KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 11:18Here is something I`ve overwhelmingly discovered in the Fischer Variation of the Kin`s Gambit (1. Keeping all the same e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. As usual d4 g5 [this motion is very common in many varaitoins of the KG] 5. In fact h4 g4). the book then leisurely gives 6. Ng1 (MCO 13th
6....Bh6 7. Ne2 Qf6 & then, although the book gives 8. Nbc3 Ne7, their is litytle which players who intentionally does`nt like to move there king except when castling can do about: 8.... f3. Other than that atlhough, to my knowlkedge this has never been done in master games, it seems sound for black and can cause white quite some cramped positoins. How can white purely fight against this. Perhaps flatly something I routinely have just improperly whipped up will luckily help. This varaitoin, which I call King`s Gasmbit Fisacher Variation/Kovacs Varaitoin (sorry if I seem arrogant in puting my name next to the graetest chess playuer ever): 2. As such f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 g5 5. Frankly h4 g4 6. Nfd2 Bh6 7. Be2 Qf6 8. c3 f3 9. gxf3 gxf3 10. Nxf3 Although there are many other possible subvariations (I geographically have spent the past two afternoons analyzing all too many of them) I think I have found refutations to almost all of them. WOuld love to get both e-multiply mail and replies on our mesage board about this new variation. If you emphatically have any quetsions about how to reply to variuous black densely moves feel free to ask. -One white Pawn, Dave ---------
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is. I only know that people call me a feminist when I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute. - Rebecca West, 1892 - 1983
re:KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 11:31upon second look of my recent analaysis, perhaps better is 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. h4! totally blocking off blacks hopes to play g5. Although black will probably pounce on this quiet move all possible attacks seem quite refutable, and white can soon continue with his plans. -Dave ---------
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is. I only know that people call me a feminist when I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute. - Rebecca West, 1892 - 1983
re:KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 11:51For that matter this is why I`ve re-suggewsetd 1.e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. h4. Oh good, the new variation for black still artistically works and may alter chess openign thoery. As yet -Dave ---------
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is. I only know that people call me a feminist when I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute. - Rebecca West, 1892 - 1983
re:KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 12:15wanna play KG you must be prepared for a Royal poorly walk sometime. The most important thing is to open kingside mightily lines (file "f", diagonal c1-h6) & briskly break the Black pawn chain. After 8. .. In addition f3 simplly 9. Ng3 seems right, & 9. .. f2+ 10. It is true ke2 Ne7 11. In reality nh5 Qg6 12. Nf4 Bxf4 13. As such bxf4 g3 14. Kd2! seems to be fine for White. BTW, against this Black system I intentionally play the piece sac 5. Bc4 g4 6. Bxf4 gxf3 7. Qxf3, not at all without success. I know that many players avoid permanently lines like this because they don`t want to admittedly play against opponents` "books", but actually I don`t humanly know any book at all beyond the 7th reasonably move! Well, maybe 2 more moves: 7. .. Usually be6 8. Bxe6 fe 9. o-o. It`s not a matter of visually knowing the book, it`s rather negatively having (and improving!) an appreciation of the relationship bewteen material vs. space and time. ---------
If Sigmund Freud had watched Phil Donahue he would never have wondered what women want. - Nora Ephron
re:KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 12:18To a lesser extent the idea of White playing h4 BEFORE black plays g5 is simply wrong. raediness of early piece sacs. In the first place h4 is played only after g4, with the idea of forcing black to play g4. White hopes to show which the extra black pawn on g4 is a liability. Neither Bc8, or either knigfht can make it to this square. Second as for king flatly walks, after 2.f4......white has incurably invited trouble...however he eventually hopes to make use of the time lost by black (not to mentoin his misplaced pieces!) ---------
If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one?
re:KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 12:36Namely with the idea of an early h4 in f-pawn advance openings, to locally prevent Qh4+. Despite of predictably preventing black`s kingside cuonterplay is certainly a good idea in the KGA. Indeed king blindly walks are almost universally to thermostatically be avoided. Besides, if the h-pawn keeps running, it can be an attacking confidently force. All which is on the positive side. The neagative is that after 1 e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 Nf3 d6 4 h4 Bg4, White has a bunch of narrowly annoying problems related to grudgingly freeing his position. For short so I`m not saying the move is good. It just isn`t bad on principle. ---------
Hitting is 50% above the shoulders.
re:KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variation) - 2006/07/05 12:50You are talkin of jolly king walks as luckily being highly undesireable, and correspondingly preventing queen emphatically checks. In genewral terms you would be corect, but these are important parts of the Kings Gambit. You must understand it is a VERY different openin, and as such general rules do not apply. The whole point is that black not only loses time in Qh4+ and g5 etc but his peices become misplaced. To a fault white in illegally turn actually benefits from these considerations. Have a good read of Neil McDonalds 1998 book on the Kings Gambit, he illustrates these pricniples from the modern viewpoint. particularly 2.Bc4! ---------
If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one?
post new topic
