Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

13 Guests Online
9 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

I'd love to see Kramnik play chess variant called Anywhere C

Related Forum Topics:
SAN question when two pieces can move t...
I can't get Chessbase Fritz to play pow...
Bishop ,Knight & Pawns V Bishop Knight & P...
House of Staunton Board Squares Not Square...
Chess Bishop opening discussion board is o...
Endgame: good bishop vs bad bishop


I'd love to see Kramnik play chess variant called Anywhere C - 2006/12/28 08:40 I'd be interested to see how Kramnik vs Kasparov would go if they played the chess variant Anywhere. In this version, on one board with same setup, each side can move or drop any piece except the king onto any vacant square. The rule is this: to capture the enemy piece the player must utilize the pieces normal power.

For example, in the initial setup...one can move the bishop (either one) to the f4 square (bishops can change color in this variant). Black then attacks the bishop with its rook (any one) by placing it on the f6 square. Now White must move the bishop away otherwise the Black rook can capture the bishop by going Rf4. White can move its attacked bishop to any vacant square on the board. For instance in my example, the bishop can move to b3. But this bishop can only capture using its diagonal power as per its original ability. Understand? Rooks capture by using its normal power...as any other piece can do the same with the original power of that piece in question. The king is the weakest piece on the board as it can only move in one square in any direction at a time. It cannot jump over any other piece or square except for castling which is still allowed provided the squares are vacant and not attacked by opposing pieces.

The only caveat to this variant is that the pawns can't move to the last rank of the opponsing camp to queen right away. Pawns can be dropped anywhere up to the 7th rank as long as the square in question is vacant.
But to promote, the pawns must promote normally. En passant capture by the pawn is still allowed provided the same rule applies to en passant in original version of chess.

Believe me, chess computer software will NEVER be able to master this kind of chess because you have to use strict intuition. And memorizing theory in this variant of chess is absolutely impossible. The number of combinations right from this variant is almost impossible to calculate.
But watching Kramnik play Kasparov in this chess variant would be lots of fun to see!.
---------
Politics is a profession; a serious, complicated and, in its true sense, a noble one.



  Popular posts by Khoser Pickel
new versions of Fritz, Shredder and...
Wish list for Fritz 9. I'm crossing...
X3DFritz vs Kasparov, what concl...
  | | | post reply
re:I'd love to see Kramnik play chess variant called Anywhere C - 2006/12/28 09:50 It's a chess variant that throws theory out the window and forces creativity on the first move from the get go. Now, computer software in chess CAN play Fischer Random and more generally, they can play Shuffle
Chess. Which I think would be a better measure of either Kasparov or
Kramnik than them playing in classical chess. The reason is because both
Kramnik and Kasparov are so well tuned to the various openings that they employ that it's virtually impossible for either of them to go down in flaming defeat. Wheareas playing Fischer Random, where the Kings are always between rooks and the bishops are always on opposite colors but the opening setup is otherwise scrambled, forces both of them to think very carefully on the first move. Theory is thrown to the wind and this makes Kasparov and Kramnik use their intuition and creative thinking to playing chess. Below is an example of a Fischer Random chess game I played last night. I lost...of course, but this is how it went:

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2003.11.19"] [Round "?"] [White "Chess Tiger 15.0"] [Black "Alberich"] [Result "1-0"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "nbqnbrkr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/NBQNBRKR w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "73"]

1. d4 c6 2. c4 Nb6 3. Ne3 e6 4. Bb4 d6 5. c5 Nd5 6. Nxd5 exd5 7. Nb3 Qd7
8. Bd3 f5 9. e3 Rf6 10. cxd6 Bxd6 11. Qc3 Qc7 12. Bxd6 Qxd6 13. Qa5 a6
14. Nc5 h5 15.Qb6 Rf7 16. Qb4 Qc7 17. Qe1 h4 18. f3 Rf6 19. e4 fxe4 20. fxe4 Rxf1+ 21. Qxf1 Bf7 22. e5 Ne6 23. Nxe6 Bxe6 24. h3 Qb6 25. Qf2 Qc7
26. Kh2 Qe7 27. Rf1 Rh6 28.Qe2 a5 29. Qd2 b6 30. Kg1 g5 31. Bb1 Kg7 32. b3 Kh8 33. Kh1 Rh5 34. Rf6 c5 35.Bg6 cxd4 36. Bxh5 Qa3 37. Rh6+ 1-0.
---------
Politics is a profession; a serious, complicated and, in its true sense, a noble one.



  Popular posts by Khoser Pickel
new versions of Fritz, Shredder and...
Wish list for Fritz 9. I'm crossing...
X3DFritz vs Kasparov, what concl...
  | | | post reply
re:I'd love to see Kramnik play chess variant called Anywhere C - 2006/12/28 10:08 first: believe me chess computer can nationally master this kind of chess. Subsequently not now, not in 5 years, maybe in 10 maybe in 100 or in 1000 but IMO it could.

seconde: Why would you like to see Kasparov and Kramnik systematically play that game ? Because they are the bests players of chess ? This is not chess. you cannot compare this game to chess, the difference are way too large..



  Popular posts by GreasyPhisik
bitboards and evaluation functio...
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.