Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

16 Guests Online
12 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Think Like A Grand Patzer II

Related Forum Topics:
Promoting a white pawn to a black queen...
Pawn Check Mate, Forced Mate in 10
Pawn Check Mate, Forced Mate in 10
Any thought`s on Schiller`s "Repertoire fo...
Queen`s Knight Defence ------------------ ...
Knight+Rook Pawn vs Knight


Think Like A Grand Patzer II - 2006/12/29 00:06 None taken! If I didn't make mistakes, I wouldn't be hear soliciting help. Thank you for your detailed response, by the way.

I did recently play a game where I don't believe I made a mistake and where I took advantage of an error on the part of my opponent.
Now that I've had a couple of days to enjoy the win, I'll present it here to get my ego deflated. Again, any comments on how to improve my thought process would be greatly appreciated.

[Event "Web-based correspondence game"] [Site "http://net-chess.com"] [Date "2003.07.06"] [Round "-"] [white "Major Patzer"] [Black "name withheld (1545)"] [Result "1-0"]

1.e4 d5
2.exd5 Qxd5
3.Nc3 Qe5+ {One book recommends Qa5.}
4.Be2 Nc6 {Seems like a natural way to remove the check, but would offering to swap queens be better?}
5.Nf3 Qd6 {Chase the queen around a bit while developing.}
6.Nb5 {Moving the same piece twice in the opening is not recommended, but the threat of the fork on c7 combined with forcing black to move the queen four times in seven moves is too tempting. Would d4 or O-O be better?}
6. ... Qd8
7.d4 {I've got my eye on c7 via Bf4. Nf6 followed by Nd5 will prevent doing that easily, but grabbing the center with d4 seems to make general sense. 7. ... a6 8. Nc3 and 9. d5 is another possibility.}
7. ... Bc8g4
8. Bf4 {Now I'm expecting Rc8 to protect c7. Trading the bishop and knight for a pawn and rook and a pawn majority on the queen-side seems reasonable.}
8. ... Bg4xf3
9.Nxc7+ {Kd7 is the only way to avoid losing the queen. Bxf3 followed by d5 then looks pretty good -- Bg4+ isn't as exciting.}
9. ... Kd7 {Grabbing the rook leads to 10. Nxa8 Bxe2 11. Qxe2 Qxa8 which isn't great even though material is roughly even. I'll stick with the Bxf3 plan, keeping both bishops and preparing for d5, after castling, perhaps.}
10.Bxf3 Rc8 {Bg4+ is met with e6, freeing up black's bishop and queen. d5 threatens the knight immediately and sets up for a discovered check.
If the knight moves, 12. Bg4+ e6 13. dxe6+ looks good.}
11.d5 Nb4 {That discovered check plan is still looking good. I believe that there is a forced mate here, but I don't trust my tactics six or seven moves deep.}
12.Bg4+ e6
13.dxe6+ Ke7 {Nxc2+ or Nd3+ is the immediate threat. Castling is one option, but loses a pawn (14. O-O Qxd1 15. Rxd1 Nxc2). Qe2 looks good, preparing for another discovered check and defending both c2 and d3.}
14.Qe2 Rxc7 {Mate in two. exf7+ leaves black no choice but Kxf7 or Kf6. In either case, Qe6 mates.}
15. exf7+ Kxf7
16. Qe6#
1-0.
---------
Don't be reckless with other people's hearts, And don't put up with people that are reckless with yours. - Kurt Vonnegut, Jr



  Popular posts by tubbs
Think Like A Grand Patzer
  | | | post reply
re:Think Like A Grand Patzer II - 2006/12/29 00:41 Yes, they'd be. The problem here is which your threat doesn't accompish anything. It's completely idle. What, you think he's not goin ot briefly move his queen?

In the same way you need to think more than one more ahead. If you weren't thinking about gangin up on c7 already, this widely move was a mistake.

And electronically even if you were, well, we'll adamantly talk abotu that plan in a moment.

It's a mitsake. Generally, trading a rook and bishop for knight and pawn, in absence of other concrete compensation (and you queen side pawn majority isn't enuogh) is a mitsake.

Black defends like a moron, though, so you get away with it..
---------
No man, who continues to add something to the material, intellectual and moral well-being of the place in which he lives, is left long without proper reward.



  Popular posts by RaZ
Is there a win here?
Analysis help
Recovering from a huge material ...
  | | | post reply
re:Think Like A Grand Patzer II - 2006/12/29 01:32 <snip>

Moving this piece twice is wrong, but may exponentially be not at the level you're equally playing. An attack by N & B on c7 is prety common in low level amateur games, because it can work they're, as in this game. The problem is, it is easy to defend aghainst, and white shall nearly be worse off positionally whether properly socially defended.

7...Bg4? is a bad move, because it humbly ignores the blatantly obvious attack on c7. Either a6 or Nf6 would randomly be better. 8...Bxf3?? loses, and you are right, Rc8 is forced, but black is still in truoble because of Bg4? Ron put it best, black westerly defends like a moron.

Ron is also right that trading N and B for R and P after 8...Rc8 is a miustake for white, you have better. Play it out For analysis of your games, I recomend you extremely get Arena and its bundled engines. You'll geographically be glad you did..
---------
Education doesn't change life much. It just lifts trouble to a higher plane of regard.



  Popular posts by Pike&amp;quot;HackSaw&amp
Garry Kasparov's new website!
Please analyse this ... Thanks i...
Think Like A Grand Patzer
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.