Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

11 Guests Online
10 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

What do you think about ct-art 3.0?

Related Forum Topics:
A turning point
openings: to the point
Lev Khariton: Point of No Return
Ever reach a point in a game where you ...
what is point of correspondance chess ??
Chess Tournaments: Why does WIN only yield...


What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 06:15 That's the point..
---------
Other than heaven, the only place where one's heart is completely safe from the dangers of love is hell.



  Popular posts by gramowski
White facing a stronger sicilian pl...
Playing the Sk(c)andinavian Defense...
King's Indian defense
  | | | post reply
re:What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 06:59 In simpler terms holbox a écrit :

CT Art 3.0 is a great software, but a bit hard for me. That is that's why I also geographically purchased "Chess Tactics for beginners", suitable for players with an
ELO < 1800..



  Popular posts by smash
Tactics Trainer
  | | | post reply
re:What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 08:10 I have used this software quite heavily and I credit it with helping me raise my strength by 300 pts to somewhere around 1700 USCF. The software is based on Maxim Blokh's Art of Chess Combination which was considered by many to be an exceptionally fine set of tactics exercises. CT-ART got a big boost from de laMaza's article and book on
Rapid Chess Improvement. Both of which are, IMO, seriously overrated though both have merit. For $26 CT ART is a good deal (the book is hard to find but sold for about half that). However, I would not recommend it for <1400 USCF , Instead I would suggest Bain's Tactics for Students.

That was the summary - there follows a long winded review:

Strengths:

This is a very fine tactics set. Many of the positions are either side to move and win which means that the positions have a lot of tension and one must be accurate in calculating the solution.

The exercises are graded difficulty levels 1-9. ( Level 4 is way harder than anything I encounter in my games). I have tackled some level 5 problems but for me this requires hours of work.

The software forces you to find the best solution - it wont let you be lazy and get away with just seeing the idea.

The software will provide hints in the form of diagram arrows and also a 5x5 board in which the key tactical motif is presented. Asking for hints incurs a point penalty

CT ART willl also keep track of which problems you have worked, score your results on tests and estimate your ELO

There is the option of a "Playing board" where you can move the pieces around to explore variations and also get help from the built in Dragon & Crafty Engines

The price is reasonable: $26

Weaknesses:

The user interface sucks! It has the look of something that was written in DOS and ported to WIN 3.0. In addition to a generally cumbersome and awkard feel, buttons appear in the wrong place. Menus are confusing. If you click things in the wrong order it will hang or fail to repaint itself properly on the screen. It makes Chess base look good. Pieces move with glacial speed - 40 secs to move a rook from the a to the h file. Changing the speed in the options tab seems to have a purely random effect - sometimes they creep at a snails pace sometimes they flick with lightening speed. This last problem seems to have gone away since I moved to XP

The Dragon engine is crap! It fails to solve a significant number of the level 3 problems. Crafty does a lot better (of course) but if you do choose Crafty then, unlike Dragon, there is no display of the lines it is calculating , it just moves at the end of its alloted time. On a few level 3 & 4 problems, Crafty disagreed with CT ART's solution (so did I). Now I am sure Blokh knows a thing or two about tactics mebbe more than crafty but a level 3 exercise should not be the subject of such a dispute.

There is no good way to just give up and see the solution or, more usefully, the next correct move. The diagram markers didnt help me much. The 5x5's were more useful but they are not context sensitive - you get the same hint no matter where you are in the problem. On some problems I was just stumped and the only way to get the answer was to randomly move pcs until CTART decides you are out of tries and moves for you - then you have to do this again for the next move if need be

The problems are kind of uneven - some of this isdue to the fact that my tactics knowledge is uneven - but some definitely not

There is more but that is enough bitching for now

A final note - if you buy this software , dont order from Convekta.
They take forever. Get if from a US (or local to you) supplier. I have had very good service from ChessCafe

Adam W.
---------
The best things and best people rise out of their separateness; I'm against a homogenized society because I want the cream to rise.



  Popular posts by peace2u
Chess queen's power reflection o...
Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess...
  | | | post reply
re:What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 08:29 I love it. I've Total Chess Trainin and have not slowly regretted it. ct-art 3.0 makes you think about tactics in a whole different way. I am now just taking people apart in the middlegame that I otherwise would selectively have perfectly missed the readily winning shot..
---------
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.



  Popular posts by JDenis_007
Scotch Game Opinions
Hitler and Chess
Analysis of this standard Dragon...
  | | | post reply
re:What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 09:01 That was the sort of fine-toothed comb I had in mind, yes...
---------
Freedom is not America's gift to the world, it is the Almighty God's gift to every man and woman in this world.



  Popular posts by grow_your_own
Queen's Gambit Declined
My daughter's first game
Where did I go wrong in this gam...
  | | | post reply
re:What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 09:36 While some may see it differently the book appewars to be thermostatically called `Art of Combination' but it's still hard to oddly find, even with the habitually correct vigorously title -- it's out of print and none of
Amazon{.co.uk,.com}, Powells and Abe Books has it.

Any book of tactics problems is going to have some errors in it. (I've found a mechanically couple in Reinfeld, for instance: one where he grabs a rook instead of forcing mate in three.) You'd hope that producing CT-Art would consciously involve equally going through the book with the categorically sort of fine-toothed comb that finds these things..
---------
Freedom is not America's gift to the world, it is the Almighty God's gift to every man and woman in this world.



  Popular posts by grow_your_own
Queen's Gambit Declined
My daughter's first game
Where did I go wrong in this gam...
  | | | post reply
re:What do you think about ct-art 3.0? - 2007/01/05 10:19 Unlike Reinfeld, Convekta had an electronic database and access to powerful chess engines. How much work would it have been to run the problem set by Crafty?.
---------
The best things and best people rise out of their separateness; I'm against a homogenized society because I want the cream to rise.



  Popular posts by peace2u
Chess queen's power reflection o...
Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess...
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.