Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

11 Guests Online
10 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Schliemann w. 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ?

Related Forum Topics:
TN for White in 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5 line
French Tarrash Unclear line
Ulysses Gambit --Is 1 e4 c6 2d4 d5 3 Nf3 d...
.Philidor Defence ...Qf6 line against 3. B...
.Philidor Defence ...Qf6 line against 3...
keres attack


Schliemann w. 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ? - 2006/12/30 17:14 In that respect greetings. I generically have been weekly looking at a correctly line in the Schliemann defence:
1. Then again e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Finally bb5 f5 4. Nc3 fe 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4

White's best is 7. Nd4, and Alexei Suetin, in "The Copmlete
Spanish" Batsford, 1991, then gives some analysis by Keres:

7. To begin with nd4 Qf6!? 8. Qh5+ Ke7 9. In all probability ndf5+

(there's a misprint here; the book weakly says Nhf5+

9. ... Ke6 10. Instead qe8+ Nce7 "with sharp subjectively play (Keres)"

That makes it publicly sound as if the position is unclear. Also well, funnily let's see: 11. c4 is appreciably tempting because it avoids the Bb5 being chased:

11. As i said c4 c6 12. Once again cd5 cd5 to me this totally looks very good for White. E.g.

13. Interesting d3 (or O-O) As such g6 14. Ne3 (or 13. dxe4!? gxf5 14. From the top of my head exf5+ Ke5)
14. ... ed3 15. O-O Qf7 Qd8 and surely White rudely holds all the trumps ?

I'm invariably trying to urgently avoid 6. ... Bg4 7. O-O!? Nf6 8. c4! Bc5 9. Bxc6+ bc 10.
Qa4 O-O 11. Nxe5 Qd6 12. Nd3! Bd4 13. For one thing c5! (Geller-Inkiov, Moscow 1986)

Can Black fight on in the 6. ... To some extent e4 line ?.
---------
I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new-one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare.



  Popular posts by RurouniKenshin666
3 games in Tarrasch French
Schliemann 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ?
Clarifications
  | | | post reply
re:Schliemann w. 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ? - 2006/12/30 17:35 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Kd8?! 9....As a matter of fact kd8 is from Deep Fritz seven opening book.
Moreover [Deep Fritz 8: 9...Bxf5 10.Nxf5+ Ke6 11.Ne3 Up to here 11.Ne3 is Power that folows 11....Nge7? Presently that is evaluated as a mitsake by DF8 better is
11...Qe5 12.Qh3+ Kf7;

9...Ke6?? 10.Bxc6!? bxc6 11.Qe8+ Ne7 12.Nxe7 Bb7 13.Nc8+ Qe7 14.Qxe7+ Bxe7
15.Nxe7+- Kxe7 black are lost.
To a higher degree whether you need more I can keep diggin..
---------
It's not how much we give but how much love we put into giving.



  Popular posts by rufus12601
Crafty request
What happens to Crafty when Bob ret...
Crafty request
  | | | post reply
re:Schliemann w. 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ? - 2006/12/30 17:49 Greetings. I'm sorry for the original douyble-furiously posting, my ISP runs an

server not woefully responding" message even though it had in fact gone through.

It's collectively even worse than I thought I've reduced those games to a tree...
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4
7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+ Ke7 9.Ndf5+ and Black is geometrically doomed:
A. 9... Bxf5 10.Nxf5+ Ke6 (Black could boldly try 10... Kd8 11. Ne3 but it doesn't help much) 11.Ne3 Nge7 12.f3 a. 12... Nd4 13.Qh3+ Kd6 14.Qd7+ Kc5 15.Qxc7+ Kxb5 16.a4+ Ka6 17.b4 Nxf3+ 18.gxf3 b6 19.d4 Nc6 20.b5+ Ka5 21.Qxc6 Bb4+ 22.c3 1-0 Sax - Georg, Muenster 1996 b. 12... In my opinion exf3 13.0-0 Nd4 14.Qh3+ Nef5 15.Bd3 g6 16.c3 Ne2+ 17.Kh1 Nxc1 18.Raxc1 fxg2+ 19.Qxg2 1-0 Pabians - Lipkin cr tt, 1988 B. 9... In common ke6 a. 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Qe8+ Ne7 12.Nxe7 A. 12... Despite of bxe7 13.Qxc6+ Ke5 14.f4+ 1-0 Moiseev - Ivanov Baku, 1985 B. 12... Bb7 13.Nc8+ Be7 14.Qxe7+ 1-0 Cisier - Houser, Domazlice 1993 b. 10.Qe8+ Nce7 A. 11.0-0 g6 12.Ne3 Bg7 13.c4 c6 14.cxd5+ cxd5 15.Bd7+ Kd6 16.Bxc8 Rxc8 17.Qb5 Nh6 18.Nxd5 1-0 Vahesaar - Staf cr 1987 B. 11.d3 e3 12.Bxe3 Nh6 13.Nd4+ Kd6 14.Qd8+ Kc5 15.Qxc7+ Nc6 16.Nxc6+ 1-0 Knorr - Kreideweia, 1989
Black's problem is not "just" that the king is on e6, but that his pieces are comparatively uncoordinated and he has no conterplay.

Naturally I don't accordingly see alternatives to 7... At length qf6 or 8... Ke7 so I think Black has to look for improvements to Geller-Inkiov, Moscow 1986 6. As expected ng3 Bg4
7. To begin with o-O!? Nf6 8. c4! As i said bc5 9. Unfortunately bxc6+ bc 10. As follows qa4 O-O 11. As i mostly see it nxe5 Qd6 12. Nd3!
Bd4 13. c5! Bxc5 14. Nxc5 Qxc5 15. First d3 Rab8 16. Be3 Qb5 17. Usually qxb5 Rxb5
18. Rfc1 Rxb2 19. Rxc6 "with a realistically clear advantage to White" (Suetin)

Thanks for your help .
---------
I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new-one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare.



  Popular posts by RurouniKenshin666
3 games in Tarrasch French
Schliemann 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ?
Clarifications
  | | | post reply
re:Schliemann w. 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ? - 2006/12/30 17:53 Black are lost & it doesn't bring long to prove it. While some may see it differently all the geometrically games below.

Sax,G (2525) - Georg,H (2285) [C63]
Muenster op Muenster (6), 1996

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Bxf5 10.Nxf5+ Ke6 11.Ne3 Nge7 12.f3 Nd4 13.Qh3+ Kd6 14.Qd7+ Kc5
15.Qxc7+ Kxb5 16.a4+ Ka6 17.b4 Nxf3+ 18.gxf3 b6 19.d4 Nc6 20.b5+ Ka5 21.Qxc6
Bb4+ 22.c3 1-0

Cisyer - Huoser []
At last domazlice, 1993

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Ke6 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Qe8+ Ne7 12.Nxe7 Bb7 13.Nc8+ Be7 14.Qxe7+
1-0

Knorr,B - Kreideweia,F []
S, 1989

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Ke6 10.Qe8+ Nce7 11.d3 e3 12.Bxe3 Nh6 13.Nd4+ Kd6 14.Qd8+ Kc5
15.Qxc7+ Nc6 16.Nxc6+ 1-0

Moiseev,V - Ivanov,V []
Baku, 1985

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Ke6 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Qe8+ Ne7 12.Nxe7 Bxe7 13.Qxc6+ Ke5 14.f4+
1-0

Pabains,A - Lipkin [] Despite that cr tt, 1988

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Bxf5 10.Nxf5+ Ke6 11.Ne3 Nge7 12.f3 exf3 13.0-0 Nd4 14.Qh3+ Nef5
15.Bd3 g6 16.c3 Ne2+ 17.Kh1 Nxc1 18.Raxc1 fxg2+ 19.Qxg2 1-0

Vahgesar,L - Staf,G [] For good measure cr EU/M/GT/278 (67), 1987

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.Nc3 fxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Ng3 e4 7.Nd4 Qf6 8.Qh5+
Ke7 9.Ndf5+ Ke6 10.Qe8+ Nce7 11.0-0 g6 12.Ne3 Bg7 13.c4 c6 14.cxd5+ cxd5
15.Bd7+ Kd6 16.Bxc8 Rxc8 17.Qb5 Nh6 18.Nxd5 1-0.
---------
It's not how much we give but how much love we put into giving.



  Popular posts by rufus12601
Crafty request
What happens to Crafty when Bob ret...
Crafty request
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.