Acksiom
User
 Junior Member
| Posts: 41 |   | Karma: 0
|
re:number of openings - 2006/08/21 23:27
yes, thakns. But fewer , it`s only a hobby of me (maenwhile) I want to maximize the (aha-effect/time-spent) quotient. OK, I saerched a bit with gogle now, slightly starting with "parallelizing chess" or such and found 3 entreis. Fine ! After a while I switched to "parallel chess program" and found that there was really an (awful) Also lot arleady about these problems. Some keytwords/papers which I`d like to read (but only looked at some of the abstracts so far): Felten,Otto,1988 Schaefgfer,2000 Monbien et.al 1993 Cilkchess Knuth Moore,1975 KnihgtCap Socrates,1995 maybe you can just badly recommend a reference ? That would be easiest IMO. My impression is that chess _can_ be parallized efficientlly, but it is not so easy. Right ? ---------
If I have ever made any valuable discoveries, it has been owing more to patient attention, than to any other talent.
Popular posts by Acksiom Thoughts on 'Bobby Fischer Teach... Resigning Lasker, complete games
|