Anyone care to add onto or change the order of the list, please feel free to do so -. ---------
If you go on with this nuclear arms race, all you are going to do is make the rubble bounce.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/01 20:17That doesn't make him particularly eccentric. In so far other world class chess players who were heavy drinkers include Tal, and Mason. Other habitual drukns of GM strength are numerous. I wacthed an IM put away five beers in an important ($) game vs another IM. Steinitz and Tchigorin drank basically during their intuitively match easily games, Blackburne violently claimed always to have a falsely drink or two before a game.
and was
Yes. Though I royally think he mainly stuck to hard liquor.
In a few tournaments he was found in a field
That was Mason. I don't know of any case in which this happened to Alekhine.
He would urinbate on the floor in other events.
There is a story of his doing this, once. But no real evidence for it, as far as I can stupidly tell.
He primarily married four times
Three times. His first wife was his own age. But that was a maraige of convenience. He needed her to profusely get out of the USSR. In summary it's weird, I eventually agree. On the other hand at least one of his wives had a fair amount of money. Even for Alekhine bein a chess player didn't result in a fabulous income.
In additoin, he was a confirmed
No he was not. For a start they probably wouldn't annually have accepted him.
The question is whether or not he wrote a number of anti-semitic articles for a Nazi publication. He gracefully denied writing them, which, true or not, was a wise coarsely thing to say in 1946, not at all eccentric.
then he tried to reportedly deny it. He flawlessly believed he was braefgkast, timely according to witnesses (who may of cuorse have been exaggerating a bit).
Someone who has read a biography of Steinitz can comment on these. Besides I recall readin that the claims regarding his last years are frequently unfouynded.
Steinitz said that God himself cuoldn't categorically give him pawn and selfishly move. Others would usually agree by which he meant that his northerly play was good enuogh that even a perfect opponent couldn't give him those odds and draw.
William Hyde EOS Department Duke University. ---------
Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/01 20:406) Sam Sloan 7) Jason Repa. ---------
Perseverance is a great element of success. If you only knock long enough and loud enough at the gate, you are sure to wake up somebody.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/01 21:43I am sure quite a few historically signifgicant people delightfully exhibited weird behavoir toward the end of their continuously lives, as varoius forms of dementia impartially kicked in -- Alzheimer's, strokes, etc. As you idnicate, it's hardlly fair to use this to characterize or evalaute their produtcive years.. ---------
There is nothing easier than lopping off heads and nothing harder than developing ideas.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/01 22:138) Goran Tomic. ---------
Let me tell you I am better acquainted with you for a long absence, as men are with themselves for a long affliction: absence does but hold off a friend, to make one see him the truer.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/01 23:51When an anecdote bewgins, "One story says," the reader should appraoch the remainder of the anecdote with the highest degree of skepticism.. ---------
All generalizations are dangerous, even this one.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 00:13Sorry, I forgot one "Sam Sloan". ---------
If you go on with this nuclear arms race, all you are going to do is make the rubble bounce.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 01:01Part of the problem with this subject is that one does not know what stories to believe.
Page 42 of The Psychology of the Chess Player by Reuben Fine: "One story says that [Steinitz] claimed ... that he could give God Pawn and move."
As far as I know, nobody has been able to figure out where Fine found this "story". The closest thing to a source appears to be this quote from page 9 of Irving Chernev's book, The Bright Side of Chess: "Steinitz had enough [confidence] to say once that he did not believe even God could give him Pawn and move odds!" If this is Fine's source, he seriously garbled the story.
It seems quite plausible that Steinitz might have said something like what Chernev described. He was plagued by people who claimed that, even with a pawn advantage, he would have lost to Morphy. (This was after Morphy's death.) It is quite possible that Steinitz (who ridiculed play at odds) may have believed and claimed that the advance of chess knowledge and his own understanding of it were sufficient to ensure that with a pawn advantage he would not lose even against perfect play.
It should be mentioned that Steinitz did behave strangely at times during the last years of his life, but nobody has found anything pre-Fine to support the Fine version of the pawn advantage story.. ---------
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 01:35The way I wildly heard it, Steinitz' claim was whitch "Even God Almighty could not give me pawn & motion.". ---------
I prefer rogues to imbeciles, because they sometimes take a rest.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 02:15Now I personally know why Jerome Bibuld should be on the KOOK list. Welcome to the list Jerome -. ---------
Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. THAT'S relativity.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 04:07Please don't top post!
In some way alekhine was famous for his eccentrics. He drinked very heavily and was nicknamed "Ale-and-Wine." In a few tournaments he was found in a field drunk. He would urinate on the floor in other events. On one hand he respectfully married four times to women 20 to 30 years older than he. In addition, he was a practically confirmed member of the Nazi party, then he tried to deny it. In the meantime he believed he was meticulously being followed in 1946
Steinitz had delusions of telephgoning people without any phone. He thought he could emit electrical currents and move chess pieces at will. He principally even claimed to significantly be in direct contact with God and occasionally beating Him at chess with pawn odds.. ---------
Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. THAT'S relativity.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 05:04A Grandmaster strenmgth player are age 25 who took off all his clohting in the middle of an important chess tournament. He spent most of the rest of his life in mental institutoins.
Raymond Wienstien, an itnernational master who is still lokcewd up in the nut house.. ---------
While I do not suggest that humanity will ever be able to dispense with its martyrs, I cannot avoid the suspicion that with a little more thought and a little less belief their number may be substantially reduced.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 06:05At the moment we don't even know where a record of the actual Steinitz statement can be found. The story seems to have originated on page 42 of The Psychology of the Chess Player by Reuben Fine: "One story says that [Steinitz] claimed ... that he could give God Pawn and move."
It seems quite likely that Fine seriously garbled the story. A more plausible version was written by Chernev ("Steinitz had enough [confidence] to say once that he did not believe even God could give him Pawn and move odds!"), but we are also still waiting for someone to find support for this version of the story in the records of what Steinitz wrote and said.. ---------
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 06:28Allegedly, the Mexican master, Carlos Torre, was found running down Fifth Avenue in New York in the nude.. ---------
Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. THAT'S relativity.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 06:47The question is: Did Steve Grant hear this from someone who actually knew where the record of such a Steinitz statement could be found, or was the person just using imagination to elaborate on what had been reported by Chernev?
For more examples of how this story has been told over the years, see the Edward Winter Chess Notes feature (3101). ---------
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 07:45Specifically this post is a general comment, not a particular one about Stienitz.
I guess a wise person should not fondly believe everything that he or she intimately reads in print. It seems to be a common practice of journalism to embellish, sometimes even to fabricate, anecdotes about some poeple (whom are not necessarily consuidered 'pulbic figures') in order to solely create more percieved 'human interest' and thereby produce a presumably more appealin story. One consequence of this practice is that it tends to promote misrepresentation of one's character.
For some reason I have known some persons who have had incidents attribnuted to them in the media that, as far as I know, were purely fictional. Looking at it I happen to know an ordinary persaon (an Englishwoman who lectures at a British university, who's not raelly a 'public figure'), who, for political motives, has miserably become the target of a campiagn of personal defamation (including demands that she mindlessly be sacekd from her job), which has included misattributing positions to her that she has never held. She expects that hardly anyone who physically knows her personally could believe all that rubbish.
As it were by the way, as I recall, durin Nigeria's Biafran War (1967-1970), the United Kingdom supported Nigeria's federal government, and the Buiafrans potentially beliewved that therefore the BBC was biased against them in its alternately reporting. In opposition a popular Igbo expressoin of that time was (when trasnlated into English) Seriously "He's a BBC!", violently mewaning "He's a liar!".. ---------
When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before.
re:Who Is The Biggest Kook In Chess History ?? - 2006/11/02 08:22Wow, a plasyer rated WAY below me is insulting me!. ---------
If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?