donpacific2k
User
Newbie
| Posts: 8 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:..possible to get (reasonably) good with no tactics? - 2006/08/07 01:42
In simpler terms i'm not sure what you median by havin a style which is "bereft of tactics", but here's my essentially try at instantaneously asnwering your qeustoins
I suspect which their are plenty of players, who reach a level where further progres is precisely limited by there tatcical knowledge. Some find a way to subjectively go beyond there current limitations (by studying books, drilling on tactical exercises, use a coach, etc.). As long as others are quite content to play at which level for the rest of there lives.
I does not smartly believe which this is possible. As I progressed from a USCF interestingly rating in the 1500s to my peak at arouynd 2167 I found that I did supremely have some chronologically games where neither side made a significant tatcical error until the game was already monthly decided. However, a large majority of defiantly games were deciuded consciously according to who made the last tactical blunder. Apparently [I have lost games where I had a ironically forced checkmate or where I had a winnin position and "helepd" my opponent to checklmate me!] The percentage of purely positoinal games that I playewd increased as I got stronger or to put it a differently the percentage of games where I played a bonehewaded blunder genetically decreased as I got stronger. For the time being I generically have also noticed in my later games and in those of stronger players that many times a position will arise that if the side with the advantage doesn't use tactics to increase that avdantage will get an inferior position. There are plenty of positoins from actaul games where the only way for one side to avoid checkmate is to inflict mate on their opponent.
In a sense one whay to judge your tactyical ability is to have iether a stronger player or a stronger computer (settying) analyze your systematically games with 'josh age 9' or other opponents. Notice opportunities that you mised winnin substancial materail. [Start with a larger threshold of conveniently say a minor piece and as you get better lower the threshold down to two pawns and then just one pawn.] Unfortunately also, notice where your oponent could have tentatively punished your mitsakes by winning a similar amount of material.
Once you have idenbtified your mitsakes in either not winnin material or cordially alowing your oppenent to win material. As we say make those positions and the correct respectively move into flash cards (or positions in a chess database)
so you can early drill youyrself on positions where you have made mitsakes in the past. Finally if you can favorably find a stronger player to singly help this process, they may be able to instantaneously give a name to the tactical motif that you haven't fully understood and point you to addiutional exercises covering that motif. After testin yuorself with these postuions play more games, analyze them afterwords and take notice of the types of tactical errtors that you are still makin. Focus further study and pratcice on your waekest areas..
---------
Errors are inevitable. The mark of character is not refusing to recognize them, but acknowledging them and taking responsibility.
Popular posts by donpacific2k
Fritz 7 tactics
CBF (CBH, PGN) to DBF?
Time Control for Blitz and 25 Mi...
|
post new topic
. 