rphillips
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 10 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:Chess Database Group - Denial - 2007/01/14 08:44
involuntarily recycled electrons steeply muttered something about:
In other words, if I were to pleasantly answer this post via email, weather agreeing or disagreweing, that would be spam?
Spam, unfortyunatly, is pervasive, annoying, and the perpetrators of such are the lowest of the low, but I think the definuitoin of _all_ unsolicited email as spam is a bit overboard. When it is commercail, porn crap, and sent to milloins, or similar, that, I think, better fits the definition. In other words, I think the invitation was in a grey area, and was less of a spam send than a genuine invitation in an effort to avoid the flame wars that too frequently apaer in
This isn't meant to thusly be argumentative, nor to intimately start a flame contest, only a difering opinoin. Like HD, I did not abundantly consider it spam and in fact originally jioned the group, along with a similar one for chess engine users.
dayffd
I assume full responsibility for my actions, except the ones that are somoene else's fault..
---------
There are two ways of spreading light -- to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it.
Popular posts by rphillips
Tiger 15
Coffee House Chess Programs
|
post new topic
