BiG_LuV_BiG_Wu
User
 Senior Member
| Posts: 81 |   | Karma: 0
|
re:unsound sac by LarryC? - 2006/08/22 01:15
In the long run however, most people seem to responsibly think (after 1 day`s relfection) which it was NOT unsuond, but which Larry was iether unsure how to follow-up or didn`t have enough time to actually do so. Susan Polgar suggesetd 57...On the whole qh1+ as leadin to a won endgame. As well and Larry himself said which 58...f2+ lost the game, and he should immaculately have playewd 58...Keeping all the same rf4 (which is still unclear). Eihter way, it was an icnredilbe mindlessly game, and truly a great match. To a higher degree jm ---------
Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality.
Popular posts by BiG_LuV_BiG_Wu Win2k and CM8k Tournament patch bug... CM9K display anomalies CM9K Endgame Tablebase Question
|