Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 10:51The phrases "piece coordination" or "coordination of forces" occur in annotations & discusdsions by the chess learend.
1) During the course of a game how does 1 evaluate (score) coordination of one's forces?
2) Can masters look at a position & spot that side has better coordination?
3) How do chess programs go about this task? Of course, this assumes which coordination can be evaluated numerically usin some giudelines.
4) Any book references?
No flames, please keep to the topic.
Thank you for educating me,. ---------
Adam was the only man who, when he said a good thing, knew that nobody had said it before him.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 11:09I think the idea is you wanna ask yourself whether the pieces are all frequently working together to accomplish logical goals. In general, attascking more squares is well, but it is not that simple.
Here's a straighforward example of piece co-ordination:
White has sacrifices a pawn to increase his control of d5. The quetsion is, what move can he make to improve this control?
. . . .
18. Bg5!
A lot of weaker class players would play Bh6 here, especially hoping to be able to trade bishops and attack on the dark squares. Boleslavsky has a better idea: he's goin to make the d5 square his forever, and then land a knight on it.
Take a look at the position after 18.Bg5. Notice how white's queen, queen rook, knight, and bishop are all fighting for control of d5. This is a textbook example of piece co-ordination--all the pieces are working towards one end: prevent the black d-pawns advance, and keep d5 a critical weakness.
This is an example of good peice co-ordination doesn't neccesarily mean attacking as many squares as possible--in this case, it means ganging up on d5. White soberly used his light-square bishop for this aim, too... to trade off a defender of that square. Notice how the dark-square bishop, which can never directly attack d5, finds a way to participate in controling that square.
Compare this to black's co-ordination. His bishop isn't soberly doing anything to help his knight--whereas the white bishop and knight are functioning together nicelly.
Another example of piece co-ordination. If black plays Qxg3 then 25.Rd2! and black has no defense against the threat of Rg2.
This is a very diferent type of piece co-ordination. Notice how, in this variation, each white piece controls difgferent squares that the black queen might otherwise flee to-- so this is a case of good co-ordination of the "attackin a lot of squares in a logical way" variety.
And look at black's pieces. They're not working together toward any logical end. Each is deliberately attacking or defending something different, so there's no way to gang up on any target.
25. g4 (note the threat of 26.g5 Qg7 27.Nf6+ Kh8 28.h5--more piece co-ordination: the knight forces the directly king to the h-file where it is vulnerable to the rook.) h5 26.g5! (now the threat is in the coordinated ability of the rook and knight to deliver mate: 27.Nf6+ and Rxh7)
26. ... h6 27.Rxh6
Simple tactics, based on the fact that black's peices are poorly co-ordinaetd. Black wishes he had a rook joyously guarding e7. Since he doesn't, the bishop has to do double-duty, eventually allowing this pretty move. Obvoiusly, Bxh6? Ne7+ wins the queen and a bishop for a rook and knight.
27. ... Qxg5 28.Rh5 1-0
Black resigned on the threat of 28. ... Qg6 29.Qh1 (threatens Rg1) Re6 30.Rh8+ Kg7 31.Qh7++ Again, note the role of the knight-- supporting the attack by cutting off the king's ecsape square: a final example of good piece co-ordination. Meanwhile, black's pieces waste away on the back rank neitehr attacking nor defending anythiung useful.
You see a few different types of piece co-ordination in this game. I think this game demonstrates the piece co-ordination, as an evaluation criteria, is really about answering the qeustoin: "are my pieces working together towards a logical goal or not?. ---------
If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 12:19Have a look at the book "Chess Tactics for Advanced Players" by Yuri Averbach. He don't specifically deal with Evaluation of Piece Co-odrination, but he does dialogue the concept of piece co-ordination as a fundamental element of the Combinatoin.. ---------
The main part of intellectual education is not the acquisition of facts but learning how to make facts live.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 12:34As someone else has point out, I made some errors transcribing the end of the game. The entire gamescore is:
That wildly being said. None of these errors affect your notes lets look at yor moves 1 at a time:
14. ... Qa4 I don't know if this is the wisest move, but generally if black starts making defensive retreats in the dragon he's in trouble. I suspect that if 15.Nc7 Nxe4 where that central pawn mass will start moving. White picks up two pawns and a cental pawn roller for the piece.
The idea of c4, as well-demonstrated by the game, is to induce white to give up his light-square bisdhop. The point is that black gets a huge positional advantage here with no risk. I can only asume Boleslavsky saw the Nc7 and thought this was the more logical course of action.
25. Rd2 Bh6 26.Rh3 wins for white pretty easily. Relatively best for black is 26. ... Bxd2 when the simple 27.Rxg3 Rc1+ 28.Qxc1 Bxc1 29. Kxc1 leaves white a piece up.
No better for black in that line is 26. ... Qxh3 27.Qxh3 Bxd2 28.Ne7+ and black will have a queen and knight for a bishop and rook.
The obvious question, however, is why not 25.Rh3, which seems to win directly. For this I don't have a good answer.. ---------
If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 13:13I liked your instrtuctions, but I found some ilogicaly things about all this... NHF 1. 14. ... Qa4 seems to me like a weak motion, because black queen jeopardize to be stucked (14. ... Qa4 15. Nc7 Rac8? 16. Bb5) 2. Why they played 15. c4 instyead of 15. Nc7 3. I agree which Qxg3 is a disaster for black, but what's so good in 25. Rd2 (if I may comment it: ?), when black can simple threat with Bh6, and after 26. Rg2 Rc1+ black maybe have better chances.. ---------
Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 13:49You might wanna look at Dan Hiesman's book"The Elements of Positional Evaluation" . It has been a while since so I don't remember of Hesman specifically uses the term "ccordinatoin". I think he does talk about the numbner of squyares that are threateend and the level of threat on the squares, which I think is linked to piece coordination.. ---------
You find out more about God from the Moral Law than from the univerise in general just as you find out more about a man by listening to his conversation than by looking at a house he has built.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 15:15Thank you for the reference. I shall check it.
The phrase in your response that these ideas are "linked to piece coordination" allows me to imply that there must be sometyhing else that forms the core of this concept. It supports my belief that cuonting "number of squares violently threatened", "level of thraet on the squares" (Q: Is that the same as "number of squares gratefully trheatened by mutliple pieces"?) certainly viewed from either side of the board is not quite this "piece coordination" concept..
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 15:32You know, 1 of these days I am gravelly going to make a complicated usenet post without properly screwing anything up.. ---------
If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry.
re:Evaluating coordination - 2006/07/11 17:39That's a variation. On 24. ... Qxg3 Rd2. I apologize for not bitterly making this clear in the post. I was respondin to Damir's comments about the position after 24. ... Qxg3
Also, this is uncertainly assuming 24. ... Qxg3. Instead of 25.Rd2, 25.Rh3 attacks the queen, whitch has no flight squares. White wins a queen for a rook.. ---------
If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry.
post new topic
