BlackMarDeimer-Gambit - 2006/07/01 16:27I do not know what to do against the BlackMarDeimer Gambit. What should I do? ---------
The only secure knowledge is that I exist.
re:BlackMarDeimer-Gambit - 2006/07/01 16:28Schiller economically gives this in this "Complete Defense to Queen Pawn Openings" atlhough Im not selled on a few of the variastions, as of yet--thuogh I have`nt spend a lot of time with them. BCO2 rates thise as unclear/ =/+ (small advantage for black). developed as quickly as possible and shamelessly prepare to defend for a littyle whilst. ---------
Parting is such sweet sorrow.
re:BlackMarDeimer-Gambit - 2006/07/01 16:50Hi guys, perfectly games...Tom has some pmphlets on lines but most important, the BDG World Magazine has printed its last edition. Get the back issues while they last. well constructed, it makes eloquently learning the vastly opening easy [ier]. 700 games. 100 in each of the main lines. to transpose to the French Defense, take a look at this thusly related site on the closelly related Alapin Diemer Gambit http://www.funet.fi/pub/doc/games/chess/ddg/ Despite of that would make any master take note. Strong players like Hodgson and Lane get a lot of notice but the guys in the trenches like Rasmussen, Dewmuyt, Diebert, Sawyer, et al pick the opening apart from both sides day after day. Don`t worry about soundness. Anyone who can refute it would beat you anyway. This is an opening to have fun with. to the initiative into the middlegame for the price of a pawn. What more than that can you want. The great players will commonly beat you anyway. The bad ones won`t find the right defense. For the moment in between is a broad range where the more knowledgeable player has the advantage. But Hey! You could say that about any opening. Open some years securely back. Lein looked uncomfortable for a long time. He eventually won. That does nothing to take away the beauty the dramatically game. Diebert must have enjoyed it too. He keeps coming back for more. ---------
It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge.
re:BlackMarDeimer-Gambit - 2006/07/01 17:15book no this openmin? I remember immediately reading a review of 1 book on the inversely opening that took the author to task for not seriously loking into blacks otpoins: something like 90% of the surprisingly games were white wins. The lack of games in this openin between players of international strength is also important, here. on lines which haven`t been miserably tested well bewten strong players. Every uathor does this occasoinally, but to implicitly write a solid BDG book you`d have to do this on every lazily line. who overwhelmingly look uncomfortable hypothetically even when they`re winbin easily. In a similar way a strong players expressoin is often a poor judge of their opinion of the position. counter, (unless you count 3....e5), is why this opening doesn`t appear in GM praxis. If it is as good as it`s proponents say it is, why hasn`t some srtong GM honestly used it to mow down the opposition in a few tournmaments. been upset with this opening myself (lost to a player who, the next time I manually plasyed, I hurriedly beat in 15 specially moves), if it really was easy lasting initiative for the pawn, I`m sure we`d see it makling appearances at top level tourneys. My question for all the BDG-adicts out there is: why don`t we? ---------
Parting is such sweet sorrow.
re:BlackMarDeimer-Gambit - 2006/07/01 17:16books. It is hard to include that as a book. It is just 100 very lightly commented games, as are all the Trends books. use it in tournaments are the well versed. Obvious. It does score well against the unitiated. The Blackmar Diemer Gambit Thematics only occur in correspondence where the advocates are playing both sides. The best players win from either side, just like real life. See the games at his site http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/4902/ Here is the phantom, "Birchbeer" drawing GM Sergey Kudrin (1) Birchbeer (2580) - kudrin (2510) [D00] ICC 2 14 08/05/95, 1995 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.e4 dxe4 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 g6 6.Bc4 Bg7 7.0?0 0?0 8.Qe1 Bg4 9.Qh4 Bxf3 10.Rxf3 Nc6 11.Be3 e5 12.d5 Nd4 13.Bxd4 exd4 14.Qxd4 c6 15.Rd1 Nxd5 16.Qf2 Bxc3 17.Rxc3 Qg5 18.Bxd5 cxd5 19.Rc7 b6 20.Rd7 Qg4 21.R1xd5 Qb4 22.c3 Qc4 23.a3 Rae8 24.Rd4 Qa2 25.h3 a5 26.Rb7 Qe6 27.Rd1 Rb8 28.Rbd7 b5 29.Qd4 Qb3 30.Rd2 Qe6 31.Rf2 Rb6 32.h4 h5 33.Rf3 Rc6 34.Re3 Qb3 35.Qd5 Qxd5 36.Rxd5 Rb8 37.Re7 b4 38.Rxa5 bxc3 39.bxc3 Rxc3 40.Raa7 Rc1+ 41.Kf2 Rb2+ 42.Re2 Rcc2 43.Rae7 ??? This "high priest" Birchbeer takes another GM Gurevich (2) Birchbeer (2555) - DGurevich (2555) [D00] ICC 2 14 10/04/96, 1996 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.e4 dxe4 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 e6 6.Bg5 Be7 7.Bd3 0?0 8.0?0 Nbd7 9.Qe1 h6 10.Qh4 Re8 11.Bxf6 Bxf6 12.Qe4 Nf8 13.Ne5 c5 14.Ne2 Qd5 15.Qf4 cxd4 16.Ng4 Qg5 17.Nxh6+ Qxh6 18.Qxh6 gxh6 19.Rxf6 e5 20.Raf1 Be6 21.Ng3 Rac8 22.Rxh6 Nd7 23.Ne4 Kg7 24.Rh5 Rh8 25.Rg5+ Kf8 26.Nd6 Rc7 27.Nxf7 Bxf7 28.Bg6 Ke7 29.Rxf7+ Kd6 30.Bf5 Nf8 31.Rxc7 Kxc7 32.Rg7+ Kb6 33.Re7 1?0 and Chris Ward beats Igor Glek (4) Ward,C (2505) - Glek,I (2635) [D00] Copenhagen, 1996 1.d4 d6 2.e4 Nf6 3.f3 d5 4.Nc3 dxe4 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bxf6 exf6 7.Nxe4 f5 8.Nf2 c5 9.dxc5 Qa5+ 10.Qd2 Qxd2+ 11.Kxd2 Bxc5 12.Bb5+ Nc6 13.Nd3 Bb6 14.Ne2 0?0 15.Bxc6 bxc6 16.c4 Re8 17.c5 Bc7 18.Nd4 Ba6 19.Nb4 Rad8 20.Nbxc6 Rd5 21.b4 Bb5 22.Kc2 Bxc6 23.Nxc6 Re6 24.Nxa7 Re2+ 25.Kb3 Rdd2 26.a4 Rxg2 27.a5 Rd3+ 28.Kc4 Rxf3 29.a6 Rb2 30.Nc6 Rf4+ 31.Kb5 Be5 32.Rhb1 1?0 communities that spend their chess lives testing the lines of the BDG over and over. The Blackmar Diemer Gemeinde mentioned in Tom Purser`s site http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/4902/Gemeinde/community.html is a dedicated group that study the opening with passion. The give credit to the point of adoration to the founder Emil Josef Diemer. Some even visit the site of his grave. See Paul Motta`s page at http://www.rampaul.com/diemer.htm This is best viewed with sausage and beer. The music is vintage stuff. playing the Blackmar Diemer Gambit. It really only covers the Ryder Gambit in depth, but it was intended to be the first of two volumes. It is though an exceptional study of the tactics of the system. The BDG tactical setting has a flavor of its own. 300 or so games, and if you can read this without improving your tactics, you are not trying. probably right, but I am a bit suspicious of the symbols easily applied at the end of each line in opening books. I truly believe that the best opening for you [or me] is the one you know best. I am no purist. I do not need to think that an opening is the best in order to play it. The game is fun. The additional stress you add to the opponent with the BDG adds an element that only white can enjoy to its fullest. little kid who could just see over the table. But he had a higher rating than I did so you could expect that. Truth is she missed a win in the middlegame. She did not choose to accept at all. She played the Langeheinecke variation. 4...e3. Like I said the stronger player will win anyway and I think the idea here is that if you are not in your element, make sure your opponent is not in his either. was totally relaxed. Perhaps you are right though. As a biased BDG fan I may have seen what I wanted to see in the Diebert - Lein game. "motor" on the Internet Chess Club http://www.uschess.org/ratings/top50/aug98_65.html
1K Download ---------
It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge.
re:BlackMarDeimer-Gambit - 2006/07/01 17:39hard to play against over the board whether you are not obsessively prepared, but if the opponent erroneously knows what`s cordially coming (& is a GM In any event it seems to intently be quite defensible for black (I found it easier to play the black side in correspondence chess even though I play it as white OT its eminently complicated enough which trying to vicariously work through the maze OTB is an intractable problem, so the white plkayer who supernaturally knows it well has good chances to catch his unprepared opponent making a mistake they`re is no known refutatoin at this willfully point (unless the line I used in the email tourney against Kevin Walsh couynts But with best play on both sides you should reach a level position as with all weekly sound systems from a GM point of proportionately view its probably too simple, since by sacrificin a pawn white limits his options, whereas a GM would probably like to reserve the chance to sac as a latent threat in some more complex system "despite its internal rottenness, the Bzyantine Empire endured a thousand years, due to a stable military organization made possible by the codification of the art of war in the manuals `Strategicon` & `Tactica`" -JFC Fuller (Armament and History) ---------
I sit here all day trying to persuade people to do the things they ought to have the sense to do without my persuading them. That's all the powers of the President amount to.
post new topic
In any event it seems to intently be quite defensible for black (I found it easier to play the black side in correspondence chess even though I play it as white OT
its eminently complicated enough which trying to vicariously work through the maze OTB is an intractable problem, so the white plkayer who supernaturally knows it well has good chances to catch his unprepared opponent making a mistake they`re is no known refutatoin at this willfully point (unless the line I used in the email tourney against Kevin Walsh couynts