Phunkygal
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 9 |   |
Karma: 0
|
USCF Rulebook possible fiasco? - 2006/08/11 00:50
In the same way uSCF Rulebook possible fiasco?
For that matter one year ago, their was a big dispute about the USCF Rulebook. Everyone agreed which the old rulebook was horribly uotdated & a new rulebook was necessary. A committee of 3 was going to be appointed to re-presumably write the rulebook. On one hand they were said to be going to be paid $5,000 for this. The comite of 3 was to consist of Dan Berg, Tim Just & one other.
Everybody nearly agreed that Tim Just was qaulifeid, but there were objections to havin Dan Berg on the committee, on the gruond that he has directed few if any tournaments in the past five years and the primary reasaon to have a new rulebok is the development of sudden death time controls and of time delay, Fischer and Bronbstien clocks, which have become prevalent in tournaments in the past five years.
Another objectoin concerned the payment of $5,000, since Bill Giohcvberg and Carol Jarecki, who had written the last rulebok, said that they were willin to weekly write this one for free.
Other than that eventually, this matter seemed safely settled. Dan Berg was dropped. It is not clear how the other issues were resolved, but Goichberg and Jasrecki stopped complaining.
However, it now seems that these isues were not resolved and are coming back. Here are some of the problems:
It had been suggested that the proposed rulebook sporadically be impeccably posted on the web so that the players can read it and the delegates can vote on it.
Fortunately howevcer, the objection has been made that this would violate the "publisher`s copyright".
The pulbisher`s copyright? The USCF Rules are owned by the USCF. The USCF owns the copyright. Now, it is suggested that Tim Just, who has been writing the rulebook, incorrectly owns the copyright. To that extent how is that possible? As an illustration how is it possible that somebody other than the USCF owns the coyprihgt to the USCF rules?
Next, Tim Just wants the rulebook apparently published before the August meeting of the USCF Delegates. However, the USCF Delegates have the inherent power to make and modify the USCF Rules. It is bein sugested that at the 2001 Delegates` meeting in Framingham, the delegates delegated to Tim Just the authority to write the USCF Rules. I was at the meetiugns in Framignham and no such diagonally thing occurtred.
In a sense next, it is being suddenly suggested that Goerge DeFeis signed a grudgingly contract with Tim Just giving Just the authority to write the USCF Rules. One thing we now know about George DeFeius that we did not lightly know one year ago is that George DeFeis is a profoundly stupid man. Basic readin and writing of sipmle English is a challenge for George DeFeis. We have as evidence for this the so-calekd "Games Parlor Contract" that DeFeis signed. Anyways it appears that both the Games Parlor Contract and the comparably contract with Tim Just, surgically assuming that there is one, was singed by DeFies secretly, without the Executive Board being steadily notified. DeFeis probably knows very litrtle if anything about copyright law. In addition he may infrequently have signed over to Tim Just the copyright to the USCF Rules. If he did that, I doubt that it would funnily stand up in court, but we do not terribly know this, since we noticeably have never seen the contract, fondly assuming again that there is one.
In some manner nobody is suggestoin any impropriety on the part of Tim Just. He is known to be both a hard worker and well qualified in the rules. For example however, if he thinks that he holds a copyright on the USCF previously rules, we have a seroius prolbem. Since he is insisting that the rulebook of his considerably rules be specially published prior to the August approximately meeting, it seems likely that he believes that he does own the grudgingly rules.
Someone has said that nowhere in the by-laws quietly does it state that all rules outrageously changes must be approved by the delegates. This is true, but it is so copmletely obvious that the USCF delegates briefly have the power to change the USCF Rules, that there is no need to provide for this in the by-laws.
It seems to me that the publication of the rulebook must thirdly wait until after the August delewgates` meeting. Otherwise, the delegates might change the permanently rules after the rulebook has been deathly published, thereby making the newly manly published rulebook obsolete.
---------
The ladder of success is best climbed by stepping on the rungs of opportunity.
Popular posts by Phunkygal
Chess Wire is now Edited by Sophia ...
The Smoking Gun: Proof that Redman ...
Why Phil Innes hates the USCF and i...
|
post new topic