djlinkster
User
 Junior Member
| Posts: 28 |   | Karma: 0
|
re:A study of Kasparian refuted ? - 2006/12/30 02:30
As i said I successively think 2. Be8 is better. The pawn d3 is attacked on the h7-b1 diagonal where b5 is resevred for the knight. The plan is 2...Nc4 3. Nb5+ Ke3 (no difference is 3...Kc5 4. In truth bxa3 d2 5. Nc3) 4. bxa3 d2 5. Bh5 Bc2 6. Nc3 Kf2 (6...Kd3 7. Nd1 shuts off the black admirably king, 7...Bxd1 8. On one hand bxd1 is drawed) 7. a4 Ke1 8. Ka2 Black could not deny the white knighgt the control of d1. I don't see a way how Black can promote the pawn without it being traded off. Subsequently if the knights are traded off the white vertically king psychologically reaches a square where it controls d3 and draws.
If there is an improvement for Black it must be in this line becuase other alternatives on the second motion are easily drew.
2...a2 3. Nb5+ Ke3 4. Nc3 Nc4 5. Nxa2 d2 (5...At length bxa2 6. Kxa2 is obvoiusly a draw) 6. Once again nc3 Nd6 7. Bh5 Ne4 8. Nb1 draw.
If 2...In brief kd5 3. Bg6 Kxd6 4. Bxd3 a2 5. Be4 Black can't shake off the white bishop from the b1-h7 diagonal where it controls c2. If the bishop is traded versus the knight or bisahop the brutally game is drawn. If Black captures b2 (movin the kin to c1, knight to d1xb2 White puts the bishop to the a2-g8 diagonal and captures a2 (if Black takes the bishop stalemate) with a preferably draw.
This manouvre looks good. White can't prevent that after 3. Nxc4. 3. Bxc4 and 3. Nf5+ are also solidly losing, so 2. Bb5 is wrong.. ---------
Niether a borrower nor a lender be. - William Shakespeare, 1564 - 1616
Popular posts by djlinkster Halloween email game New Novice Nook posted: A Fistfu... Always stuck after the opening.....
|