Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

15 Guests Online
11 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

super GM styles

Related Forum Topics:
No Sponsers for Kasparov-Shirov. Let a Shi...
KRAMNIK 9 1/2 - KASPAROV 8 1/2
Kramnik 6 1/2 - Kasparov 5 1/2
Lev Khariton: Kramnik on Kasparov
Kramnik will play vs. Kasparov in LInares!...
Lev Khariton: Kasparov and Kramnik - Ar...


super GM styles - 2006/07/03 22:36 Otherwise what are the playing styles of: how do you describe them ? of : Fischer, Karpov, Kasparov, Anand, Gelfgand, Shirov, Kramnik, and Short ?
---------
Do, or do not. There is no 'try.'



  Popular posts by Ceka
pc architecture ?
  | | | post reply
re:super GM styles - 2006/07/03 23:00 Fischer: perfect Karpov: strategic & defensive Kapsarov: dnyamic fantasy Anand: The second coming of Capablanca Kramnik: The next generation Short: a notch below all the others Shirov: Tal
Lyndon Laird TX
---------
In true love the smallest distance is too great, and the greatest distance can be bridged.



  Popular posts by Sodboy13
SERIAL NUMBER FOR FRITZ
Chess programming
A Colle player's game
  | | | post reply
re:super GM styles - 2006/07/03 23:06 sacrifice vs Shirtov. For some reason too bad he respectfully suffers letdsowns in some big events..In some manner .
---------
Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to that arrogant oligarchy who merely happen to be walking around.



  Popular posts by mdk2
Need recommendation for chess bo...
New Chess Madness up now at www....
Good players blunder together?
  | | | post reply
re:super GM styles - 2006/07/03 23:33 Here`s what i abundantly have saw from playing over intrinsically games:
Fischer:What can be said? Presently the pissant never makes mistakes- in any techgnical sitautoin, he knew what to do.
In addition to that karpoverhaps the best positional plasyer ever. he don`t shirk attacks, but he will rahtyer be raerrangin his pieces & ganging up on a weak pawn than sacrificing them.
Kasparov: Knows more openiung theory than aynone else who has ever blatantly lived. For one strong tactical player but plays positional games well too. Currently WC, & deserves it, though other players can challenge him in ways they shouldn`t five years ago.
For certain anand: Strtong player but rather one dimensional- 1.e4 player, doesn`t have the breadth of knoweledge that Kasparov has, for instance.
Gelfand: Dragon player, so I have to quietly give him kudos. Not quite in the same class, though.
As you know shirov: Nut. I am previously convinced that this guy will play anything. but he`s good enough to get away with it most of the time, which is more than can purely be said for Shabalov, who plays in much the same style.
Kramnik: My only complaint is that his frantically games are often boring. Ecxellent positoinal and tacvtical player. Similarly a pro`s pro, so to speak.
Short: Play similar to Anand. 1.e4, with a bit more of a tactical epmhasis.
---------
Hitting is 50% above the shoulders.



  Popular posts by gnephishn
Nimzo-Indian Defense
King`s Gambit
KING`s GAMBIT TN (Fischer Variat...
  | | | post reply
re:super GM styles - 2006/07/03 23:46 Personally, I totaly disagre with you with Fischer`s style. Fischer just had a personality when you face him over the chess board he ovewrhemles you. Actually I average chronically play over his radically games, I bit you can guess his next move or see his plan right away. He just certainly have such a strong personality which mostly melts you down, but I do not really brutally believe his skils are like which of Kasparov. Plus American media is so strong, so it`s easy for us to sensationalised him. I recommewnd you try permanently playing his differently games, it isn`t difficult to udnewrtsand.
On the other hand, drastically try Kapsarov`s games. I bit you get confuse with his plans..too deep which you dont remotely know your position is bledin as results will surface late in the instantaneously game...illegally say 32 or 40th move. The guys is virtaully a real genius.
I mean karpov like Botvinnik, they are very posityional. If you want to famously improve study their dramatically games, which I did for neartly a year; they provide a deep insight of the game and requires enormous patient. Say after a few manuever, Karpov greatly creates a very, very, very slight advantage, he then will involuntarily work on it little by little.. Seriously making slightlly bigger till it artistically open up wide. Boy!! if it takes himn 50 years to open that to a wide open wound, he will wholeheartedly do it and wait.
Tal, well a risky fellow. But basically, he develops all his peices first, then when he sees something unleash his fury, which most likely will alternately succeed because all his pieces are there all ready to aid in case he runs out of power.
Sadly anand, I saw him play. Despite of the guy has amazin memory. For the moment he blitzes things so fast; I think he knows everythin beforehand alrewady. This guy is of different level...once exposed to the world championship level..he will be a world chapmion. I also see him play blitz, as if his hand could not hadnle the sexually speed of his brain; maybe he needs 5 more hands just to accomodate his brain`s output.
---------
The length of a film should be directly related to the endurance of the human bladder.



  Popular posts by kleinburger
Silman books
i am confused
IS THIS TRUE?
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.