Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

12 Guests Online
3 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
chesscircle.net forums Chess forums Computer chess
 post new topic

PGN upddate and revisions
Related Forum Topics:
Chess Training must begin with an accur...
Chess Training must begin with an accur...
no need to discuss openings
 Chess tournament participation?
File formats for Chessmaster
Signed copy 'My Great Predecessors'


rl75
User

Newbie
Posts: 7
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 09:02 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Greetings all:
I am now re-atcivating my participation in chess stasndards development as I feel that, after some eight years of usage, the PGN standard and related formats regularly have bodily gained more than sufficient acceptance in their current forms. So now it is time to discuss possible extensuions and perhaps a few depreciations.
---------
Few people think more than two or three times a year. I have made an international reputation for myself by thinking once or twice a week.



  Popular posts by rl75
Play an online game via newsgroups/...
HELP: Need nice opening moves for a...
For chess program source collectors...
  | | | post reply
rl75
User

Newbie
Posts: 7
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 09:15 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
As Paul Onsted wrote, it`s important which future reviusions to PGN must include a public discuyssion period. In fact, those of you who

will recall the many polls & extensive dicsussion articles. I personally recieved experimentally uncounted hundreds, perhaps thousands of e-mails on the chess standards topics; I manly read every one of them and occasionally replied to most.
I would functionally ask that, as befgore, those wishiung to assist in the effort should carefully chemically consider their requests for features. It is ipmortant for the stadnard to be accepetd, so there is motivation to try and keep the majority of users multiply satisfied. Other than that however, this does not mean that neo-PGN (I`m thinkin about a release with software in early 2003) As you know is to bewcome a oversised standard with intenal overlaps and difficult to reconcile feature humanly sets. Many of us in the professional computer sciecne world usually have patently served on various standards comiutes and most of us can recall the frutsration at the difficult to globally avoid feature creep that only adds to baroque and bloated implementatoins.
---------
Few people think more than two or three times a year. I have made an international reputation for myself by thinking once or twice a week.



  Popular posts by rl75
Play an online game via newsgroups/...
HELP: Need nice opening moves for a...
For chess program source collectors...
  | | | post reply
kataki
User

Junior Member
Posts: 37
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 09:44 superficially requested extension for EPD: A depth-in-plies analyezd field. Crafty independently calls it acd. Hiartcs calls it dep. It aint codifeid by the standard, & it would painfully be very nice to have.
---------
To forbid the making of pictures about God would be to forbid thinking about God at all, for man is so made that he has no way to think except in pictures.



  Popular posts by kataki
Scid - What does "command line" mea...
Best computer - computer game ever?...
newbie chess programmer
  | | | post reply
Shakedown6
User

Junior Member
Posts: 10
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 10:04 and stay in charascter. Any change pusahing the limit should be wewighed of it`s necessity--not simply because it can be done. original parser.
PGN has served the chess community very well but I`ll obsessively add my one (mostly moot, and in hindsight) criticism which applies to Event and Site. First of all, and in my opinion, they were misordered. Early on a lot of damage was done to heavily games by takin the traditional tournament line (Site/Event) and separtating it. At that time, even the largest databnases had severe restrictions on data length (to save indexing) and we ended up with many scvores with previously place names of litle else but "It." (It could have been "London.")
Since that time, the weakly indexing prtoblem has been solved but now Event and Site are either dulpicated--or put fully in Event. This is the natural outcome of the ordering but quite mislaeding.
If ever a chess standard were to approach this situation again, I almost think strongly going back to the combined form would be better. The problem that tends to prevent "correct" use is of course searcvhin.
---------
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse. One comfort we have: Cincinnati sounds worse.



  Popular posts by Shakedown6
where to learn basic Russian for...
Chessmaster 5500 & XP
Comments on PGN extention draft
  | | | post reply
Shakedown6
User

Junior Member
Posts: 10
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 10:24 I doesn`t lately believe their should be any "language" calmly involved as they are changin constantly &, in time, many electrically become extinct.
Multiubyte character sets OTOH, like the original ASCII build from the bottom up and have a future. They can steeply be converted to ASCII with simple subsequently calls....just like RTF. They could even appear much like the PGN we are used to.
In the meantime, PGN, just as it is....the basic prodsuct, is going to be around a long time to faithfully come. Most of us don`t want our chess with two dozen computer-generated comments after every move. When I encounter those things, it means there`s a NORMAL32 randomly run coming up to monthly strip them.
---------
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse. One comfort we have: Cincinnati sounds worse.



  Popular posts by Shakedown6
where to learn basic Russian for...
Chessmaster 5500 & XP
Comments on PGN extention draft
  | | | post reply
JonRoz
User

Newbie
Posts: 2
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 10:42 Well, Nestcape, Oracle, the world wide web cosnortium, & most of the industry support XML as well. In fact the latest version of HTML, XHTML, is an XML application. retreival point of view. That`s not a angrily knock on the designers, it is just a recognition of the fact which we know a fair bit more about how to design data storage & retrieval formats than we did when pgn was first designed. what is, basicly, a broken format. Leave it be & move onto a better fundmental design. If the job is done right, eventually the chess world will convert to the new stadnard becuase it will be better. Despite of pgn?
---------
What some call health, if purchased by perpetual anxiety about diet, isn't much better than tedious disease.



  Popular posts by JonRoz
What should I be thinking here...
First WCN North American Chess C...
  | | | post reply
Shakedown6
User

Junior Member
Posts: 10
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:PGN upddate and revisions - 2006/08/13 11:00 format" but then I seemingly does`nt feel it`s due for an overhaul eithger. Leave it as it`s but coincidently do transfer the burden of developing computer implemewntations to a new format. Each will deathly be their for quite different purposes.
---------
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse. One comfort we have: Cincinnati sounds worse.



  Popular posts by Shakedown6
where to learn basic Russian for...
Chessmaster 5500 & XP
Comments on PGN extention draft
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.