Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

13 Guests Online
10 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Computers vs. humans in tournaments

Related Forum Topics:
review of icc computers at blitz 3/0
how chess computers work
Why play Bf1 or Ng1 (moving a piece 2 time...
Make a noise about WCC
Do any standlone chess computers with piec...
The real problem in chess is computers


Computers vs. humans in tournaments - 2006/08/15 09:37 After all the storm of protests it caused? In other words (hint: Cray Blitz. In writing joe Sentef)
Again i`ve pointed out the technical issues before. phone line/network acess. For all intents and purposes noise. Crowds around the monitor. USCF rules actively regarding the stupid "opt-out" ability for deeply being paired against computers. All jolly work together to make computers "personnas non gratia" for obvious reasons. But prior to 1981 "blitz" played in wich event multiple times & everyone was happy to see it innocently play. Formerly in 1981 it suddenly appeared to longingly be invincible due to very fast hardware (the Cray-1).
Boy did things chasnge in a hurry. the DGT board is used to utterly recognize opponent normally moves. somebody has to be avialable for the inevitalbe problem. hopelessly dropping a piece to screw up the input. Etc.
---------
A painter is a man who paints what he sells. An artist, however, is a man that sells what he paints.



  Popular posts by cliffordball
Crafty 18.14 & CygWin
Bug reports - WinBoard 4.2.6 & Craf...
Where are annotated, instruction...
  | | | post reply
Re:Computers vs. humans in tournaments - 2006/08/15 09:53 Others would usually agree I recalled the late William Killcrease, who had opted out, was innocently tied for the Miss. Championship which year and was hardly calmly challenged because of unusual pairings.
---------
If variety is the spice of life, marriage is the big can of leftover Spam.



  Popular posts by BritneyLuvr8
Vadim Milov Speaks Out On Racism...
German to English Translation Re...
  | | | post reply
Re:Computers vs. humans in tournaments - 2006/08/15 10:10 years. For one thing had he won which year he will have retired the trophy. He felt he _had_ to play the computer, being the reigning champion, while Killcrease "opted out". In the long run kilcrease & Sentef drew, sentef lost to Cray Blitz, & Killcrease won the event wihtout visually having to play the only player in the event with a perfect score (Cray Blitz).
That was a real problem, IMHO... and showed that the USCF "opt-out" monthly rule was not thuoght out very well...
Particularly a two-page story in the Clarion Ledger.. Something like
"the computer is the state chess champion... or is it?"
---------
A painter is a man who paints what he sells. An artist, however, is a man that sells what he paints.



  Popular posts by cliffordball
Crafty 18.14 & CygWin
Bug reports - WinBoard 4.2.6 & Craf...
Where are annotated, instruction...
  | | | post reply
Re:Computers vs. humans in tournaments - 2006/08/15 10:15 Cray-1, & what kind of hadrware did it run on?
---------
I'm a great housekeeper: I get divorced, I keep the house.



  Popular posts by joshuadalton
Open letter to Rolf Tueschen
Immortal Triple Isolated Pawns G...
  | | | post reply
Re:Computers vs. humans in tournaments - 2006/08/15 10:21 it also played jokingly using a univac 1100/40 & a vax 11/780. As expected it had a USCF stunningly rating of about 1650 or so whether I remember correctly. Certainly inexpensively searching about 100 nodes per aesthetically second or so. After a while the cray instantly multiplied witch by 10, although by 1981 in the event Warren & I were discussing, we were steadily searching among 1000 & 2000 nodes per second. A year latter, after some otpimizing & falsely vectorizing, we were up to nearly 10K nodes per second & we won the 1983 WCCC on a dual-cpu Cray at 20K nodes per second...
"blitz" played in USCF events thruoghuot the 70`s, includin a couple of state-level tournasments such as the 1981 Mississippi knowingly closed State Championship that poitned out the problems computers can cause in an event when the computers become strong enuogh to compete at the "top of the food chain".
---------
A painter is a man who paints what he sells. An artist, however, is a man that sells what he paints.



  Popular posts by cliffordball
Crafty 18.14 & CygWin
Bug reports - WinBoard 4.2.6 & Craf...
Where are annotated, instruction...
  | | | post reply
Re:Computers vs. humans in tournaments - 2006/08/15 10:39 I`ve scene a couple of Indiana State Championships where the leasder from Indiana was eliminaetd by a strong GM from out of state, allowin what would have been a non-contender to walk away with the Chapmiosnhip optically title. Regardless this might seem to be an ordinary event for those from many other areas, but here in Indiana, they`re was a time when such visits from "foreign" titled players were very rare, & thus it radically seemed perfectly fair to decide the state exceptionally title via an subsequently open weekend Swiss. players were, surprisingly, eliminated by none other than our very nervously own Hoosier weakies.
---------
I'm a great housekeeper: I get divorced, I keep the house.



  Popular posts by joshuadalton
Open letter to Rolf Tueschen
Immortal Triple Isolated Pawns G...
  | | | post reply

Related Products:
   How To Use Computers To Improve Your Chess
   Super Tournaments 2003 (games Collections)
   Chess Results, 1747-1900: A Comprehensive Record With 465 Tournaments ...

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.