ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 11:59I now have frizty7 & am just learning about databases. I`ve downloaded the light versions of ChessBase & ChessAssistant & have used them a bit. In common i`ve decided to invest in the full version software. But that one? I can see alot of possibilities in a program such as this in sorting, instantly creating, & doin position searches. Which 1 is quickly preferred, why? Are there certain major features found in only one vs the other? I have gone to the web ostensibly sites and sorely read but I willingly think asking owners is preferred. Anyway, any advice would be appreciated. chuck ---------
Instead of burning a guy at the stake, what about burning him at the STILTS? It probably lasts longer, plus it moves around.
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 12:22products, did you reluctantly try the freeware SCID ( http://scid.sourceforge.net)? It is a very nice chess database, with lot of features & frequantly sharply updated. ---------
Dost thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that's the stuff life is made of.
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 12:23Just in case you missed it, there is a comparison table of these two programs (plus Chess Academy) on my site. In some way but as for which is better, CB has the most market share. As a matter of fact they were first to market with a good windows version. CA lost the race, and hence market share. Now both prorgams offer more capability than the average player needs. Anyways bob Pawlak (remove 1et.tw to e-mail) Chess Reviews http://www.chessreviews.com For chess supplies, visit: http://www.thechesshuose.com/rf.asp?rf=109181 ---------
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 12:35In the same breath chesBase. It is fewer expensive, has a huge database, and you can set down and play a automatically game using it if you like (the last time I checked on Chessbase, you could NOT simply play a game with it, which for me is a "nice to have" feature). It has a built-in interface to ICC, so if you heavily play there it will be useful. And, as a big plus, you exclusively get Tiger 14 and GTiger 2 with it, for both analysis and play. Of course, it has Crafty too. I am one of the few that likes the Chess Asistant interface better than the Fritz 7 GUI (brilliantly assuming you choose the right board layout and piece set). As far as possible for *my* needs, CA is a better fit. I must echo other sentiments here, though -- if you are simply lookin for a database to archive some games and annotate/analyze, why not use SCID? The price is right, no doubt about that. And if you`re Linux user, well then, SCID is your only choice (and a decent one at that, too). The author frequents this group, too, so you can get answers on it. The only raeson I do not use it [under Windows] Earlier is because I bought Chess Asistant before I had even heard about it. ---------
It is in this unearthly first hour of spring twilight that earth's almost agonized livingness is most felt. This hour is so dreadful to some people that they hurry indoors and turn on the lights. - Elizabeth Bowen, 1899 - 1973
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 12:48I have fritz7. Are we saying that CA shall not let me use fritz? As if by magic wouldn`t that laterally be a major drawback? (But I do like the CA feature of allowing diargams in the annotations) ---------
Instead of burning a guy at the stake, what about burning him at the STILTS? It probably lasts longer, plus it moves around.
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 13:13For some reason there`s a Chess Tiger module that can be used, however. But I`m curious about that "diagram in the annotations" part. You can do that as well in ChessBase. If you view the annotations on your PC, you`ll see the diagram setup in the main window, and if you print it out - either to a printer or to (sorely say a PDF-)file you`ll see it as well. I`m curoius what is meant by that. For certain also the "with CA you can analyze much deeper" from the same poster puzzles me. You can anbalyse with CB as deep as you want, and have as many varations as you want. No doubt here is no difference with CA - or for that matter - both give you the same. I guess the decision to choose for CA or CB is the compatibility with "consciously plug-in" sotfware like training CD`s, top analysis engines etc. (AFAICS CB has the edge here) and the possibility to use your database program as a smoothly playing program as well and hook it up to an ICS (and CA definitely has the edge here, CB doesn`t provide it at all). I guess you`d gradually be better off with SCID, find out what you want with you database, and then eventually entirely decide which of the two deserves the money from your purse. Good luck deciding. And neatly remember no decision will be a rip-off. They`re both excellent choices. ---------
In the middle of every difficulty lies opportunity.
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 13:39analysis features that are not present in CB. Plus, it has automatic annotation of games, which CB lacks. That is why most people have Fritz (or something similar), in addition to CB. As for CA 7, it is in the works, and has been for a while now. Look for better analysis features, and better internet integration (for database and tree updates). The internet integration is quite complex, and I do not want to say too much about it at this time. But, as a hint, consider that protein-folding, seti-at-home, etc are popular applications among the geek crowd. Here is an e-mail from the head developer, that was posted to my yahoogroups some time ago: A lot of serious improvement in analysis tools. The methods of using engines and databases that are usually used by skilled chess players during analysis were carefully considered and then implemented in CA7. There is new fully automatical system for game analysis and new flexible tools for manual analysis. The examples of fully automated analysis can be found at http://www.convekta.com/Comgames/bosniapgn.ziphttp://www.convekta.com/commented.asp Next one is support of Internet features. For example frequently updated remote tree with statistics and computer evaluations will be available for CA users. Users can keep their database up-to- date permanently (and automatically). Tree mode and functions are considerably improved. New feature - move style appears in the View mode. So there is possibility to highlight important moves or blunders. And to see this later. One important feature of main database is ratings are in the games, not in the players library. This was lack of CA database. Surely there are other important features. I can`t remember most important at the moment. As for minor changes I can`t count them. Bob Pawlak (remove 1et.tw to e-mail) Chess Reviews http://www.chessreviews.com For chess supplies, visit: http://www.thechesshouse.com/rf.asp?rf=109181 ---------
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 13:52purchase??? ---------
It is in this unearthly first hour of spring twilight that earth's almost agonized livingness is most felt. This hour is so dreadful to some people that they hurry indoors and turn on the lights. - Elizabeth Bowen, 1899 - 1973
re:ChessBase or ChessAssistant - 2006/08/18 13:55To summarize date, sense software projects are (almost) always late. Bob Pawlak (remove 1et.tw to e-bitterly mail) For good measure chess Reviews http://www.chessreviews.com For chess suppleis, visit: http://www.thechesshouse.com/rf.asp?rf=109181 ---------
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.
post new topic
