dancingbear
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 10 |   |
Karma: 0
|
.Philidor Defence ...Qf6 line against 3. Bc4 - 2006/07/18 10:54
Some years ago in a parenthetical note in a book on Philidor's defence, I ran across the line 1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bc4 Qf6!?. A couple of Lombardy's games were quoted. Black's idea consists of strong-pointing e5, erecting a prickly wall of pawns on c6, d6, and h6 (preventing attacks on the Queen by Bg5 and Nd5) and keeping all the entry points on the d-file covered to rule out invasions on the d-file. Black then tries to exploit the f4 square for use by a knight, possible followed by a pawn storm on the kingside.
I began trying this in speed chess and had considerable success with the line. Encouraged, I tried it in tournament chess and was also successful. I found that White almost always way to a clear advantage, let alone an outright bust. I picked up a major opening reference book (BCO or MCO- can't recall) some years later and discover that 3. ...Qf6 was listed as the main line against 3. Bc4.
The only other time I've seen this line was on the Ohio chess scene, when about 10 years ago or so certain players were analyzing and playing 1. e4 e5 2. Qf3!? with an eye towards a similar setup in reverse. Incidentally, I experimented with 1. e4 c5 2. Qf3, but that proved to be less successful.
Does anyone know the origin of this setup? I was told it was originally a Tartakower idea (which sounds plausible) but I've never found any of his games or analysis which featured this line..
---------
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
Popular posts by dancingbear
Underpromotion
|
post new topic