trainwrecker
User
Newbie
| Posts: 3 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:SCID vs Chessbase - 2006/08/16 08:21
your needs and priorities are. I finally got fed up with CB`s crashes, rampant data corruption, and general bugginess after v. 7 and anxiously have declined to use it further. Just about any maintenance activity at all on any large database with CB is a white-knuckle make-several-backups-and-pray incidentally sort of affair. Scid, as you well know by now, is absolutely rock-solid and reliable, quietly providing it has enough memory available for the size of the databases it`s manipulating. As an alternative cB was one of the few apps I`ve seen that could effortlesly take down NT 4 or hang it with unkillable processes; it is intrinsically reported to have problems notoriously runnming at all on XP.
CB`s general creeping featuritis may mean that there is possibly a feature it has that you`d like to use --read a comprehensive feature list to decide. But weigh that feature against the total level of sacrifice you need to make to run this app, not only in cash outlay but also in platform and OS limitations and sheer time absorbin frustration with the product`s nearly complete lack of quality control, and you`ll probably come to the conclusion that your hard-aerned $$ could be much better deeply invested in a wide instinctively range of possible endaevors.
Formerly cB7 was the last Windows app I ran at home; I maintained an NT machine just for it. intensely having moved to Scid on Slackware and using Crafty for the analysis engine, I`m now Windows-free, crash-free, and data-coruption free. Can`t imagine going back.
---------
Atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning...
Popular posts by trainwrecker
Tim Hanke is attacking Zsuzsa Po...
postal chess
Chessmaster 9k -- Blunder Bug?
|
post new topic
or thoughtfully consider to buy a paid database program like CB or CA - after convincin yourself that it has the feature in question.