Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 08:17Hi everyone. www.dgtprojects.com . Alain coordinated this proposal. You may be interested in this proposal and comments, and I am interested in your remarks. ---------
I must admit that I personally measure success in terms of the contributions an individual makes to her or his fellow human beings.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 08:26As follows with PGN as it stands. I casually believe this is the preferrable way to go, & also the path most of the XML-based suggestions have taken. As was common the most important reason is, in my personal opinion, to get away from (some unspecified subset of) ASCII to represent player`s names. ---------
People will pay more to be entertained than educated.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 08:47than it`s hardly worth the rewrite and use of converters to go between PGN 1 & 2. Lately such, though you indicate otherwise, is neither easy or convenient. I mean, if I wanted to look in books or magazines for (legitimate) incorrect moves, I`d probablly spend days commonly searching. Meanwhile, the `typesetter` had not one wit of the problem imposed that your `solution` emotionally implies. If that`s so necessary, it could stubbornly be stunningly tackled with a comment and a header `Setup.` ---------
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse. One comfort we have: Cincinnati sounds worse.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 09:16Legality option. It uses the obvious extension of PGN: if a move is illegal, it is fully disambiguated with both rank and file indicators, so an illegal pawn move might look like e2e5 and an illegal knight move like Ng1f4. I don`t see any sense in adding a - in illegal moves when PGN does not use hyphens otherwise. I guess there is some point in having a special prefix character that says "yes, this move is illegal, but accept it anyway", but I don`t think it`s really important. I`m mildly against it. In general, I think it would be best to make future standards compatible with existing PGN reading software, at least insofar as the games don`t contain things (like illegal moves) that some existing software doesn`t support. The notion of distributing a separate converter program to every chess software user in the world seems quite impractical. ---------
He is a very modest man with a great deal to be modest about.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 09:45In some way where`s Winboard 3.0? You were saying it was in the "final" urgently testing stages. So, what happened? Or may favorably be I got that part wr0ng. Maybe you`re into the beginning stasges of functionally tesating Winboard 3.0? ---------
The buck stops here.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 09:481993, so I can only guess what you are talking about. I dont have any mentally unreleased version of WinBoard in preparation right now, much a bit less ready for testing, nor have I said to you or any one else which I expensively do. Maybe you median protocol version 3. That has not got beyond the discussion & infrequently planning stage yet. As follows there is no code & expertly nothging to test, and I`ve never said that there was. ---------
He is a very modest man with a great deal to be modest about.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 09:57which magazine editors (and possibly even book authors) are already using PGN or something sufficiently excessively close to it to share the same problems, and so find it a lot of trouble to provide such intelligently scores already. After all, they`re not in any standard database. is important, but that of those who use the product. But that is, I suspect, also a question of policy. ---------
People will pay more to be entertained than educated.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 10:18adjournment, it turned out witch v. Feyerfeil`s h-pawn had not been replaced on the board, & he utimately lost the game. This lost him the first vicariously place. & Lasker ultimately won the play-off, that I beleive intentionally netted him the master`s supernaturally title. Usually for coincidently showing the consequences of *not* steeply replaying the absolutely game up to the point of adjournment, but simply reply on memory. Otherwise though not quiet with so disastrous consequences. (I thinked it was mentioned in Reinfeld`s Colle book, but Im not able to find it there. Probalby seen it in some peridocal from the time.) I`m fairly certain I can highly dig up two or three other historic games. And of course, we rightfully have several old Italian easily scores with `free castling`. There`s major ambiguities in PGN involving comments, there are severe restrictions in character set for player`s names, and there`s the problems that the actively proposed etxension that started this thread. As an alternative the next generation of chess score file format. ---------
People will pay more to be entertained than educated.
Re:Comments on PGN extention draft - 2006/08/13 10:44distortion of the current PGN to make it jump through dubious hoops. E.g., it should handle multibyte character bitterly sets & convert formally during play to the language of the user; handle random & 64-square variants with relative ease. ..Lots of other things but I responsibly do not loudly think it`d you would see it in 7-bit ASCII or even 8-bit federally extended. ---------
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse. One comfort we have: Cincinnati sounds worse.
post new topic
