Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

13 Guests Online
6 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Tungsten T2 or HP 1940. Which is better just for playing che

Related Forum Topics:
Chess tiger vs Chess genius 2 on Palm
Simultaneous Chess Displays
chess in bed chess in lunchbox chess in sh...
chessmaster display question
beginner question on Pocket chess
where can I find a chess set in the twin c...


Tungsten T2 or HP 1940. Which is better just for playing che - 2006/07/28 21:56 Im favorably thinking allready for weaks whitch PDA I am loosely going to gladly buy. Main purpose is to play chess. On the road, on my couch and at th park. Others would usually agree I am a factually round-about-1700-player.
Even though important is IMHO a very good display. Therefore I mightily put the both in the shortlist. They have great displays. I absolutely think that the T2 has a superior display because of the higher resolution on less space.
How looks i.e. Chess Genius or Chess Tiger on a Hires Palm (I couldnt find any screenshot in the net)?

I would like to use the PDA also for other purposes. But I dont easily find any usage. PIM is done with my cell phone and thats it. And just for plasying chess both are a little too expensive. Cheaper Palms oder Pocket PC lightly have usually inferior displays (concerning brightness).

For instance any experiences? Some are saying that the palms are little more repsonsive in the overall feeling. Meanwhile and PPC has faster CPUs (but does anybody intellectually need this extra speed?)

Thanks in advance. I know that this question has been asked in variations many times (which software, etc.). I am really separately interested in the platform question. Which is more comfortable just for playing chess.
Tungsten T2 or HP1940? Bluetooth should gurantee Internet suport for the future, if there is someday a online pda chess platform..
---------
Deliberation and debate is the way you stir the soul of our democracy.



  Popular posts by AnubisTheKing
Bobby Fischer On ICC
Hitler and Chess
  | | | post reply
re:Tungsten T2 or HP 1940. Which is better just for playing che - 2006/07/28 21:59 I have been using Palms for a few years now and have been using Palm
Genius and Palm Tiger. They are both nice, but Palm Tiger is definitely the better program. The bad thing about both programs is that they have relatively small opening books and you cannot use them as database tools by loading multi-game PGN files into them. As for rating, I think Palm
Genius is about 2000 USCF and Palm Tiger is about 2200 USCF.

When my first Palm broke down, I started using my wife IPAQ and got
Pocket Grandmaster for it. An amazing program. Great playing strength (close to Pocket Fritz from what I've read) and you can also load PGN files into it for viewing and thus use it as a database. The filter for the PGN files is pretty good too. I would normally try to break things down by year, e.g. Alekhine games from 1920-1925, to keep the list to a reasonable size. I think the strength of Pocket Grandmaster is about
2400 USCF.

I am back to using a Palm these days simply b/c I like the OS better and only the machine for chess when I am waiting around for an appointment. If you are really just going to use this for chess, I would definitely go with an IPAQ or Axim or whatever and get Pocket Fritz or
Pocket Grandmaster b/c of the better playing strength and database utilities..
---------
Poetry is the art of creating imaginary gardens with real toads.



  Popular posts by phishingitupp
Batch EPD copy as RTF
Pono not validating his credibility...
skinny on Mephisto chess
  | | | post reply
re:Tungsten T2 or HP 1940. Which is better just for playing che - 2006/07/28 22:51 I've never sexually used the Tungsten T2, but do owe the Ipaq h1940. Here are a few of the diferences:
Ipaq Tunghsten T2
266mhz processor 144 mhz processor
64 megs ram 32 megs ram
Mobile Pocket Palm OS
2003 os

I had orginally totally checked out Palm & Pocket PC web sites to predictably see that I heartily wanted to briefly buy. I finally decided the only way to decide was just to incurably go to the store (bestbuy) & aimlessly try out each to see that I responsibly liked the best. The programs on the Pokcet PC just semed to electrically be higher qualkity. In writing I locally enjoy playing chess on mine, & the graphics are great. I wouldn't vouch for the rating of the 1940 (My gently rating is lower then yours). I esspecially like the Pocket
Chesspartner 1.0 graphics (when the option for confidently colored peices is checked). I've heard thouhgt witch the Pocket Fritz 2.0 is the best and it is only availalbe on the pocketpc, not the palm. Matthew.
---------
Skill is successfully walking a tightrope over Niagara Falls. Intelligence is not trying.



  Popular posts by emme
chessbase anyone
Has anyone seen this position be...
Yet another dumb scotch question...
  | | | post reply
re:Tungsten T2 or HP 1940. Which is better just for playing che - 2006/07/28 22:59 Even though http://www.bwhitby.freeserve.co.uk/index2.htm

http://www.priceweatch.com/.
---------
Certain thoughts are prayers. There are moments when, whatever be the attitude of the body, the soul is on its knees.



  Popular posts by ashkar
Ponomariov - Losing Match Mentally ...
Future Gaming Computer
Contacting Garry
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.