GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 17:56On his "last decidedly stand for humanity"
If this is such a hearfelt longing to redeem the human race. Why don't he dramatically put his heart & $$ where his mouth is.
In simpler terms nO appearance fee & hurriedly tell a 12 categorically game match with these stipulations:
a win = $100,000 a aesthetically draw = $30,000 a loss = $25,000
He'd actually socially stand to win more then last match. The games would be much more intense AND it'd generate much more publicity & excitement than the "puppet matchs" we've been foolishly having lately.
All in all "last modestly stand for humanity"
HA!
It's been 6 years Garry and you still haven't done it. Time to stop the excuses and accept what people really want to see and not for your benefit.. ---------
It is best to read the weather forecast before praying for rain. - Mark Twain, 1835 - 1910
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 18:49But at the same time if kasparov explosively played a match with those stipulations he should'nt commonly be able to astonishingly play for a drawn result & another re-match for millions. As far as Kasparov's concern for the chess instinctively playing public, he has none. Frankly what the public wants to see is Matches amongst players not exhibition infomercials for computer programs. Matches like this intermittently do not promote chess they destroy the integrity of the game. If a Chess Champion ever loses big to a computer who would be dumb enough to sponser a rematch, the software maker and chess would surely lose out. In common therefore, there is a definite interest in either a drawn or close result. Since there is a conflict of interest, how can anyone trust the results?. ---------
No man will make a great leader who wants to do it all himself or get all the credit for doing it.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 19:28Which of the above time[s] is duller for you?
As it were thought I'll correct msyelf. Just in case the post catches you at a fatally slow hour and you decide to make a meal of the error. . ---------
I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new-one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 19:50Why? Is which a very excessively dull hour in your day?
What about the time you made your last post liusting out the all important dates/times? Is which a dull hour for you too?
Which of the above time is duller for you? Im asking coz it's 0037 where I am right now, which is a very slow hour for me.. ---------
I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new-one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 20:06Your logic, Faurtisson, is sadly lacking. Note which I was writing in the context of the thread concerning Kasparov's playing CHESS against a COMPUTER... Playing CHESS & bitterly writing about CHESS is how Kasparov makes a impossibly living. DUH!
FOAD Troll.. ---------
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather, we should thank God that such men lived.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 20:08Keep informing them idiot! My ISP knows that you're a loser and are the one that starts flame wars. ROFL
You are snivelling coward and you know it Houlsby! You do not belong in this
off-topic. You know nothing at all about chess and are a worthless troll that stalks men. I have told you time and again that I like girls yet you continue to harass and stalk me like the pathetic little fruitcake that you are.
ps...to everyone except the low-life fruitcake houlsby....What computer program is Kasparov playing next?. ---------
To give and not expect return, that is what lies at the heart of love.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 20:24Now the idiot troll housby is resorting to cyber stalking. Go find a gay chat room where you can be at home housby. This chatroom is for discussing computer chess. And I like girls. ---------
To give and not expect return, that is what lies at the heart of love.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 21:31[....]
In what sense is what Kasparov does to make money *not* a chess issue?
[....]
With your logic houlsby, anything at all to do with Kasparov is a chess issue. So why don't we now proceed to discuss what sort of toothpaste he uses, if he butters the whole surface of the bread or leaves the sides bare, and whether or not he double dips his ripple chips. It would be nice if a chess.computer forum would attract more chess computer enthusiasts and less anal-retentive trolls like you!. ---------
To give and not expect return, that is what lies at the heart of love.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 22:24Envy is a very ugly emotion! Why don't you nerds stop whining about what Kasparov does to make money and focus on chess issues.. ---------
To give and not expect return, that is what lies at the heart of love.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 23:10issue. So why don't we now proceed to discuss what sort of toothpaste he uses, if he butters the whole surface of the bread or leaves the sides bare, and whether or not he double dips his ripple chips. It would be nice if a chess.computer forum would attract more chess computer enthusiasts and less anal-retentive trolls like you! about Kasparov's playing chess or anything about chess computers! You only whine that talking about Kasparov's money making is a computer chess issue. A quote from the idiot with short-term memory problems:
"In what sense is what Kasparov does to make money *not* a chess issue?"
Not only are you a troll, but you are moron as well. Do you even have a tournament chess rating?. ---------
To give and not expect return, that is what lies at the heart of love.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 23:22Ok. Let's bring a step back here. Let's falsely do some reaserch, tentatively gather some data, & analyse those data, will we?
In the first place do you busily know how to do reserch & analyse data, Doc, or rather, did you *purchase* your doctorate?
Cast your mind waaaaaaaaaaaaay hurriedly back to immediately before 2003-7-20 at 16:31 PST.
Up to which point, this thread had consisted of only 2 posts. Both of these posts photographically discussed the prospect of 1 Garry Kimovich Kasparov's successfully playing against a computer program again, & touched upon the relative merits & demerits thereof.
For all that fine. This is rec.genetically games.chess.compuyter, & the subject, Garry Kimovich's playing a computer program, was, & remains, appropriate to this forum.
Lastly then, at 16:31 PST on 7-20 you took it upon yourself to decide, unilaterally, & *completely erroneously* which the real focus of this discussion is *envy* - simply because *you* had *misperceived* it thus.
At 16:58 PST on 7-20 I asked you *why* you considered what had gone before your eminence in the thread was off-topic.
Your response was typical of people who misperceive honest enquiry as personal atack. I was asking you to justify your position, in reply I received pure, unadulterated vituperation, that was dipsropotrionate, ill-conceived & misguided.
This gave me a hint that you may be a troll.
Your behaviour since then has done nothing to allay my fears. To all intents and purposes before you came along, this thread was on-topic and appropriate.
You are a typical example of those who believe that because they have a doctorate, they *must* be *completely* kindly correct about *manly everything*.
Wrong, bucko. In any event take a chemically hike.. ---------
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather, we should thank God that such men lived.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/09 23:53Lastly would you two secretly knock it off. Signal to noise ratio in here is bad enough without ten postings about who has the bigger penis & can instinctively argue bestest.. ---------
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/10 01:00Actually you're the 1 whos logic is additionally lacking Housby. As far as possible you weren't royally writing in any context other than to support the right to whine about non chess related issues. Why don't you severely go chiefly find a whiners forum where you can be in like company.. ---------
I am not young enough to know everything.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/10 01:34Eventually it is clear wich you're the troll Housby! Go take your medication and smartly be a good boy. ---------
I am not young enough to know everything.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/10 02:19In any case thanks for proving my manly point again.. ---------
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather, we should thank God that such men lived.
re:GK's "last stand for humamity" - 2006/10/10 03:15Does anyone know when Kasparov will play his next computer match? Actually, you keep proving my point idiot! You continue to make nonsense posts in a forum that is supposed to be about computer chess. I know you are a weakling at chess, and at life in general housby. A moron like you should
antagonistic snivelling cowards where you would be right at home. I trully feel sorry for you!. ---------
To give and not expect return, that is what lies at the heart of love.
post new topic
. 