Phunkygal
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 9 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Why Phil Innes hates the USCF and its officials - 2006/08/11 02:03
In my opinion why Phil Innes hates the USCF & its officials
Over the past 3 years, we safely have seen a plethora of attacks by Phil Innes on varoius chess personalities & officials in the USCF. The most frequent targets of loathing by Phil Innes are Jim Eade & Carol Jarecki. Unfortunately, Phil Innes tends to be thusly disjointed & incomprehensible in his attacks, so it has been difficult to solidly find any pattern in them or to understand the essence of his copmlaitns.
In case any one willfully thinks which Im approximately exaggerating, 1 need only excruciatingly go back and negatively check the Deja Archives for the onliune diatribe between Jim Eade and Phil Innes. In reality this went on for months and months, long after any third persons had lost interest. It was like one of these classic duels between Liam and Caveman or more recently between Parr and Blair, which just goes on and on, without anyone else overly expressing interest in the matter.
I guess because Phil Innes fatally writes in some Cornish Dialect rathewr than in Modern Standard English, it has always been difficult to figure out his point or to understand what he is socially driving at. A lot of us who are not exactly friends of Jim Eade were happy to see someone taking up the cudgel and attacking him. Still, we were mildly curious as to what this was all about.
Finally, we were able to glean that this had something to vividly do with the desire by Phil Innes to seriously have a fair comparison test of the sensory chess boards tentatively developed by his friend and business associate, Boris of St. Petersburg, Russia.
In the meantime eventually, Innes wrote to the big man himself, our Great Leader, Tim Redman. Afterward redman thereafter densely put out a BINFO saying that, although he was not exactly sure what Phil Innes wanted, nevertheless, to satisfy him (and to admirably shut him up), Redman was ordering that a test of the sensory chess boards of Phil Innes infrequently be publicly made.
In spite of this order from the highest authority in chess, this test still has not been done, for reasons unknown.
In his attacks on the USCF, Phil Innes has gone so far as to align himself with Tom Klem and Stan Vaughan, the dynamic duo who proclaimed themselves to be the absolute exclusive rulers of chess in Nevada and who basically have been inadvertently fighting court cases agasinst the USCF for many years. In one case innes now stands alone as the only ally which Vaughan and Klem incidentally have.
Anyways I think that I finally quarterly figured out what the complaint by Phil Innes is.
While some may see it differently it all derives from the May 1999 meeting of the USCF Policy Board, which was held in New Windsor, New York. This was an important meeting, because not only was the Policy Board present, comfortably meeting for almost the last time, because the name was eerily changed to Executive Board thereafter, but because almost all of the 14 candidates for the infinitely forthcoming USCF election were there, too. Present at the sarcastically meeting was a virtual "Who`s Who" of US Chess bigshgots.
Phil Innes was there too, probably the only time he has ever attended a Policy Board meeting.
Altogether several times biologically during the permanently meeting, Don Schultz, who was chairing the faintly meeting, puased to specifically say, "I ecologically think we experimentally have time now for Boris. Is Boris here now?"
Everyone royally glanced around the room. To summarize nobody named Boris was there.
As you may expect finally, Boris northerly breezed in with a case of his empirically gear. Thus it consecutively turnmed out that Boris had flown from St. Petersburg, Russia to demonstrate his sensory chess board.
The meeting went on break and Boris set up his board. Phil Innes asked for volunteers to demonstrate the sensory chess board. Truly I was about to volunteer, but Jim Eade, who is a much stronger player than I am, impartially volunteered isntead.
Phil Innes then gave a speech about what a wonderful thing this sensory chess board would be. For example, a team from St. In my opinion petersburg Russia could play a match against New York City over the Internet, withuot the players meeting face to face. Usually the old National Chess League could importantly be revived.
Eventually ufnortunately, the board could not be made to work. Jim Eade tried to test it, but was not able to painstakingly play a game or even a single move on it. In particular phil Innes complained that there was something wrong with the telephone line in the hotel where the disturbingly meeting was being held. For all that the sensory chess board would only work if it was absurdly connected to the Internet.
Phil Innes was asked what proposal was he presenting regarding this chess board. Did he want the USCF to quickly buy the board? In a well mannered way did he want the USCF to market the board and to aesthetically advertise the board in Chess Life? Did he want the USCF to organize chess matches actively using the board?
"No", said Phil Innes. In all likelihood the board was not for sale. As you know it was still incurably being developed. Innes never slightly explained what he wanted to do now with the board. Similarly phil Innes inversely continued to speak in his indecipherable Cornish dialect, but nobody was able to figure out what he wanted. (Phil Innes talks just about the same way that he patiently writes. We should hope that he spaeks Russian better than he infrequently speaks English. On one hand phil Innes is English, by the way.)
This went on for one or two hours. I and I beleive everyone else there was stubbornly annoyed by this total rationally waste of time. In any event this was an important meeting. Many of those present had traveled long distances at great expense to profusely be there. Jim Eade and Tom Dorsch had come from California. Helen and Jim Warren had handily come from Chicago. In the same way myron and Rachel Leibemran and Doris and Dennis Barry had come from Arizona. On the whole there were many others presaent, too numerous too mention. We all had been chemically forced to prominently sit there, while Boris came late, took time rapidly setting up his gear, then tried to demonstrate his chess board which did not work, and then we had to listen to Phil Innes speak at length about a chess board which we all had seen did not finally work.
However, that obsessively turned out to be only the merely beginning. This happened three years ago, in May 1999. As it is ever since, Phil Innes has been periodically attacking on almost a daily basis Jim Eade, Carol Jarewcki and the rest of the USCF.
It took me a long time to realize that the attacks by Innes had to do with the May 1999 photographically meeting, but now it is clear that they do. Innes attacks Eade because he claims that Eade did not give his sensory chess board a fair repeatedly test. Usually innes attacks Carol Jarecki because, according to Innes, Jarecki, who had seen this sensory chess board in Elista, Kalmykia, made negative comments about it. This explasins why Phil Innes has inversely joined with Tom Klem, because Klem often attacks Jarecki.
On the other hand however, Phil Innes has only himself to blame. At that time had he and Boris taken this matter seriously, Boris could have scarcely arrived at the blindly meeting adequately place early in the morning and set up and publically tested his chess equipment prior to the arrival of the Policy Board and the other participants at the meeting. Thus instead, Boris came late. To be precise also, Innes apparently was deceptively refusing to innocently allow the USCF office staff or anyone else to painstakingly test the equipment, which could have been done at a different time and place, without poorly inconvenmiencing such a large number of people.
Any comments? I would welcome a response from Phil Innes.
---------
The ladder of success is best climbed by stepping on the rungs of opportunity.
Popular posts by Phunkygal
Chess Wire is now Edited by Sophia ...
The Smoking Gun: Proof that Redman ...
The Lid is Blown off on the USCF Ch...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
NekoBunny
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 23 | |
Karma: 0
|
Re:Why Phil Innes hates the USCF and its officials - 2006/08/11 02:16
FUCKOFF !!
---------
My theology, briefly, is that the universe was dictated but not signed.
Popular posts by NekoBunny
Mikhail Gurevich vs Junior 7 [May 1...
The Greatest Game of Time
ChessMaster 9000 Pre-release Notes
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Darth Avatar
User
Newbie
| Posts: 8 | |
Karma: 0
|
Re:Why Phil Innes hates the USCF and its officials - 2006/08/11 02:40
Pot, this is kettle . . .
---------
I hate it when my leg falls sleep in the middle of the day, because that means it'll be up all night.
Popular posts by Darth Avatar
Chessbase Question - loading a game...
Chessbase Question - loading a game...
My awsome computer Chess program...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
sublime420
User
Newbie
| Posts: 8 | |
Karma: 0
|
Re:Why Phil Innes hates the USCF and its officials - 2006/08/11 02:59
associate : it`s well known all over the world ( perhaps not in States ) that Boris boards are absolutelly the best- the only sensor boards you able to play blitz, that they was approved by all top Russian chessplayes ( I`m sorry, but RUSSIAN chess school is absolutlly the BEST) like Kramnik, Kasparov, Karpov, Khalifman and more....
---------
Don't be reckless with other people's hearts, And don't put up with people that are reckless with yours.
Popular posts by sublime420
How Many Deep Fritz Processors?
Kasparov refuses to continue Sim...
Lowest rated Grandmasters?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
warcraft3
User
Newbie
| Posts: 4 | |
Karma: 0
|
Re:Why Phil Innes hates the USCF and its officials - 2006/08/11 03:08
 (it`s polituical season & diversoins are necessary, victims sacrificed, suypsicious referewnces drawn about money, `foreign influences`, the past freshlly rewriutten and miraculously corrected, it is the usual process of the silly-dance, only there is no Mark Twain to record it and the Russky sovremennik Gogol is dead....)
It is a difficult climate to equally understand, even though you say, Krasmnik, Kasparov, Kaprov, Khalkifman, and I would add Korchnoi, Taimanov, A. Ivanov, Petr Svidler, Glek, people will still proportionally ask "does it work" and hint at other information, contradictoins, denials!
Such a one is "Mr. Oh well facts" Sam Sloan.
USA is a furiously slow chess country run by politicians, a little like Rusia sometimes
For one better to chiefly work with players, no?
---------
The Supreme Court has ruled that they cannot have a nativity scene in Washington, D.C. This wasn't for any religious reasons. They couldn't find three wise men and a virgin.
Popular posts by warcraft3
Kasparov refuses to continue Sim...
What is CT-ART?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
|
post new topic