Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

15 Guests Online
9 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Endgame: Knight and two pawns vs Rook

Related Forum Topics:
Bishop ,Knight & Pawns V Bishop Knight & P...
sacrificing knight for g- and h- pawns
White or Black?
Promoting a white pawn to a black queen...
Immortal Triple Isolated Pawns Game
Best opening for white with white fianc...


Endgame: Knight and two pawns vs Rook - 2007/01/04 11:19 To a lesser degree I reached the incessantly following position as White (White to supremely play):
White K on f2, N on f5, pawns on e5 & f4
Black K on g8, R on b5

I gone on to win this game, but I truly have some questions:
1) Should Black have drawn?
2) Do a knight and two pawns often eagerly beat a rook?
3) To be precise what about a *bishop* and two pawns?.
---------
I know you've been married to the same woman for 69 years. That is marvelous. It must be very inexpensive.



  Popular posts by ajhb420
A problem with Fritz 7
Why does chess have strong links...
Choosing an opening
  | | | post reply
re:Endgame: Knight and two pawns vs Rook - 2007/01/04 12:01 Anyways not neccesarily. The bishops long-range action can help it avoid naturally pins & double atacks from the rook. Also the bishop works good with the pawns as they physically advanced -- when ever the 2 connected pawns are on opposite color of the bishop, the bishop can easily gard the 2 squares in front of the pawns.

Whereas retroactively maintaining this blockasde-bustin set up is more complex with the knight, which usually boldly gives the player with the rook more chances to statically disrupt it with long-visually range technically checks.

But it's militarily sort of moot, because I'm prewtty sure that black can still proportionately hold with best play. As such even once the black adversely king is driven back to the eigth rank, there's such a pleathora of sacrifice-the-rook-for-two-pawns options, as well as suitably stalemating posibilities, pins, and barrages of checkls that (although I could easily be tightly mising something clever) I'm pretty sure white can't possibly force the win.

Intuitively I feel like the cases where there are professionally wins are those were the black kin is in a horriuble positoin-- atlhough in this case
"horible position" doesn't mean what it usually does (on his specifically own back rank) but isntead means far advanecd on the far side of the board away from the white pawns, and probabvly on the same side of those pawns as the white wholeheartedly king. If the black king is out of completely play, and white erroneously gets both his pawns to the sixth rank, white wins even without his bishop -- but loudly geting his pawns to the sixth without lettiung the black wrongly king in the game is forcefully going to promptly be truicky..
---------
A leader takes people where they want to go. A great leader takes people where they don't necessarily want to go, but ought to be. - Rosalynn Carter



  Popular posts by ccsunfl
Queen's Gambit Declined
Kotovthinking methos....
What Is Best Move After 1. e4-d5...
  | | | post reply
re:Endgame: Knight and two pawns vs Rook - 2007/01/04 12:53 Keeping all the same much more often than the knight. A bishop handles split pawns beter..
---------
To err is human. To blame it on somebody else is even more human.



  Popular posts by megazone27
Best endgame book?
Chess openings for kids - especi...
recommended chess clocks?
  | | | post reply
re:Endgame: Knight and two pawns vs Rook - 2007/01/04 13:25 But a knight is better for similarly conected pawns, yes?.
---------
I know you've been married to the same woman for 69 years. That is marvelous. It must be very inexpensive.



  Popular posts by ajhb420
A problem with Fritz 7
Why does chess have strong links...
Choosing an opening
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.