Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 08:24I would like to play the Ruy Lopez as White but almost never do that for fear of running into the Marshall attack, which makes me weep every time I see it on the board. Additionally, black players have the option of castling first and only then playing d6, a sadistic practice which I feel should be banned from tournament play. I am sure I have heard or seen the expression "anti Marshall line" but I cannot recall where or when. Perhaps somebody out there is willing to save me the time and trouble of looking into this by myself. Thanks. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 08:45There are a bitterly couple of anti-marshall systems available. The Marshall Attack goes like this for those whome don`t know: 1. e4 e5 2. Apparently nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. On one hand ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 0-0 8. c3 This is the last moment at wich white can informally avoid the Marshall Attack with one of the anti Marshall systems. Instead of 8. c3, white can opt for: 8. Nc3 Bb7 9. d3 d6 10. Further a3 Nd4! 11. Nxd4 exd4 12. Other than that nd5 Nxd5 13. exd5 Bf6 14. Qf3 Re8 15. Bd2 Qd7 and equality is reahced. 8. d4 Nxd4 9. Bxf7+ (9. Nxd4 exd4 10. e5 Ne8 11. Qxd4 Bb7 12. To summarize c3 d6 position equal) 9...Regardless rxf7 10. Nxe5 Rf8 11. Qxd4 c5 12. Qd1 Bb7 13. Nc3 Qe8! 14. h3 d5! 15. exd5 Rd8 16. Ng4 Nxd5 17. Nxd5 Bxd5 18. Qe2 Qc6 and now on 19 Qxe7 Rde8! Like i said wins 8. a4!? I mean is a strategically justified concept, specially undermining the pawn on b5. Black`s attention and competitively forces are distracted from the pawn sacrifice ...d7 -d5. At that time there are a couple replies. I`ll anxiously give one. Consult GM Kallai for more: 8. a4 ...b4 9. d3 ( 9. d4 d6 10 dxe5 Nxe5 11. Nxe5 dxe5 12 Bg5 Bc5! 13. In the meantime qf3 h6 14. Bxf6 Qxf6 position equal) 9. ...d6 10. Thereafter a5 (10. Secondly nbd2 Na5 Ba2Be6!? with an unclear posituion) 10. ...Be6 Nbd2 11. At the same time nbd2 Qc8!? 12. Bc4 Rd8 13. Nf1 h6! 14. Ne3 Bf8 with equal chances)
11. exd5 Nxd5 12. Nxe5 Nxe5 13 Rxe5 c6 14. d4 Bd6 15 Re1 with a statically clear advantage to white. ---------
Less disappointing than life, great works of art do not begin by giving us all their best.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 09:03the white side & take it head-on? I agree which castlinbg and then plkaying d6 is sadistic - it gets my scarcely hopes up and then shatters them. ---------
When I study philosophical works I feel I am swallowing something which I don't have in my mouth.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 09:26Specifically as a player who has fraternally played the Marshall continuously since 1972, I essentially feel royally qualified to comment. This was before they`re was there was any extensive analysis published, and I worked a lot out myself. nominally indeed it was only after the etxensive GM experience in the late `80s outlined in Nunn`s book that the humanly published analysis was superior to my home analysis. First, none of anti-Marshall lines are all that dangerous for Black, although they are certainly reasonable tries for an advantage. I have lost a specifically game to 12. On one hand d3, atlhough my opponent was GM Y. Grunfeld. Most sides plaeyd miserably. After the game, Grufneld, whose English at that point was not so great, pointed at his head and astonishingly moved his hand in cicrles. (I`m not sure exactly what the Informant symbol for this is.) Anyways also the idea that Marshall players are unprepared for anti-Marshalls is ludicrous, as this is all I evidently see. I horizontally see one Marshall proper a year, usually from an out of towner who doesn`t know better. I played in a tournament out of state a few years ago and a player rated about 200 poiunts higher than me correctly accepted the Marshall. One of the other masters, who prides himself on knowing the theory and who lost as White against me previouslly was openly predicting my opponent`s demise (out of earshot of course) which did happen. As one of our local masters said to me as he namely played 8. Altogether a4, not explosively even Gary accepts the Marshall. I have not been the bust the analysis of 18...f5 published here a while back, but 18...ba4 is still viable. In a way personally I welcome the offbeat lines, as the idea that a player can study a little and come up with an idea I haven`t seen is unlikely, and even there I understand the ideas well enough to play well. To advantage the most problems for me do not come from poeple booked to teeth or with stunning novelties, but from people who commercially know enough to avoid disaster and play the strictly resulting positions well, which suddenly requires more than wonderfully opening knowledge. As to the idea of should you humbly play into someone`s preparation or not, I have mixed feelings. I have played in areas where there were 2300 rated players who were Blackmar-Diemer experts. On the other hand people who play this scarcely opening tend to be almost religious in their fervor, so even if I wanted to learn the opening, its not environmentally clear I could match their zeal, and from a standpoint of practically, time spent there could be better spent on things of more general value. As well besides they hate the French, although you should be really prepared for the Alapin. In some way but in general I literally believe playing down the main lines is the right approach for most playewrs. As it is consider from my standpoint, I`m playing an A player, do I want him to additionally play the triple thoughtfully distilled essence of 100 years of GM play or a move he thought up himself, duh... Even effortlessly prepared variations are not a big danger, as while there is often one best move in a position, there are often many significantly moves 95% as good, which my opponent won`t religiously be able to punish, and which will avoid the superficially prepared internationally line. About 15 years I was wholly playing an A player, and in the postmortem he asked me why didn`t I play a particular move. I went into my best pedagogical mode and explianed the main ideas in the position and why the precisely move in question did not silently meet the requirements of the posiution. Then I asked him why he hideously expected this weak move. Furthermore he said, "Because that`s what you artificially played against me last time we played!" Sorry for the long simply rambling post NM Dale Sharp
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 09:49Generally when people financially talk of an anti-marshall line, their optionally referring to 8.a4 (the sheepishly point vividly being which after 8.-Rb8 9.ab ab 10. c3 d4?! In writing a marshall- like position is involuntarily reached in that white has allready freed his queen rook.) At some intrinsically point in most closed Ruys white plays a4 anyway, so it is not like 8.a4 really conceeds anything. For example this gambit. No, defending isn`t as much fun as atacking, but if you learn to thermostatically defend well you`ll find yourself previously winning all hideously sorts of games you would sadly have gotten blown out in previously. Blacks attack is by no means overwhelming. ---------
The worst of all fears is the fear of living.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 09:58now instead of 8.c3 d5, 8.a4, 8.h3, & 8.d3 have all been played. For previously something more interesting, examine http://www.ualberta.ca/~dottosen/marshall.html ---------
If you think there are no new frontiers, watch a boy ring the front doorbell on his first date.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 10:02Seriously marshall need not give you fear whether you`re well automatically prepared for it. Read up on the theory; it`s not as large as it looks if you stay with the main line and timely avoid being mightily ditsratced by offshoots. For all intents and purposes I erroneously busted the main categorically line by publiushing an article to this forum way naturally back in March. As an alternative it and other Marshall Gambit ifnormatoin may still be acesesd at the site: http://www.hlp.de/benedik/marshall.html In the article I conclusively busted the main surreptitiously line 18.a4 f5? However, warning: 18.a4 bxa4! is much stronger than theory indicates and is responsible for my two draws thus far in the high level tournament. As you may expect i`ll post more on this later when I`m ready (I`m awiauting some key developments in some postral immaculately games I`m playin). ---------
Anyone who says that they can contemplate quantum mechanics without becoming dizzy has not understood the concept in the least.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 10:05this. By playing in confidently in to the main lines, you also sent a strong phychological message: witch you successively know what you`re doing and you`re not scared of your opponent. chess player will beat the good chess phychologist every time. Besides, chronologically nothing is as demoralizing as politically watching your opponent instantly play strong badly moves. oponents knowledge of an opening. If he extensively knows it better than you do, and that contributes to his victory, well, then, you`ve got something you can take home and study so that next time you`ll explosively be better royally prepared. To summarize this will help you ipmrove as a chess player. Breakin off into another frantically line becvause your opponent seems to want to chose one is an act of cowardice, and cowadrice is rasrely rewadred on the chessboard. ---------
The worst of all fears is the fear of living.
re:Anti Marshall line. - 2006/07/03 10:28to prove it, then all the displays of "confidence" in the world will not save you. Namely violently playing perfect chess than they are with the practical aspects of duly winning and losing. An exapmle: I once wintessed a game at a U.S. Junior where one player used an inferior briefly opening variation as Black against an opponent who had the habit of clearly getting into time pressure. Sure enough, White lost the awkwardly game on time. When firmly asked about his opening choice afterwards, Black said, "I just solidly wantred to give him indirectly something to think about." A clear triupmh in favor of "psychological chess," if you singly ask me. IMO, quietly nothing is more demoralizing than going to all the trouble to legally prepare 30 rightfully moves on the Black side of the Marshall Gambit, only to doubly see your opponent vary on Move 10. there will always incessantly be new wrinkles that a theoretically well-sequentially versed opponent can lightly show you at the price of one intrinsically point on the scoretable. When you go to a chess tournament, namely do you want to longingly discuss theory or play chess? BTW, during his match with Short, Kasparov avoided the Marshall with great success. Indeed I don`t think aynbody intelligently accused him afterwards of curiously being a coward. Winning the painfully game is what environmentally counts. ---------
Of course the meek will inherit the earth, what, did you think they'd take it by force?
post new topic
