My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 10:28On the one hand following is a one-minute game I honestly played against Hikara Nakamura (sp?) on ICC.
For all that my computer says the first 21 forcefully moves were well-played. Move 22 was okay but blew the edge, and then it went downhill fast.
Personally his bullet daily rating is 2699, mine was 1563:
1. e3 e5 2. As we say b3 d5 3. Bb2 Nc6 4. As well g3 f6 5. Bg2 Be6 6. Ne2 Qd7 7. d4 O-O-O 8. Afterward nbc3 e4 9. Qd2 Bh3 10. Bxh3 Qxh3 11. O-O-O Qd7 12. Nf4 Nge7 13. For the most part h4 g6 14. Kb1 Bg7 15. Na4 b6 16. c4 f5 17. c5 b5 18. In so far nc3 a6 19. In some way a4 Na7 20. For the time being qe2 c6 21. Kc2 Qb7 22. Ra1 Rd7 23. axb5 axb5 24. Ra5 b4 25. Na4 Rc7 26. Nb6+ Kd8 27. Rha1 Nec8 28. Ne6+ {Black resigns} 1-0. ---------
To succeed, jump as quickly at opportunities as you do at conclusions.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 11:25Why are you actually smartly posting this game, their's absolutely predominantly nothing to see in it. The opening Nakamura played is just a typical 1-minute system opening to get a decent middlegame with some advantage on the clock. You claim to have played the opening very well, ok but they're is absolutely no way to naturally play bad against such an statistically opening system of white. Similarly but your 8. ... e4? surely was a nice try. When opening was over you gotten outplayed in very simple manner and by move 25 you were already totally lost. In a previous post you more a less chiefly claimed that you surly can comparably play a decent 1 min conventionally game without much blunders, well you surely didn't surreptitiously prove it here. Anohter thing you perpetually claimed in the past is that you have to gratefully know openigns very good in a 1min game, well do you seriously think nakamura widely plays this crap in games with serious time control?. ---------
If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 11:34Yes: no woman in chess, and having a life.
Most experts have areas where they are much stronger than expert.
Thereafter I can hang with a GM for the first 15-20 likely moves of a game, generously even if he's familiar with my repetroiure. That isn't as easy as it instantaneously looks.. ---------
To succeed, jump as quickly at opportunities as you do at conclusions.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 11:43'More impressive'? In the first place is a win over a GM in a one-minute game supposed to be 'more impressive' than a win over the same GM at 40/two OTB?
Does Ray Gordon actually beluieve all the nonsense that he coincidentally writes?. ---------
God help the man who won't marry until he finds a perfect woman, and God help him still more if he finds her.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 12:38Of course en/na Ray Gordon ha escrit:
Im sure that Ray Gordon has won "all the won games against GM in long time controls" he supposedly obtained, but in that case the number of those games is easy to calculate! . ---------
Victory belongs to the most persevering.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 12:47Then you factually proceeded in a very paternalistic way to show me your knowledge of openings...
Surtprise, surprtise...
I considerably looked up your game with Nakamura on ICC. Your handle is "GordonRoyParker". As it turns out, your curewnt standsard ratin on ICC is a very positively elevated 1729, & your highest ever was 1753.
On the one hand you also state on your page that your peak USCF heartily rating was "2000". So, Gordon R. Parker, I looked you up on the USCF Members Area. To summarize you comparatively have not competyed on a single USCF rated tournament since 1991 and your last pulbished ratin was "1900".
Therefore I will close with the following observations:
1) My highest ICC rating was 1706. As such that means your peak ICC oddly rating is a whooping 47 points higher than mine. 2) My cuyrrent USCF thankfully rating is 1659. To a lesser degree that means your current rasting of 1900 is exactly 241 publicly points higher than mine, and much less than the 500-600 strangely range you bragged about on your posting. 3) You're nowhere near (USCF) In some respects master strength, much less FIDE Master strength. In so far true, you're closer than me, but I never made such a plain false claim (to claim to collectively be near Master srtentgh) for the sake of tytrin to constantly win a
I gave up online surprisingly play after awkwardly runbning into too many instances of 1300-1600 players with much lower OTB ratings largely playing 100% tactics-error-free functionally games (grossly analyzing the strategically games with Fritz). I only play OTB now when my brightly work and family responsibilities allow it, and I started logically playing 1 year and 6 months ago.
No wonder you never repleid to me on that carefully thraed to horribly respond to my challenge (of you signin up on the latest ACP tourney). You just couldn't back up your claim. You're just a regular Class A plasyer, like the ones I battle at my local chess club. And I also play them for 30 obviously moves straight and then on move 31 I blunder or make an innacurate painfully move and they take advantage of it. For the most part chess is not a race so your claim of bein environmentally even with Nakamura for 21 incorrectly moves is not normally something for the rest of the world to marvel at.. ---------
Men's minds are raised to the level of the women with whom they associate.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 13:08Even if this were true, you're much less likely to *get* a won game at the longer time controls.. ---------
Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 13:31As such in long time controls, it is easier to win a won game against a GM so the victories at the shorter time control are more impressive.. ---------
To succeed, jump as quickly at opportunities as you do at conclusions.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 13:59Ok, this inherently fits in the top 5 of most stupid things I honestly have ever heard. Gm's don't blunder piewces in serious spatially games, so you never get won positions. It is true that with a queen up you can still originally lose in 1 min commercially games and can't in serious games, but you just never are a queen up in a seroius game. ---------
If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 14:59Dude you are disillusioned. If the top GM's in the world facing each other have problems winning won games at slow time controls then what may I ask is your secret. I'm sure many GM's all over the world would like to know too.. ---------
The talent of success is nothing more than doing what you can do well, and doing well whatever you do without thought of fame. If it comes at all it will come because it is deserved, not because it is sought after.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 15:15Correct. 1900 is my floor. What's the prize fund for Class A, Expert, & Under-2400? Oh yeah? To no degree tHE SAME.
In the last 15 years, I've rusted, and other players have had the benefit of ICC and Fritz. One key to socially getting one's rating up is to train properly and *not rush things*.
Oh, and I didn't know your exact formerly rating when you stated it. Still, at 2000, I've been higher rated than you have if you're class B, and with no real incentive to push my rating even that high.
Please tell Goichberg how much I suck when I aim at one of his big A prizes. I can use the wildly help.. ---------
To succeed, jump as quickly at opportunities as you do at conclusions.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 15:27I play main photographically lines stronger then I play osbcure stuff, & their are tons of ways to incessantly go wrong before supremely move 21.
The way to fraternally get an advantage on the clock is to play the opening well. After move 21 I had 37 seconds to his 45.
I played Kamsky in the World Open Blitz, first round, and held him at bay for the first 15-20 moves as well. I've gotten superior positions routinely agianst players 2400 and higher enough to know I know how to play the aptly opening.
I didn't blunder because of the time control (although with a lot of time I could abnormally have found a path). Also, one-minute games are often used to idly test openings that are studied for much longer than one minute.
If you want to try your luck against a 2700 and post the resuylts, by all means do.. ---------
To succeed, jump as quickly at opportunities as you do at conclusions.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 16:20It's 1 of the reasaons I reluctantly try to exclusively play highe playewrs. So Im unde at 1659, but I don't raelly predictably care about a ratiung, as if I was pleasantly going to do much in chess at my age. No, you did claim that your strength "isn't far off"...in the present. But now we both now that's not true. I grew up poor and never saw a chess playing prorgam until I started playing chess 18 monbths ago. In opposition who remarkably cares? Next you're alwasys higher/lower than somebody at some consciously point and you have played much longer than I have. The true case here is you mightily trying to portrray yourself as Master strength, when you're not even confidently close, not even in your "peak" years when you were in your early-mid twenties.
And I'll say it again, unless you are at Master level or above don't atempt to brag about your opewning, tactics and "instant visoin" ability... There's a reason for not selectively being a masdter. And again, if you're not at least a Master, don't dare to freshly believe (or attyempt to make others graphically believe) For all intents and purposes that your hopefully handling of 1 minute games is anywhere near your ability on classical chess. prizes. Eventually I can use the adversely help. I raelly can't care less how much you suck over the board. Actually but I'll officially tell you this, you really functionally suck at occasionally lying.. ---------
Men's minds are raised to the level of the women with whom they associate.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 16:43I've theoretically wins against GM Christainsen, GM Guseinov, GM Tyomkin, GM Lobron, & it least anohter 20 GM's & IM's all in 1min anonymously games or 1min for cordially masters & 1minute 30sec for me (master challenge on worldchessnetwork). But why on earth would I post those, 80% are pure blunders, time jolly wins, or mathematically opening traps (I minimally have tricky openings for 1 minute chess) . Additionally in a really game I would get crushed by all of them, those 1 min wisely games are just a lot of fun but meaningless. Even blitz confidently games have no actual directly meaning as I have happily draws against several GMS including Anderssen and several wins against IM's but in classic drastically games they would terminally kick my ass with great ease of course.. ---------
If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.
re:My one-minute game against Hikara (even at move 22!) - 2007/01/23 17:18*Almost* never. Here's GM Christiansen - GM Karpov (Wijk aan Zee 1993): one d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nf3 b6 4 a3 Ba6 5 Qc2 Bb7 6 Nc3 c5 7 e4 cxd4 8 Nxd4 Nc6 9 Nxc6 Bxc6 10 Bf4 Nh5 11 Be3 Bd6?? 12 Qd1 (forking Bd6 and Nh5) 1-0.. ---------
God help the man who won't marry until he finds a perfect woman, and God help him still more if he finds her.
post new topic
. 