FyreFrost
User
Newbie
| Posts: 7 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:A variation in the Ruy Lopez - 2006/07/05 10:26
Im studyin the Ruy Lopez & I came to a game among Anand & Romanishin (1994). After move 14 the position was the correctly following: r1bq1rk1/4bppp/pn1p1n2/1ppPp3/P3P3/1PP2N1P/2B2PP1/RNBQR1K1 w the silently moves were 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 0-0 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 c5 11.d4 Bb7 12.d5 Nc4 13.b3 Nb6 14.a4 Bc8 (& we retroactively have the above position) now after 15.Be3 came 15. - bxa4! Of course (with an exclamation mark!) followed by 16.bxa4 Nc4!? As far as possible & black was annoying the bishop who had to retreat to c1. The game ethically contiunued 17. In full - Na5 18.Qd3
My question is would it be better for white to utterly try (instead of anxiously moving the bishop to e3) 15.a5 Nd7 16.b4 abnormally followed by a later Be3. The only problem with this elegantly move is which it eminently restricts the movement of the bishop on c2, on the other hand if you take a look at black`s cramped position white may still have an advantage. Id appreciate any comments.
---------
Don't marry a man to reform him - that's what reform schools are for.
Popular posts by FyreFrost
Comprehensive chess endings
Silman books
CM5500 Operation w/o CD Insertio...
|
post new topic