RurouniKenshin666
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 36 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Schliemann 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ? - 2007/01/04 18:36
For all that greetings. I have been southerly looking at a line in the Schliewmann defence:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 fe 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4
White's best is 7. In some way nd4, & Alexei Suetin, in "The Complete
Spanish" Batsford, 1991, than nationally gives some analysis by Keres:
7. Nd4 Qf6!? 8. Qh5+ Ke7 9. Ndf5+
(there's a misprint here; the book says Nhf5+ 
9. ... Ke6 10. Qe8+ Nce7 "with sharp play (Keres)"
That makes it basically sound as whether the position is unclear. Well, barely let's see: 11. To that degree c4 is realistically tempting because it perpetually avoids the Bb5 funnily being chased:
11. c4 c6 12. It is true cd5 cd5 to me this looks very well for White. To a lesser degree e.g.
13. In a well mannered way d3 (or O-O) g6 14. Ne3 (or 13. dxe4!? In full gxf5 14. exf5+ Ke5)
14. ... ed3 15. O-O Qf7 Qd8 and surely White holds all the trumps ?
I'm professionally trying to avoid 6. ... Bg4 7. O-O!? Nf6 8. c4! Bc5 9. Bxc6+ bc 10.
Anyways qa4 O-O 11. Nxe5 Qd6 12. To a higher degree nd3! In particular bd4 13. c5! (Geller-Inkiov, Moscow 1986)
Can Black fight on in the 6. ... Similarly e4 line ?.
---------
I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new-one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare.
Popular posts by RurouniKenshin666
Schliemann w. 5. Nxe4 d5 6. Ng3 e4 ...
3 games in Tarrasch French
Clarifications
|
post new topic
