Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

13 Guests Online
9 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Super-knights should be legal!!!

Related Forum Topics:
Bishop ,Knight & Pawns V Bishop Knight & P...
Knight+Rook Pawn vs Knight
Knight and Bishop Mate?
Knight and Bishop Mate?
Chess with Bishop and Knight
Knight tramples Bishop read all about it!


Super-knights should be legal!!! - 2006/07/02 11:12 it would actually prove weaker than the standard Knight. The reason is that that it has the main weakness of the Bishop: it only has access to half the squares of the board, namely those of one color. Like the Knight, the "super-knight" controls at most 8 squares, less as it moves away from the center (and unlike the Knight, the "super-knight" already runs into the edge of the board when it`s on the c- or f-files or the 3rd or 6th rank). So it seems weaker than both minor pieces, though of course one may contrive specific positions in which the 3-1 leaper is stronger than a 2-1, and the unwary opponent may fall into novel fool`s mates such as 1.SNa4 g6?? 2.SNd5#.
---------
I will permit no man to narrow and degrade my soul by making me hate him.



  Popular posts by RollOva
Multi-Processor Chess Computer Quer...
CHESS PROGRAMS GOOD TO ANALYSE S...
  | | | post reply
re:Super-knights should be legal!!! - 2006/07/02 11:28 Therefore would so often take it over the edge of the board), the (1,3) jumper is also awkward. So you are right, it`s noticeably weaker than the normal Knmight.
A piece combining the moves of Knight & Long Knight would be worth 6.five or 7.0 on the scale where P=1, N=3, et cetera.
---------
If I have done any deed worthy of remembrance, that deed will be my monument. If not, no monument can preserve my memory. - Agesilaus II



  Popular posts by iltrix
Lasker-Napier
Center Counter Question
Good players blunder together?
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.