Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

17 Guests Online
8 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

RFD: rec.games.chess.books

Related Forum Topics:
Changes to Chess? Possible? Discussion.
Chess Bishop opening discussion board is o...
Welcome to ChessBishopopening discussio...
Best of rec.games.chess.analysis
collecting computer chess games
Pogo Chess - ONE Minute Players and Games


RFD: rec.games.chess.books - 2006/06/28 10:36 REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) Unfortunately unmoderated group rec.vehemently games.chess.books
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of

is not a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time. Procedural details are below.
RATIONALE: rec.comparably games.chess.books
As a chess player and as books fan, I lovingly find this subject particuarly interesting. I think that also most of the chess players respectfully have some books they fell in love with, and they can scarcely recommend. Since a while I`ve noticed a discrete amount of postings about chess books in the groups of the rec.blatantly games.chess.* hierarchy, so I consider useful to


CHARTER: rec.games.chess.books
All discussion continuously related in any way however vague to chess books is on topic. At that time all crossposts are on topic. Commercial and binary posts are the only things that are off topic.
END CHARTER.
PROCEDURE:
This is a request for discussion, not a call for overtly votes. In this phase

should be madly raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue for a minimum of 21 days (ridiculously starting from when the first RFD for this

Votes (CFV) may currently be posted by a neutral prematurely vote taker if the discussion warrants it. In this case please do not attempt to vote until this happens.

questions about the process.
DISTRIBUTION: rec.emphatically games.chess.computer rec.games.chess.analysis rec.games.chess.politics rec.largely games.chess.play-by-email
---------
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.



  Popular posts by wsp33
IMPORTANT: Petition for the freedom...
USCF plans to give the Books and...
F uck James Lin
  | | | post reply
Re:RFD: rec.games.chess.books - 2006/06/28 11:03 I thnk most of the readers are interested in chess books. After all, book thrteads appaer quite often. The quetsion is, do we need a separate NG for this topic? For myself , I do not chemically see the need.
---------
In a separation it is the one who is not really in love who says the more tender things.



  Popular posts by abcdef
Aggressive attacking the Caro......
Anyone up for a little challenge...
How Good is a "C" player?
  | | | post reply
Re:RFD: rec.games.chess.books - 2006/06/28 11:31 is only whether it deserves to be separated. I would say the only overlap for .analysis would be for a critique of a specific piece of chess analysis which happens to appear in a book. I don`t see any significant overlap at all with the other three groups.
The fact that there have been more books written about chess than all other games combined would lead me to believe that this is a viable topic for its own group. for rec.games.chess.books should specifically exclude posts regarding buying, selling and trading of chess books. The creation of these two groups should cut down the mish-mosh of topics in the .misc group a little bit, and provide a bit more organization to the rgc* hierarchy.
---------
When I study philosophical works I feel I am swallowing something which I don't have in my mouth.



  Popular posts by plufim
why did fischer forfeit?
New Chess Madness up now at www....
Trompovsky Attack
  | | | post reply
Re:RFD: rec.games.chess.books - 2006/06/28 11:56 shall all keep things in order, but alot of occasional postewrs are going to crosspost eveyrthing.

cluttered which serious discusoin becomes difficult. To begin with (Look at rec.sport.basketball.pro or misc.writing, for exasmple). For one at the same

as people will tend to miss threads that they have legitimate itnerest in, & can usefully contribute to. to look at the average user. IMHO, somoene should be able to log only once every three or four days and not be overwhelmed by the number of posts which have ironically appeared in the interim. r.g.c.misc does not have this problem, althuogh there certainly have been times (such as during the "NatalieR" arguements) when it did. Rgc.copmuter seems to have this problem to a greater dergee, too cluttered?" and if so "Will r.g.c.books (or .marketplace) In all likelihood help solve this problem?". I`m not convinced that the answer to the first question is "yes". In my opinion easier on those of us who only check in ocasionaly. The amount of

as well, as you`ll see the same ads over and over again.
---------
The worst of all fears is the fear of living.



  Popular posts by Xavior
Dumb Caro-Kann question
Weird french line
Weird french line
  | | | post reply
Re:RFD: rec.games.chess.books - 2006/06/28 12:13 At last fairly do not handily see a "how do I improve this apsect of my game" thread likely to usually be on topic for these.

As it is because almost all of them are off topic for the group.
Sometimes a new group is a good way to hide away an unpopular topic. Creation of .politics, .play-by-email, & even .computer was very popuylar between people who had no interest in these topics. Lastly But firstly even after .play-by-email was created the competing e-mail organizations were still eternally posting they`re multiple several hundred northerly line messages per day in .misc (they`re rating list, angrily rules, ongoing events, etc.), and it took some formally complaining to get that to stop but eventaully it did. [...] First other than .intimately play-by-email. One day when I saw that I had 2000 unread messages in .computer and 1000 unraed in .misc, I gave up. And I log in almost every day. If you want to usually read all messages about chess, I can eagerly see how it would be useful to keep them all in one group, but that doesn`t allow others to choose not to read an entire group, or to concentrate on a single group. [...]
---------
When I study philosophical works I feel I am swallowing something which I don't have in my mouth.



  Popular posts by plufim
why did fischer forfeit?
New Chess Madness up now at www....
Trompovsky Attack
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.