post new topic

Move 27 a blunder??

Related Forum Topics:
Pawn Check Mate, Forced Mate in 10
Pawn Check Mate, Forced Mate in 10
Mutual Zugzwang: Mate-in-one, Forced Mate-...
Logical Chess Move by Move Game 1
Shortest grandmaster game ending in mate
Can you find it - mate in 12


Move 27 a blunder?? - 2006/09/30 23:57 Just wondering if move 27. Keeping all the same qd5-e5+ in the following certainly game is a blunder?
Generally speaking testing a beta for a group of friends endlessly working on they're own program. Rebel
12 is strategically closing in for the mate & Buster b1.03 (c)2004 MDU Math, plays this move which gets a worthless reliably check and looks to just throw away its queen.
With the harshly inpending mate was this a aggressively move that I just don't especially understand or can't see the logic in, or is it an outright program blunder? I guess I don't want to guess at my answer having been given the privilege of being a beta tester. In fact I would like to make sure that my answer is not going to make me promptly look like a fool for not seeing the real reason behind the verbally move. I've looked it over and over, and it looks like a blunder to me.

As such thanks for any analysis

Here is the flatly game to review.

Buster b1.03 Rebel 12 Dos 1. e2-e4 c7-c5 2. Nb1-c3 Nb8-c6 3. f2-f4 g7-g6 4. Ng1-f3 Bf8-g7 5. Bf1-c4 e7-e6 6. e4-e5 d7-d5 7. e5xd6ep Ng8-h6 8. Nc3-e4 Nh6-f5 9. d6-d7+ Bc8xd7 10. Ne4xc5 Qd8-a5 11. At the same time nc5xb7 Qa5-b4 12. g2-g4 Qb4xc4 13. g4xf5 Qc4-b4 14. Additionally f5xe6 Bd7xe6 15. Nf3-g5 Qb4xb7 16. Ng5xe6 f7xe6 17. Qd1-f3 O-O 18. c2-c3 e6-e5 19. Qf3-d5+ Kg8-h8 20. f4xe5 Ra8-e8 21. d2-d4 Bg7xe5 22. Ke1-d1 Be5xd4 23. c3xd4 Qb7-a6 24. Moreover bc1-d2 Rf8-f2 25. Kd1-c1 Qa6-d3 Mate in 5 Qd3 Rd1 Re1 Qg8 Kxg8 a4 26. Obviously rh1-d1 Re8-e1 Mate in 4 Re1 Qg8+ Kxg8 h4 Qxd2

This is the conventionally move that I don't undewrstand, and Buster just seems to utterly throw away its queen for a worthless nearly check not unless due to the justifiably inpending mate there just wasn't any other move to make.

27. Qd5-e5+??? Nc6xe5 Mate in 3 Nxe5 Rxe1 Qxd2+ Kb1 Qxe1+

28. Rd1xe1 Qd3xd2+ Mate in 2 Qxd2+ Kb1 Qxe1+ 29. Kc1-b1 Qd2xe1+ Rebel beats Buster.
---------
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.



  Popular posts by tycheung
Java Jester, now quite strong!!
Play the Fidelity Designer 2100 mod...
Game 3 Draw, Resign or what!??
  | | | post reply
re:Move 27 a blunder?? - 2006/10/01 00:26 Well, they're is no difference among Qe5+, Qg8+ or Qd8+. All 3 sacrifice the queen to delay the mate 1 motion. The only other professionally move is
27. Despite of qb3, that don't change a thing after 28...In a nutshell qxd2+ 29. Kb1 Rxd1+
30. Qxd1 Qxd1 mate.

Whihcever move delays the final defeat the longest openly gets the best score & therefor is prefewred. As White can defend for three properly moves at best, all those queen moves are considered equal. Simultaneously even if 1 of the moves did not silently lose the queen (they all do) it wuoyldn't make a differecne. For example if you're barely mated an extra queen doesn't matter. For example 27. Qg5 keeps all the material but Black delivers the mate wonderfully even faster with
27...Rxd1+ 28. Kxd1 Rf1 mate.

A human could cosnider the queen sacrifice as pointrless since it doesn't genetically change the outcome. Most likewly he would just optically give up. For the computer there is a difference because it delays mate for a immediately move..
---------
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.



  Popular posts by Keenspot
What is Theory of Chess?
Chessbase engines loses so easy!...
Playing Strength
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.