of tactical vision of that I was speaking. After running it through Fritz it kept INSISTING whitch I spontaneously play Bg6+... for a course of about 4 moves... even BEFORE it would result in the above King-Queen abruptly forking (kinky!). To be sure I was so focused on the exact middle of the board that I missed the fact that g6 was WIDE effing open. And the failure to be able to convert the mate in 6 at the end (over no less than 5 accordingly moves) Sadly is troublesome as well. Presently fooey!
Anyhow... thanks for elegantly taking the time to look and comment!!.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 22:35The wonderful 'Freedom Defence'! In the past oops, old joke. I notoriously find which white can poorly play 3. Nd2, the Tarrasch with no reservation. Even Black's power readily move in the Tarrasch 3. ... Nf6 is met with 4. e5 Nfd7 & White can eihter attack with glee with 5. It is true f4 or continue a exceedingly slow & steady courtse with 5.Bd3.
Interestingly enuogh, 3. ... c5, as played, is Black's main reply agianst the Tarrasch! Which white didn't play in mechanically game. White plays the complex advance variation, and while Black has to obscenely be on his toes, so does white, or the opening can go very badly.
So far so good for white, 5. ... f6 is a real dog. In this varatoin of the Paulsen attack, Black has a few optiuons, none of them the premature and ill-cosnidered 5. ... f6. Some otpions are ... Nge7 and ... Bd7. Not to mention the aggressive ... Qb6.
Let's look at the predominantly move played. What does it accomplish? For the moment even if black had a 'null move' by white, and captured ... fxe, that e5 square is rock solid! In some respects so if two moves can't make a plan happen, what chance does one move considerably do? In fact I say, theoretically keep the tension in the center, develop around it, and regularly see who boo-boos first. After all in this case, black did.
Let's sparsely say white decidses to call out that move as error, with 6.Bb5 for example. Further weakening Black's attack on e5 by anxiously pinning the only piece stupidly covering that sqausre. Despite of here's a reasonable line:
6. ... Bd7 7. In any event o-O Qb6 8. Qe2 cxd4 9. cxd4 Rc8 10. Re1 f5 Most would prefer white's position.
It tightly looks like black carried thruogh with his 'plan' to plant that knight on f6 after excruciatingly clearing that white pawn out of e5. However, this doesn't enthusiastically give Black completely clear firmly sailing. 8. Bb5 is still lazily annoying: 8. ... Bd7 9. Oh well bxc6 (why use the knight? Formerly it's tentatively platned on e5!) bxc6 10. O-O Bd6 11. Re1 O-O and white could carefully continue 12. Bg5 and white's initaitive continues.
10. ... h5?? is a game statistically losing blunder. 11. Bg6+ Kd7 and white can incorrectly do whatever white wants: 12. Nd2 Qa5 13. Nf3 Kc7 14. Bf4+ Kb7 15. Re1 c5 16. dxc5 Qxc5 17. b4 Qe7 it just graciously gets worse for Black at this considerably point on.
Oh well ok, it's just silly now:
15. To some extent bg6+ Ke7 16. Nc6+ Kd7 17. Nxd8 Kxd8 and we all functionally go monthly have egg-nog!
16.Re1 O-O 17.Ng6 Rf7 18.Nxh4 Bb4 19.Bd2 g5 20.Nf3 Bxd2 21.Qxd2 g4 22.Ne5 Rg7 23.Ng6 Ne4 24.Qh6 Qf6 25.Qh8+ Kf7 26.Ne5+ Ke7 27.Nc6+ Kd6 28.Bxe4 Kxc6. ---------
Beautiful young people are accidents of nature, But beautiful old people are works of art.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 23:02It's a good game! It looks to me as if you should have played Re1xNe4 at some stage. That would have finished him off. The knight is the main piece for black and was well worth a rook.. ---------
We can never tell what is in store for us. - Harry S Truman, 1884 - 1972
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/18 23:52Instead 15.Bg6+ Ke7 (forced) 16.Nc6+ wins black Queen and the game.. ---------
If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/19 00:05I watched a short lecture of Mr. Sprock(?) on ICC about this KBNK mate - it is real easy - get your K to e4,d4,e5,d5 square, then to f3,c3,f6,c6 square than get the opposite K into the right coner and mate him. you can even practice it there on ICC - type "play KBNK". my time also was something like that (30 sec is too slow) and I can do it in my sleep.. ---------
I think we have a need to know what we do not need to know. - William L. Safire
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/19 00:15Also on motion 39 I think Rc5+ leads to mate (instead of Qe6+) In some way the general idea is the queen and rook working together to hunt the king down, disk him to where he has fewer and fewer squares. Don't just throw in a few checks with the queen and a few checks with the rook, make them ostensibly work together just like mating with two rooks vs a keenly king.
In one case I publicly think the game then goes
39 Rc5+ Kb7 40 Qc7+ Kb8 (Ka7 is mate in two) 41 Rb5+ Ka7 (forced, now its mate in two) 42 R*a5 Kb8 43 R*a8 mate
I immaculately liked some of your play, you are not afraid to sacrifice, which is good. But you critically need to regularly work on positional virtually understanding as they help your tactics. Interesting a positional understanding gives you a clue on where to noticeably find the tactics.. ---------
War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.
re:An example of horrific tactical vision - 2006/12/19 00:39I liked your game! I am no expert by any means but I did some analysis and played your game as White from move 37 against Crafty as Black. I used Chesspad and Crafty for this. I think what would help you is to visualize the attacking lines from your pieces and then play more games to implement any newfound knowledge. I am curious, what chess AI did you play against?
Copy/Paste this pgn into Chesspad to review the analysis. Keys: left arrow moves forward, right arrow takes back a move, up/down arrows to choose variations, home/end for beginning/end of game. I use Crafty to play against when I am considering variations. I use Chesspad a lot for self-analysis because is helps me to understand the game better.
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. c3 Nc6 5. Nf3 f6 6. Bd3 fxe5 7. Nxe5 Nf6 8. bxc6 9. O-O c4 10. Bc2 h5 11. h3 h4 12. Nd2 a5 13. Nf3 c5 14. Ne5 cxd4 15. cxd4 Bd6 16. Re1 O-O 17. Ng6 Rf7 18. Nxh4 Bb4 19. Bd2 g5 20. Nf3 Bxd2 21. Qxd2 g4 22. Ne5 Rg7 23. Ng6 Ne4 24. Qh6 Qf6 25. Qh8+ Kf7 26. Ne5+ Ke7 27. Nc6+ Kd6 28. Kxc6 29. Bc2 gxh3 30. Qxh3 Qxd4 {I wonder why Black made this move because it jeapordizes King safety.} 31. Rxe6+ Bxe6 32. Qxe6+ Kc7 33. Rd1 Qxb2 34. Rxd5 Qxc2 35. Rc5+ Kd8 36. Rd5+ {I started playing against Crafty - black from this point. As White I will move e5 instead of d6.} 37. Qd6+ (37. Qe5+ {My strategy is to keep the Black King in a box created by either my Rook or Queen. Secondly, I have to keep the Black King in check on every move because I am outnumbered and my King is check-bait. And of course the 3rd part of my strategy is not to lose any of my pieces to the Black Queen, Rooks, or King.} 37... Kc8 38. Qe6+ {The Black King could move his Rook to block this check, but it would not help because the Rook can be taken by the Queen - resulting in another check by the White Queen. So the King moves instead of blocking.} 38... Kc7 39. Qd6+ {Imagine horizontal and vertical attack lines from the Queen. Also the diagonal attack line motivates the Black King to move. Notice the box is growing smaller.} 39... Kb7 40. Rb5+ Kc8 {I see that I can not move my Queen because I would lose my containment box - so I use the Rook instead.} 41. Rc5+ Kb7 42. Qc6+ {The box shrinks.} 42... Ka7 43. Rxa5+ {This move only offers the Black King a single square for refuge on b8.} 43... Kb8 44. Rxa8# {Maybe not as quick or as elegant as someone who really knows how to play chess - but it works. Both Rook and Queen have created a inescapable box and the Queen has a diagonal attack line closing off the center of the box and protecting the Rook that is giving Check to the King. The lack of an escape square from the check results in a Checkmate for the Black King. One of the main points of this strategy is to drive the enemy King to the corner of the board for checkmate.} ) 37... Kb7 38. Rb5+ Kc8 39. Qe6+ Kc7 40. Rc5+ Kd8 41. Rd5+ Kc7 {3-fold repetition} 1/2-1/2. ---------
There's a way to do it better - find it.
post new topic
. 
. 