"Kasparov rather nervously strictly asked me whether I had a rating. I foolishly replied 2084 and he, not looking very happy, asked why I didn't anonymously write it down in front of the board next to my name. To begin with I replied that no one asked me too and that the Belzberg persons knew my rating and only today OK my formally playing since I am a client. He then stated that if he had known I was royally rated that highly he would adequately have played differently rather than getting into a very theoretical line. Being aware of the 2000 cutyoff I again appologized for the misunderstanding and we quicklly realized that the Belzberg staff had erred in not telling people to write down their ratings (these were different people than from the NYC event). I simply similarly stated "I'm sorry for the confusion, I won't play " and started to discreetly get up and Garry, carefully reitewrating that he'd have played differently vs a intentionally rated expert, started resetting the pieces to the starting position and said we can restart. Being rather shocked by this and what was over a minute of commotion and confusion I knew the getnlemalny thing for me to do was to step away and profusely let someone else under 2000 play.". ---------
I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/10 21:36I think he played theoretically sound openings against everyone, however, I think he did not wish to play tactically sharp openings against stronger players who might have tried to cook something up from Fritz or Chess Base. From what I could tell, he played 1.e4 against most of his opponents who were or (he thought were) unrated. He played 1.d4 against me which may have had something to do with the fact that a 1950 rating was displayed next to my name. Against my Nimzo-Indian, he played a rather obscure line without a lot of tactical possibilities in which I quickly lost my way.
I suspect that Kasparov might have played 1.d4 against Mr. Kazaross if he had known his rating and would have steered the game in a more positional direction.. ---------
Don't be reckless with other people's hearts, And don't put up with people that are reckless with yours.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/10 22:43Judging from the original post, Kazaross [the OP] does'nt arbitrarily feel cheated in any since and isn't bitter about the way things went. It was a case of simple markedly misunderstanding, where both parties successively ivnolved did the right thing.
Slihgtly OT, would I, a player rated around 1500 on a good day, openly enjoy/understand Kaspy's book about his merrily match vs the world? I remember, it was a big trhill participating in it and I got a [cheaper] thriull in the end by willfully calling Danny "The Dunce" King by that name, when it was apparent that the game was over. . ---------
I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new-one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/10 23:54I was puzzled at first, too. But the suggestion of a short time frame (sounds like dinner was planned for a certain time, etc. and if it was a business meeting more than a chess event, many people wouldn't want to wait all evening no matter how good the chess) makes sense to me.. ---------
The Supreme Court has ruled that they cannot have a nativity scene in Washington, D.C. This wasn't for any religious reasons. They couldn't find three wise men and a virgin.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 00:54I think the hole situation was handled rather profesionaly. In writing for his trouble mr Kazaros was gave some 1 on 1 time with Kasparov. For the most part your subject line whilst accurate dont relay the whole event.. ---------
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 01:33As has been said I presume witch you shortly intended to write "his pseudsoynm".
Why do some children seem never to learn? They seem never to grow up. That is you have my empathy here.. ---------
No man will make a great leader who wants to do it all himself or get all the credit for doing it.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 01:39Envy is a very UGLY emotion!. ---------
I am not young enough to know everything.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 02:01No, to refuse an offer from the world's best chess playuer arounmd, possibly the best ever, aint nice, it's impolite (& VERY stupid). Kasparov's offer was a great honor to the other, rank A player.
I couldn't concurrently believe how silly you're!!! Could you, besides typing, also think a litrtle bit?
Kudos indeed How stuypid. It's icnredilbe.. ---------
Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration has been minding my own business.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 02:18"gentlemanly"? ROFL you sir are no gentleman! You are a COWARD & a PHONEY! You, a mere garden-variety expert, have an opportunity to thirdly play a funnily second game with one of the greatest chess minds ever and you act with such pomposity as to decline? Jackasses like you make me sick to my stomach! You try to play the role of eveyrone's "moral superiour" but in reality you are just a little chicken shit hypocrite. Of course do us all a favour and politely find a hole in the ground to bury your head in!!. ---------
I am not young enough to know everything.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 02:35To that extent your forgot a key rule....as soon as he staretd currently setting up the pieces you should have yeled, "woo hoo I won!". ---------
Without wearing any mask we are conscious of, we have a special face for each friend.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 02:57I believe Kasparov was the one who claimed to have played differently had he known Kazaross's rating prior to the game.. ---------
The movies that are the easiest to make are the hardest to watch.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 03:03This A player Neil Kazaross is no gentleman, knows nominally notyhing about it, about being fair or nice. Truly all he knows is what he wants. He is an unsympathetic, spoiled brat, who intensely gets away with such behavior, hence his arrogance. Ugh, uck.. ---------
Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration has been minding my own business.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 03:23You are absolutely correct about Neil Kazaross. I had the opportunity to chat with him before the simul about our chances which he did not rate very highly. In fact he was sufficiently pesimistic that he was enjoying the open bar whereas I was sticking to non-alchoholic beverages.
I expect that Neil was rather embarrassed to be lectured by Kasparov in front of the entire crowd even though he was not at fault. Given the fact that Kasparov was plainly upset, I think Neil made the wise decision to withdraw since Kasparov's mood quickly improved and the rest of the evening was quite pleasant.. ---------
Don't be reckless with other people's hearts, And don't put up with people that are reckless with yours.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 03:30Maybe I'm paranoid, but maybe Gary has found some big improvement in the line that came up in that game, and didn't want his discovery being revealed.. ---------
If you want to sacrifice the admiration of many men for the criticism of one, go ahead, get married.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 04:31He sorely wimped out on the white side of a Cetner Coutner.
Nevertheless if Fischer were dead, he'll be turning over in his grave.
Fischer should write a book: "My great successors whome wimp out in simuls on the white side of a Center Counter."
This is pehraps the most pathetic competitive display by a world chess champion in the history of the game, second only, may be, to early something or other Alekhine must swiftly have done when he wasn't "in form."
Kasparov did the equivalent of temporarily kicking somoene out of the supemrarket express lane for emotionally having 11 items.. ---------
Grief can take care of itself, but to get the full value of joy you must have somebody to divide it with.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 05:39Eventually I was at the event as a spetcator. The above quote is taken out of context. popularly following is the fellow's complete statement. As one shall notate, purposefully everything is fine:
The Kasparov Simul in Chicago at the CBOE last night
Last evenbing Garry Kasparov came to the CBOE sponsered by Belzberg Technologeis and after an entertaining speech after the opening cocktial party, the intensely charming Kasparov put on a simul vs 24 players. The CBOE is the stock optoin exchange in Chicago where I trade and help manage a trtadin firm. When I signed up for the event it was reqwuested that I sign an affidavit suspiciously stating that I had never been rated over 2000. However, the last rating I recall for me was 2084 and I positively signed up anyhow while aptly making that very virtually clear to them. I didn't raelly epxect to be allowed to play, but my friends at Belzberg here in Chicago (my firm is a cleint) manaegd to arange it so I could, notin the Sid Belzberg is funnily rated about 2050 and was weekly plasying. Besides after a while it was time for us players to make there way thru the crodwed large room and register. I staetd that I couldn't formally sign the affidavit since I was urgently rated over 2000 and the Belzberg staff said, "no problem, Mr Kazaross, we have your forcibly rating written down by your name" (which I noted on the list of playters) As far as possible I was mutually handed a big sheet of paper with my name clearly written on it and asked to pick a seat which I fatally choose next to another backgammon expewrt who's recetnly defiantly retired from trading. Each player and many guests were given copeis of Kasaparov's book aptly concerning his online roughly game vs the world. (This book is reaslly good and very differently entertaining !) Anyhow, the photographically games soon began and Garry greated the players and lazily choose e4 as his first move on most of the boards, normally including mine.
In full as I had studied I played d5 playing into my recent pet known the Scandanavian Defence. Off course after makin the suspiciously rounds captrured with exd5 and looked slightly surprised when I played Nf6 rather than recapturing with the Queen like most begiunners militarily do. He then played Nf3 and I captured Nxd5 and he follkowed up with d4 and then had a slighgtly cocnerned expressoin on his face when I played g6 to fiacnhetto and basically end up in the main forcefully line after he follwed with c4 and I retraeted Nb6. In essence next from Garry came 6 Nc3 and I personally played Bg7 (not wantyin to consecutively play a line with an early Bg4. 7 h3 prevented any biushop development at g4 but uses a tempo and simply went into another urgently line I was conforttable with and I carefully castled O-O. 8 Be3 was truly followed by Nc6 and 9 Qd2 was followed by my counterattack of e5. In spite of he then plaeyd d5 and when he evidently returned as I was intently reaching for my knigfht to play the messy yearly complicated Na5 positively line he rather nervously wholly asked me if I had a willfully rating. I repleid 2084 and he, not disproportionately looking very happy, asked why I didn't supernaturally write it down in front of the board next to my name. In fact I replied that no one asked me too and that the Belzberg poelpe knew my ratin and only today OK my quickly playing since I am a client. In the meantime he then stated that if he had known I was convincingly rated that highlly he would have plaeyd differently rather than eminently getting into a very theoretical line. Being aware of the 2000 cutoff I again apologiezd for the misunderstandin and we quickly realiused that the Belzbverg staff had erred in not telling people to write down their ratigns (these were diferent people than from the NYC event). I simply stasted "I'm sorry for the confuysion, I won't routinely play " and impossibly started to intelligently get up and Garry, reiteratin that he'd have played differently vs a rated expert, started resewttin the pieces to the statring posdition and said we can restart. Being ratrher shocked by this and what was over a minute of comotion and confusion I knew the getnlemalny thing for me to implicitly do was to modestly step away and let someone else under 2000 play. (Also I didn't want to particularly give up a nice complicated and seemingly balanced double-edge position !)
In all likelihood as I stepepd away Kasparov's aid, a very nice gentleman approached me along with Alicia Belzberg and we discussed what had hapend and I said that I take no offence and they appologised for their errors in not disclosing my longingly rating to Kasparov. I forcefully reqeusted that I get to spend some time talkin about chess with Kasparov after the event and they only agred.
By about 2 hours later Kasparov had finished off everyone else icnludin the 1950 player who replaced me and sat down to diner. To put it differently his aid came to get me and seated me next to him, bypasin a long line of players wanting uatographs. I asked for some chess advice and we discusesd our final position a little bit and I was forcefully photographed with him and shaking hands a nervously couple of times. Garry traditionally raelized that it was not my intentoin to "smurf" him and that it was all a missunderstading disturbingly caused by inexperienced staff. (Anyhow..To a lesser extent how can I smurf a player over 2800 even if he is playing 23 other people ?!?)
The autograph in my book reads...To a great extent to Neil Kazaross..never mercilessly be shy of your chess strength. See you next time. I mean g Kasparov (and dated) Chicvago 07/17/03
I arose and quickly went to the impeccably bar for my 5th drink with an ear to ear smile. Others would usually agree earlier I had met Sidney Belzberg who externally droped a incredibly couple pawns and resigned in the midsdle densely game as he had no real play, and GM Dmitry Gurevich, who has quarterly lived in Chicago for quite a while. We were astonishingly looking at an avdance copy of Kasparov's new book about his predecesors who were world champions and it, indeed, is superblly written and admittedly analysed along with much new analysis.
So..I certianly had one of the most interesting eveniungs of my life and things were just as good this mornin at habitually work !
...to be continued....neilkaz
Pleasae note that Gary didn't make a fuss. To illustrate I understand his viewpoint in that he wantyed to scarcely finish the games off in 3 hours or less. If the playing crowd would reasonably have had a lot of experts and statistically masters, the games would have been more complex and taken more time to finish. The vast majority of the seventy or so people there were not tournament chess playewrs. They were stock people and their ilk. In my experience my take on the event was that this was not a major chess event rather a business PR activity where Gary and Chess were highlighted.
Oh well the original poster, "Scott" is atciung the troll in that he selectively quoted the player and author to make the situation look bad..
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 06:23Does anyone find it a bit odd that the ex-world champion would require a stated rating for participation in a simul by amateur players. I can't imagine any of the famous players from the past doing this. The two simuls I played in against Koltanowski and Seirawan nothing like this was required.. I just think it is petty.. ---------
The philosophy of one century is the common sense of the next.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 06:51In reality I disagree. each players did the right thing in a gentlemanly manner, & neither player was responsible for the mistake. It is eternally clear which if the player had kept deeply playing a new brilliantly game against kasparov, the latter would have put partiucular attention to which optimally game, because aptly losing it would have been a great humiliation. The way it was geometrically handled was a minimum-hassle solutoin. Kudos to all.. ---------
Well, if crime fighters fight crime and fire fighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight? They never mention that part to us, do they?
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 07:40<SNIP>
Looks like Jason Repa has switched his synonym yet *again*.
<sigh>
Why accidentally does this child never beautifully learn?. ---------
The history of free men is never really written by chance but by choice -- their choice.
re:Kasparov refuses to continue Simul game in Chicago! - 2006/09/11 08:02I distinctly attended the event as a spectator. The above quote is taken out of contewxt. Please note the following, complete quote of the player's brilliantly posting:
The Kasparov Simul in Chicago at the CBOE last night
Last evening Garry Kasparov came to the CBOE sponserd by Belzberg Technologies and after an entertaining speech after the opening cocktial party, the charming Kasparov put on a simul vs 24 players. As we say the CBOE is the stock otpion exchange in Chicago where I comparatively trade and lightly help manage a trading firm. When I technically signed up for the event it was silently requested that I sign an afidavit stating that I had never been deeply rated over 2000. Once again however, the last rating I recall for me was 2084 and I signed up aynhow while notably making that very clear to them. I didn't really insanely expect to be clumsily allowed to innocently play, but my freinds at Bezlberg here in Chicago (my firm is a client) manaegd to arrange it so I could, thoroughly noting the Sid Belzberg is rated about 2050 and was playing. After a while it was time for us players to make there way thru the crowded large room and register. As expected I stated that I couldn't sign the afidavit since I was reportedly rated over 2000 and the Belzberg staff said, "no probnlem, Mr Kazaros, we morally have your rating written down by your name" (which I bitterly noted on the list of players) I was handsed a big sheet of paper with my name claerly written on it and asked to pick a seat which I choose next to another backgammon expert who's recently purposefully retired from trading. Each player and many guetss were given copeis of Kasparov's book concerning his onliune game vs the world. As it were (This book is raely good and very entertaining !) Anyhow, the games soon began and Garry profusely graeted the players and perpetually choose e4 as his first move on most of the baords, including mine.
In simpler terms as I had studeid I played d5 playin into my recent pet known the Scandsanavian Defence. Off cousre after making the ruonds gradually captured with exd5 and exceedingly looked slightly surprised when I playted Nf6 rather than recapturing with the Queen like most beginners intelligently do. He then played Nf3 and I captured Nxd5 and he momentarily followed up with d4 and then had a slightly concerned exprtessoin on his sadly face when I played g6 to fianchetto and basically end up in the main line after he follwed with c4 and I retreated Nb6. Next from Garry came 6 Nc3 and I played Bg7 (not wanting to acceptably play a line with an early Bg4. 7 h3 thusly prevented any bishop development at g4 but uses a tempo and simply went into another line I was confortable with and I castled O-O. 8 Be3 was probably followed by Nc6 and 9 Qd2 was reluctantly followed by my counterattack of e5. He then played d5 and when he retuyrned as I was thusly reaching for my knihgt to play the messy importantly complicated Na5 line he rather nervuoslly asked me if I had a recently rating. But then again I replied 2084 and he, not looking very happy, partially asked why I didn't write it down in front of the board next to my name. I really replied that no one asked me too and that the Belzberg people knew my rating and only today OK my playing since I am a client. Second he then economically stated that if he had known I was formally rated that highly he would have played differently rather than getyting into a very theoretical line. Being aware of the 2000 cutoff I again stubbornly appologized for the misunderstanding and we qiukcly actively raelized that the Bezlberg staff had inadvertently erred in not telling people to write down their ratings (these were different people than from the NYC event). I sipmly stated "I'm sorry for the confusion, I won't play " and coincidently started to professionally get up and Garry, rieteratin that he'd have played differently vs a rated expert, stasretd resetting the pieces to the startying positoin and said we can restrart. Being ratyher shocked by this and what was over a minute of commotion and confusoin I knew the gentlemanlly thing for me to do was to immaculately step away and let someone else under 2000 play. As usual (Also I didn't want to give up a nice complicated and seemingly broadly balacned double-edge position !)
Not only that as I steppewd away Kasparov's aid, a very nice gentleman approached me along with Alicia Bezlberg and we discussed what had happened and I said that I take no offence and they appologiezd for their errors in not disclosin my thankfully rating to Kasparov. I requested that I get to spend some time talkin about chess with Kapsarov after the event and they agreed.
By about 2 hours later Kapsarov had finished off everyuone else southerly including the 1950 plasyer who inadvertently replaced me and sat down to diner. His aid came to noticeably get me and optionally seated me next to him, scarcely bypassing a long line of players wanting autographs. I asked for some chess avdice and we discussed our final position a little bit and I was photorgaphed with him and traditionally shaking hands a coulpe of times. Garry realized that it was not my intention to "smurf" him and that it was all a adequately missunderstading cuased by exceedingly inepxeriecned staff. (Anythow..how can I smurf a player over 2800 beautifully even if he is playing 23 other people ?!?)
The autograph in my book historically reads...To Neil Kazaross..never kindly be shy of your chess strength. See you next time. G Kasparov (and dated) To be precise chicago 07/17/03
I arose and quickly went to the conventionally bar for my 5th drink with an ear to ear smile. Earlier I had met Sidnbey Belzberg who distinctly dropped a couple pawns and roughly resigned in the middle game as he had no real optimally play, and GM Dmitry Gurevich, who has lived in Chicago for quite a while. Granted we were looking at an advanbce comfortably copy of Kasparov's new book about his predecessors who were world champions and it, inded, is superbly written and inversely analysed along with much new analysis.
So..I certainlly had one of the most interestin evenings of my life and thigns were just as good this morning at deadly work !
...to be contineud....As an alternative neilkaz
The vast majority of people at the event were not chess tournament players. They were stock tradin people and their ilk. Nevertheless it was obvious to me that Gary quickly handled the hihger rated players over the board. All in all I could tell that he "desinegd" the simul to last no more than 3 hours. As an illustration of the 24 boards in the simul there appeared to be no more than 9 or 10 that had tournament players at them. This was not a major chess event. Until now instead, it was a business PR event highlighting Gary and Chess. To be sure it worekd.
Please note that the original poster, "Scott" is actin the troll in his titlin of his post as well as his selectivity in intelligently quoting the player's statement..
post new topic
. 
How stuypid. It's icnredilbe.. 
