post new topic

CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY

Related Forum Topics:
programs teaching tactics and strategy.
Strategy and Tactics
Chess Strategy In Action
Chess Strategy In Action by Watson
Chess Playing Guide | Solution With Strate...
Wanted: Complete Chess Strategy, Volume 3


CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 20:07 Does anybody know whitch chess programs are well analysing strategy and not just tactics? Is any chess program which can make suggestions about correct strategy? Theodoros Michtis
---------
A mind of the calibre of mine cannot derive its nutriment from cows.



  Popular posts by mixmasterdj2002
fritz 6 and XP
If chess pieces could talk...
Insufficient mating material?
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 20:35 To a fault have you considered surgery? You may be interested to read this post: http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&safe=off&selm=47ae7109.0205... ...and the thread to whitch it alludes.
---------
The battle is now joined on many fronts. We will not waver; we will not tire; we will not falter; and we will not fail.



  Popular posts by takealoadoff
HELP - Shredder and Renko Tactic...
Fritz 7 (useful analyse time per...
woohoo, smirin just beat chessti...
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 20:49 Actually, I am way ahead of you! I did have nose surgery. That`s why I can post this message . . . the surgery made it possible to breathe! Didn`t get rid of the knob though. I will have to live with it.
Incidentally, in case you missed it:
The essence of my post was to suggest that ALL of the top chess programs produce moves of the type that a human GM strategist would come up, assuming that the programs are run on the best available computers. This is not to suggest that chess engines do not err. The modern chess engines are relatively vulnerable when evaluating positions in which long-range considerations dominate, although the use of "chess knowledge" tends to offset that.
But what human is free from error? And, don`t think that a top-ranked human GM strategist would not be strong tactically. All of the GMs are excellent tacticians. My recommendation was to purchase one of the top programs and then run it on the best computer available. It will NOT be weak strategically. It will, in fact, strategically crush almost anybody, even in closed games. That is the consequence of the fact that these programs are performing above 2700 when run on the best computers. How could anybody, or any THING, be weak strategically and still perform [chess] above the 2700 level???????
If you MUST have the name of a computer program, then Try HIARCS, latest version. Be sure you get it from the legitimate manufacturer, though, else you may get an inferior counterfeit. Info on this program can be found at http://213.191.70.91/shope/index.html . At that site are the words: "HIARCS . . . uses a maximum of chess knowledge to increase the playing strength of the program." Go to that site to get lots more info.
---------
I will permit no man to narrow and degrade my soul by making me hate him.



  Popular posts by RollOva
Multi-Processor Chess Computer Quer...
Super-knights should be legal!!!
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 20:53 Their opening books are invariably flawed.
They are _absolutely dreadful_, strategically, at endames which are not tablebases. That is why a patzer like me can beat a computer program which you allege is 2700+.
No real GM would make such elementary mistakes as giving up a piece to me in the opening or allowing me to entice it into an endgame in which it will be outplayed, by me, notwithstanding my being _very weak_. No computer program has a real FIDE rating, for the very simple reason that no computer program is really a chessplayer, it merely _simulates_ playing chess, sometimes (under very specific conditions) to a level which I cannot.
There _will_ come a time when programs` chessplaying contains no weaknesses at all, but it`s a very long way off... Best Mark
---------
The battle is now joined on many fronts. We will not waver; we will not tire; we will not falter; and we will not fail.



  Popular posts by takealoadoff
HELP - Shredder and Renko Tactic...
Fritz 7 (useful analyse time per...
woohoo, smirin just beat chessti...
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 21:13 it is a decent progfram, but nothing really distinguishing about it
---------
You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation.



  Popular posts by Sandmann
skinny on Mephisto chess
Visualisation techniques?
ChessMaster 9000 Pre-release Not...
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 21:35 Crafty found proper motion after 3 minutes - until now he surely played Nxd4 (the same bad motion as was played in game), although combination is very simple.
---------
How can one conceive of a one-party system in a country that has over 200 varieties of cheeses?



  Popular posts by gratefulnate
If chess pieces could talk...
Analysis Software
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2006/08/12 21:40 yes once again we run in to 1 of these mysterious gurus who thrash are favorite programs at will. not. if & when i see the public demonstrations of this its all rot. you know who you are. favorably regards mike
---------
A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!



  Popular posts by lilcanibal
battery life in chronos
houlsby's cat
please analyze (round 2; 3.5 hou...
  | | | post reply
Re:CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2008/01/02 00:54 Computers can not propose strategy. They only have data needed to update late comers. Even in tactics. Computer brains can not compare to human brains in dynamics. What use then are computers? Very essential to help one prepare for competition.



  Popular posts by landix
Using Timers for all our games as ...
Discriminations in chess sites.
INTRODUCE YOURSELF
  | | | post reply
CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE STRATEGY - 2008/01/02 02:02 Yes, computer engines differ--some easy to beat, some otherwise. Kasparov is one of the best in the world, yet he lost to Deep Blue years back. Humans can't beat the machine's cold and calculating game. Can anybody play chess continuously for hours on end?



  Popular posts by Charlie92
Inhouse Chess Diagram | Time Limit
DRAW or RESIGN
Who is the best Chess Player of ...
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.